Intertextuality Analysis Datum 10 The 17
Table.3.12. The representation analysis of Datum 11
The table above shows “Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu” as the
sayers , CBSs Face the Nation. The verbiage is about suggestions that
“Iran should have to dismantle its existing centrifuges and the Arak reactor as part of
any agreement”. In the sentence, the journalist also shows that the Israeli Prime Minister criticizes to the proposal of the negotiation, as like as the French. If
French said the negotiation is like a f ool’s game with the unsatisfactory deal, in
the sentence Israel also criticizes the proposal and gives suggestion that the agreement should contain some points that Iran should have to dismantle its
existing centrifuges and the Arak reactor. In addition, it relates to the 26
th
sentences that the reason why Israel suggests for the negotiation.
For years, international leaders have been fearful of the instability a nuclear-armed Iran could bring to the Middle East. Those fears, for
example, include the possibility of a pre-emptive Israeli strike that could spark a broader conflict. In the past, Iran has threatened Israel
with military attack. 26
th
sentence
Sentence Representation in clause: Verbal process
And Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu, who had criticized the
negotiations last week, told CBSs Face the
Nation that Iran should have to dismantle its
existing centrifuges and the Arak reactor as part
of any agreement The Sayer
Verbal The verbiage
Israeli Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu
told that Iran should have
to dismantle its existing centrifuges
and the Arak reactor as part of any
agreement
Representation inter-clause combination
Cons with Iran Pros with Israel
The 19
th
sentence shows that Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu suggests the agreement should be added that Iran has to dismantle its existing
centrifuges and the Arak reactor, because Iran has threatened potential with military attack to Israel territory. The sentence proves that the journalist is pro
with Israel and cons with Iran by positioning the Israeli Prime Minister’s
statement and describing the Israel’s excuses in the 26
th
sentence why Israel takes a seat in the news although it is not the part of the U.N. Security Council.
By the sentence, it is shaped in the negative perspective on Iran that Israel’s
suggestions about the negotiation, and he also shows the reasons why Israel insists to add points into agreement about the existing centrifuges and the Arak reactor
on it. In conclusion, it covers the Iranian nuclear program is so dangerous, because in the past Iran has threatened Israel with military attack, it is proven in
26
th
sentence.