7. Grouping the results of each indicator, such as the result of analysis.
8. After grouping the results, the perspective news in CNN will also be
found. 4.
The Instrument of the Research
The instrument of the research is the researcher herself. She reads, identifies, underlines, italics, classifies, analyzes, and compares the data of the
article in CNN Kerry: U.S. isn‟t „blind‟ or „stupid‟ on Iran 10 November 2013
edition between the internal text and the external text from the other media before drawing the conclusion. In addition, books, journal, and other related sources
linguistics, language and power, mass media, critical discourse analysis also play the role as the instrument to strengthen data and the reseacher
’s opinion as the researcher.
CHAPTER II THEORETICAL DESCIRPTION
A. Previous Research
The analysis is not the first time. First of all, there are researches on Critical Discourse Analysis which focus on discourse in mass media.
Alfi Syahriyani in 2011, uses Teun Van Dijk theory of her analysis on Indonesian national media online, KOMPAS, with title,
“Rhetoric of the Relationship between United States and Indonesia in Obamas Speech at UI: A
Critical Discourse Analysis Approach”. Kompas.com on 11 September 2010 noted the Obamas speech at UI is a great one, whose influence is equivalent to his
speech delivered in Cairo, Egypt. This study analyzes the rhetorical strategy of Obamas speech transcription released by the White House, using Critical
Discourse Analysis CDA as the main theory, and Gramscis hegemony as the supporting theory.
Another research with using mass media in Indonesia is Mohammad Rinaldi in 2011 with title,
“The US Liberal-Democracy Ideology Hegemony And The Global War On Terror Discourse In Mass Media A Critical Discourse Analysis
On The Killing Of Usamah Bin Ladin By US Troops Coverage in Kompas Daily”. This research observed mass media as a contested terrain. In such
context, the discourse represented through news in mass media which is perceived
