The sentence which is shaped with contra side on Iran and U.S., has been proven by The Guardian app
58
too, which is quoted by French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius and given a clearer explanation.
The French complained that the text, which they said was mostly drafted by Iran and the US, had been presented as a fait accompli and
they did not want to be stampeded into agreement. Fabius told France Inter radio yesterday morning that Paris would not accept a “fool’s
game”. “As I speak to you, I cannot say there is any certainty that we can conclude,” he said. The Guardian app
By the article above, the journalist shows that French is the one of P5+1 country who complains about the agreement because the negotiation is mostly
drafted by Iran and US. Consequently, Paris would not accept that kind of game. The sentence shows that the journalist offers the French side who disagree with
the proposal, and presents U.S. and Iran in negative perspective that is shaped by the journalist.
9. Datum 9 The 16
th
sentence
a. Representation Analysis
The critics from the French side relates to the 16
th
sentence. The sentence contains about the prizes for Iran from the P5+1 country which is French inside,
the journalist tells the prizes for Iran in the negotiation. The sentence which is also
58
http:www.theguardian.comworld2013nov10iran-nuclear-deal-stalls-reactor- plutonium-france
, Op Cit.
appears the negative perspective on Iran, is quoted by the U.S. administration officials’ statement.
The officials said that in return, the P5+1 powers of the United States, Britain, France, Russia, China and Germany would unfreeze some
Iranian assets held in banks overseas and consider easing sanctions banning trade in gold, precious metals and petrochemicals. Other
sweeteners were also under consideration, they said. The 16
th
sentence Table.3.10. The representation analysis of Datum 9
Sentence Representation in clause: 1. Verbal process
The officials said that in return, the P5+1
powers of the United States, Britain, France,
Russia, China and Germany would
unfreeze some Iranian assets held in banks
overseas and consider easing sanctions
banning trade in gold, precious metals and
petrochemicals. Other sweeteners were also
under consideration, they said.
The Sayer Verbal
The verbiage
The officials
said that in return, the P5+1
powers of the United States, Britain, France, Russia,
China and Germany would unfreeze some Iranian
assets held in banks overseas and consider
easing sanctions banning trade in gold, precious
metals and petrochemicals They
said Other sweeteners were also
under consideration
Representation in clause combination 1.
Determiner
“The officials”
2. Lexical cohesion: hyponymy
“the P5+1 powers of the United States, Britain, France, Russia, China and Germany”
Representation inter-clause combination
Pros with U.S. Cons with Iran
Based on the table above, the journalist shows the officials as the Sayers who give statement that the P5+1 power would unfreeze some Iranian assets, if
Iran accepted the proposal in the negotiation that it has to stop its program of enriching uranium. The journalist also adds the other profit for Iran which is
