who is the one of the P5+1 power. Fabius as the Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Development in France, criticizes the agreement is like a fools
game because it is unsatisfactory deal. The clause is showed by the journalist
French that one of P5+1 country protests with the negotiation. By positioning the U.S. officials and French’s argumentation, the journalist
shows the contradiction between the U.S. administration officials which support the negotiation and the French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius. The sentence
presents that the one of official of the U.S. administration says the deal is designed to delay the point at which Iran could develop a nuclear weapon while
providing temporary, reversible sanctions relief, but for France the deal is not a convenient one, Paris would refuse the deal because there is any certainty that
French can conclude of it. However, both of the U.S. officials and French’s
statement are in contra with Iran which refuses the deal although the proposal is mostly drafted by U.S. and Iran. It proves that the journalist presents the negative
perspective on Iran both of the U.S. officials and French’s arguments.
b. Intertextuality Analysis
The French statement is strengthened by The Guardian app
60
that already has been analyzed in the 15
th
sentence.
The French complained that the text, which they said was mostly drafted by Iran and the US, had been presented as a fait accompli and
they did not want to be stampeded into agreement. Fabius told France Inter radio yesterday morning that Paris would not ac
cept a “fool’s
60
http:www.theguardian.comworld2013nov10iran-nuclear-deal-stalls-reactor- plutonium-france
, Op Cit.
game”. “As I speak to you, I cannot say there is any certainty that we can conclude,” he said. The Guardian app
It proves that the journalist shows the French is unsatisfied by the negotiation which is almost drafted by Iran and the U.S. In the case, the sentence
is presented the contradiction in the negotiation, but the journalist still showing the negative perspective on Iran. It is proven if we compared with the analysis on
the sentences before, the journalist shows that Iran would get the points which soften Iranian sanctions, and Iran is drafted the outline of the negotiation, but Iran
refuses the deal, that is the point why Laurent Fabius says the deal is like fool’s game. The analysis also is strengthened by the article above that the journalist
presents Iran in the negative perspective from the U.S. officials and French’s statement in the sentence.
11. Datum 11 The 19
th
sentence a.
Representation Analysis
And Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who had criticized the negotiations last week, told CBSs Face the Nation that Iran
should have to dismantle its existing centrifuges and the Arak reactor as part of any agreement. The 19
th
sentence Not only French which against the proposal on the table, but also, Israeli
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu who criticizes the proposal. It is quoted in CBSs Face the Nation, by the journalist with indirect speech. It also shows that
the journalist shows the negative perspective on Iran in the negotiation.
Table.3.12. The representation analysis of Datum 11
The table above shows “Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu” as the
sayers , CBSs Face the Nation. The verbiage is about suggestions that
“Iran should have to dismantle its existing centrifuges and the Arak reactor as part of
any agreement”. In the sentence, the journalist also shows that the Israeli Prime Minister criticizes to the proposal of the negotiation, as like as the French. If
French said the negotiation is like a f ool’s game with the unsatisfactory deal, in
the sentence Israel also criticizes the proposal and gives suggestion that the agreement should contain some points that Iran should have to dismantle its
existing centrifuges and the Arak reactor. In addition, it relates to the 26
th
sentences that the reason why Israel suggests for the negotiation.
For years, international leaders have been fearful of the instability a nuclear-armed Iran could bring to the Middle East. Those fears, for
example, include the possibility of a pre-emptive Israeli strike that could spark a broader conflict. In the past, Iran has threatened Israel
with military attack. 26
th
sentence
Sentence Representation in clause: Verbal process
And Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu, who had criticized the
negotiations last week, told CBSs Face the
Nation that Iran should have to dismantle its
existing centrifuges and the Arak reactor as part
of any agreement The Sayer
Verbal The verbiage
Israeli Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu
told that Iran should have
to dismantle its existing centrifuges
and the Arak reactor as part of any
agreement
Representation inter-clause combination
Cons with Iran Pros with Israel
