Researcher C: Collaborator Interview 5, Appendix E

Yes, there was interesting. If they were noisy, they were asked to do like this rolling her hand R : Oh yang rolling-rolling up itu ya?routines and patterns berarti cukup efektif ya bu? You mean rolling-rolling movement, right? Were the routines and patterns effective? T : Anak-anak suka belum pernah saya gituin, itu inovasi baru. The children liked that, they had not got before, this was new innovation. …………………………… R : Berarti itu dipertahankan yang itu ya bu routtine pattern. In other words, this will be maintained, right? T : Iya, yang English yes I can biar gak bosen, soalnya kalo sama saya rame banget. Yes, this one, ‘English yes I can’ will be maintained, so they were not bored, because they were so noisy with me.

R: Research T: Teacher Interview 12, Appendix E

While she told the students to work in pairs, some students moved to other chair. It made the class a little bit noisy. The researcher made them to be quiet by leading a jargon. But, a boy moved again and disrupted other friends. She made him to back to his chair, “good boy, sit down here, please” then she continued to explain about the rule of a game called a card game. Field notes 2, appendix D Generally the action research plans implemented in the Cycle 1 ran well. The core of the action research in which to implement Fun learning activities to improve English teaching and learning process was proven by the raise of participation students in every activities. The raise of motivation contributed a lot to their activeness in learning process. The actions did this creating fun atmosphere in the classroom. The fun learning activities were interesting for the students. They were excited to do the activities. However, there was weakness in the application. The activities were ineffective at the first meeting. The fact was because of the bad time management. The time was not enough to conduct the fun learning namely Things in the Middle game. Consequently, one of fun learning was conducted in