Segment Information Financial Report | Smartfren

PT SMARTFREN TELECOM Tbk DAN ENTITAS ANAK Catatan atas Laporan Keuangan Konsolidasian Untuk Tahun-tahun yang Berakhir 31 Desember 2013 dan 2012 Angka-angka Disajikan dalam Rupiah, kecuali Dinyatakan Lain PT SMARTFREN TELECOM Tbk AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements For the Years Ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 Figures are Presented in Rupiah, unless Otherwise Stated - 116 - Berdasarkan Peraturan Menteri Komunikasi dan Informatika No. 8PerM.KOMINFO02 2006 tanggal 8 Februari 2006, tarif interkoneksi ditetapkan berdasarkan biaya yang harus dicantumkan dalam Dokumen Penawaran Interkoneksi dari masing- masing operator. Peraturan tersebut diterapkan oleh seluruh operator terhitung sejak 1 Januari 2007. Based on the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Regulation No. 8PerM.KOMINFO022006 dated February 8, 2006, the interconnection tariff is determined using the cost based interconnection tariff which should be included in the Interconnection Offering Document of each operator. The regulation is implemented by all operators effective on January 1, 2007. 46. Litigasi Kontinjensi 46. Legal Matters and Contingencies a. Berdasarkan Keputusan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha KPPU perkara No. 26KPPU-L2007 sehubungan dengan adanya dugaan pelanggaran Pasal 5 Undang-undang No. 5 tahun 1999 UU No. 51999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat mengenai penetapan tarif pesan singkat SMS, yaitu sebagai berikut: a. The Commission for the Supervision of Business Competition KPPU had issued decision No. 26KPPU-L2007 in relation to the alleged violations of the Law No. 5 year 1999 act. 5 concerning Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business in determination of the short message service SMS tariff, for the following: - Bahwa KPPU telah memberikan laporan Pemeriksaan Perkara No. 26KPPU-L2007, yang menyimpulkan PT Mobile-8 Telecom Tbk terbukti melanggar pasal 5 UU No. 51999. - KPPU had given the investigation report case No. 26KPPU-L2007, which concluded that PT Mobile-8 Telecom Tbk has proven to violate the Law No. 5 year 1999 act 5. - Bahwa selanjutnya, pada tanggal 18 Juni 2008, perkara aquo telah diputus oleh KPPU, dengan putusan yaitu: - PT Mobile-8 Telecom Tbk terbukti melanggar pasal 5 Undang-undang No 5 tahun 1999. - PT Mobile-8 Telecom Tbk dikenakan denda sebesar Rp 5.000.000.000 dan dituduh mengakibatkan kerugian konsumen periode tahun 2004 sampai dengan 2007 sebesar Rp 52.300.000.000. - Furthermore, on June 18, 2008, the aquo case has been decided by KPPU, with decision: - PT Mobile-8 Telecom Tbk proved violating the Law No. 5 year 1999 act 5. - PT Mobile-8 Telecom Tbk was fined to pay Rp 5,000,000,000 and being suspected of creating customers loss for the years 2004 to 2007 amounting to Rp 52,300,000,000. Perusahaan telah mengajukan keberatan terhadap putusan KPPU tersebut yang terdaftar dalam register perkara No. 03KPPU2008PN.JKT.PST dan sampai dengan tanggal penyelesaian laporan keuangan ini, Perusahaan masih menunggu proses persidangan lebih lanjut. The Company filed an objection on such decision with case registration No. 03KPPU2008PN.JKT.PST and as of the date of completion of the consolidated financial statements, the Company is still waiting for further court process. PT SMARTFREN TELECOM Tbk DAN ENTITAS ANAK Catatan atas Laporan Keuangan Konsolidasian Untuk Tahun-tahun yang Berakhir 31 Desember 2013 dan 2012 Angka-angka Disajikan dalam Rupiah, kecuali Dinyatakan Lain PT SMARTFREN TELECOM Tbk AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements For the Years Ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 Figures are Presented in Rupiah, unless Otherwise Stated - 117 - b. Pada tanggal 14 Juni 2011, Perusahaan telah memenangkan gugatan di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara terhadap tagihan kekurangan pembayaran BHP ISR dan BHP pita frekuensi tahun pertama dari Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika Kemenkominfo. b. On June 14, 2011, the Company has won the lawsuits at Administrative Court against under payment of BHP ISR and BHP frequency band for the first year filed by Minister of Communication and Information Technology Kemenkominfo. Kemenkominfo telah melakukan upaya banding terhadap keputusan PTUN tersebut. Pengadilan Tinggi TUN, melalui Putusan tertanggal 5 Desember 2011, menguatkan putusan PTUN. Pada tanggal 20 Januari 2012, Kemenkominfo mengajukan permohonan kasasi ke Mahkamah Agung. The Minister of Communication and Information Technology submitted an appeal on the Administrative court decision. The High Court of Justice, through a verdict dated December 5, 2011, uphold the Administrative court decision. On January 20, 2012, Minister of Communication and Information Technology filed a cassation to the Supreme Court. Mahkamah Agung telah menolak permohonan kasasi dari Kemenkominfo. Salinan Keputusan Kasasi di MA telah dikirimkan oleh PTUN pada tanggal 6 September 2013. The Supreme Court has rejected the cassation filed by Minister of Communication and Information Technology. Copy of the Supreme Court decision has been delivered by Administrative Court on September 6, 2013. Pada tanggal 4 Nopember 2011, Perusahaan mengajukan gugatan baru terhadap keputusan Kemenkominfo tentang penetapan besaran dan waktu pembayaran BHP pita frekuensi tahun kedua. Pada tanggal 22 Pebruari 2012, PTUN telah mengeluarkan salinan putusan yang mengabulkan seluruh gugatan, menunda pelaksanaan keputusan kemenkominfo sampai ada putusan berkekuatan hukum tetap, membatalkan objek gugatan dan memerintahkan Kemenkominfo mencabut objek gugatan dan menerbitkan kepmen baru. On November 4, 2011, the Company filed a new lawsuit against the decision from Minister of Communication and Information Technology on determination of the amount and timing of BHP frequency band payment for the second year. On 22 February 2012, the Administration court issued a copy of a verdict in which granting all the lawsuits, delaying the execution of the decision from Minister of Communication and Information Technology until there is an incracht verdict, aborting the object of the lawsuits and ordering Minister of Communication and Information Technology to repeal the object of the lawsuits and issue the new ministerial decree. Pada tanggal 25 April 2012, Kemenkominfo mengajukan keberatan dengan mengajukan banding kepada Pengadilan Tinggi Tata Usaha Negara. On April 25, 2012, The Minister of Communication and Information Technology submitted an appeal to the State Administrative High Court. Pada tanggal 10 Juli 2012, Pengadilan Tinggi Tata Usaha Negara mengeluarkan keputusan yang menguatkan keputusan PTUN. Atas putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Tata Usaha Negara ini Kemenkominfo tidak mengajukan Kasasi ke Mahkamah Agung, sehingga Putusan ini telah menjadi keputusan yang berkekuatan hukum tetap. On July 10, 2012, the State Administrative High Court issue a decision in which strengthening the Administrative Court decision. Upon this State Administrative High Court’s decision, Minister of Communication and Information Technology did not submit the cassation to the Supreme Court which made this decision became an incracht verdict.