Segment Information Financial Report | Smartfren
PT SMARTFREN TELECOM Tbk DAN ENTITAS ANAK
Catatan atas Laporan Keuangan Konsolidasian Untuk Tahun-tahun yang Berakhir
31 Desember 2013 dan 2012 Angka-angka Disajikan dalam Rupiah,
kecuali Dinyatakan Lain PT SMARTFREN TELECOM Tbk
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Years Ended December 31, 2013 and 2012
Figures are Presented in Rupiah, unless Otherwise Stated
- 116 - Berdasarkan Peraturan Menteri Komunikasi
dan Informatika No. 8PerM.KOMINFO02 2006 tanggal 8 Februari 2006, tarif
interkoneksi ditetapkan berdasarkan biaya yang harus dicantumkan dalam Dokumen
Penawaran Interkoneksi dari masing- masing operator. Peraturan tersebut
diterapkan oleh seluruh operator terhitung sejak 1 Januari 2007.
Based on the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Regulation
No. 8PerM.KOMINFO022006 dated
February 8, 2006, the interconnection tariff is determined using the cost based
interconnection tariff which should be included in the Interconnection Offering
Document of each operator. The regulation is implemented by all operators effective on
January 1, 2007.
46. Litigasi Kontinjensi 46. Legal Matters and Contingencies
a. Berdasarkan Keputusan Komisi Pengawas
Persaingan Usaha KPPU perkara No. 26KPPU-L2007 sehubungan dengan
adanya dugaan pelanggaran Pasal 5 Undang-undang No. 5 tahun 1999
UU No. 51999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak
Sehat mengenai penetapan tarif pesan singkat SMS, yaitu sebagai berikut:
a. The Commission for the Supervision of Business Competition KPPU had issued
decision No. 26KPPU-L2007 in relation to the alleged violations of the Law No. 5 year
1999 act. 5 concerning Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business
in determination of the short message service SMS tariff, for the following:
- Bahwa KPPU telah memberikan laporan Pemeriksaan Perkara
No. 26KPPU-L2007, yang menyimpulkan PT Mobile-8 Telecom
Tbk terbukti melanggar pasal 5 UU No. 51999.
- KPPU had given the investigation
report case No. 26KPPU-L2007, which concluded that PT Mobile-8
Telecom Tbk has proven to violate the Law No. 5 year 1999 act 5.
- Bahwa selanjutnya, pada tanggal
18 Juni 2008, perkara aquo telah diputus oleh KPPU, dengan putusan
yaitu: - PT Mobile-8 Telecom Tbk
terbukti melanggar pasal 5 Undang-undang No 5 tahun
1999. - PT Mobile-8 Telecom Tbk
dikenakan denda sebesar Rp 5.000.000.000 dan dituduh
mengakibatkan kerugian konsumen periode tahun 2004
sampai dengan 2007 sebesar Rp 52.300.000.000.
- Furthermore, on June 18, 2008, the
aquo case has been decided by KPPU, with decision:
- PT Mobile-8 Telecom Tbk proved violating the Law No. 5
year 1999 act 5. -
PT Mobile-8 Telecom Tbk was fined to pay Rp 5,000,000,000
and being suspected of creating customers loss for the years
2004 to 2007 amounting to Rp 52,300,000,000.
Perusahaan telah mengajukan keberatan terhadap putusan KPPU tersebut yang
terdaftar dalam register perkara No. 03KPPU2008PN.JKT.PST dan
sampai dengan tanggal penyelesaian laporan keuangan ini, Perusahaan masih
menunggu proses persidangan lebih lanjut. The Company filed an objection on such
decision with case registration No. 03KPPU2008PN.JKT.PST and as of
the date of completion of the consolidated financial statements, the Company is still
waiting for further court process.
PT SMARTFREN TELECOM Tbk DAN ENTITAS ANAK
Catatan atas Laporan Keuangan Konsolidasian Untuk Tahun-tahun yang Berakhir
31 Desember 2013 dan 2012 Angka-angka Disajikan dalam Rupiah,
kecuali Dinyatakan Lain PT SMARTFREN TELECOM Tbk
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Years Ended December 31, 2013 and 2012
Figures are Presented in Rupiah, unless Otherwise Stated
- 117 - b. Pada tanggal 14 Juni 2011, Perusahaan
telah memenangkan gugatan di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara terhadap tagihan
kekurangan pembayaran BHP ISR dan BHP pita frekuensi tahun pertama dari
Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika Kemenkominfo.
b. On June 14, 2011, the Company has won
the lawsuits at Administrative Court against under payment of BHP ISR and BHP
frequency band for the first year filed by Minister of Communication and Information
Technology Kemenkominfo.
Kemenkominfo telah melakukan upaya banding terhadap keputusan PTUN
tersebut. Pengadilan Tinggi TUN, melalui Putusan tertanggal 5 Desember 2011,
menguatkan putusan PTUN. Pada tanggal 20 Januari 2012, Kemenkominfo
mengajukan permohonan kasasi ke Mahkamah Agung.
The Minister of Communication and Information Technology submitted an
appeal on the Administrative court decision. The High Court of Justice, through a verdict
dated December 5, 2011, uphold the Administrative court decision. On January
20, 2012, Minister of Communication and Information Technology filed a cassation to
the Supreme Court.
Mahkamah Agung telah menolak permohonan kasasi dari Kemenkominfo.
Salinan Keputusan Kasasi di MA telah dikirimkan oleh PTUN pada tanggal
6 September 2013. The Supreme Court has rejected the
cassation filed by Minister of Communication and Information
Technology. Copy of the Supreme Court decision has been delivered by
Administrative Court on September 6, 2013.
Pada tanggal 4 Nopember 2011, Perusahaan mengajukan gugatan baru
terhadap keputusan Kemenkominfo tentang penetapan besaran dan waktu pembayaran
BHP pita frekuensi tahun kedua. Pada tanggal 22 Pebruari 2012, PTUN telah
mengeluarkan salinan putusan yang mengabulkan seluruh gugatan, menunda
pelaksanaan keputusan kemenkominfo sampai ada putusan berkekuatan hukum
tetap, membatalkan objek gugatan dan memerintahkan Kemenkominfo mencabut
objek gugatan dan menerbitkan kepmen baru.
On November 4, 2011, the Company filed a new lawsuit against the decision from
Minister of Communication and Information Technology on determination of the amount
and timing of BHP frequency band payment for the second year. On 22 February 2012,
the Administration court issued a copy of a verdict in which granting all the lawsuits,
delaying the execution of the decision from Minister of Communication and Information
Technology until there is an incracht verdict, aborting the object of the lawsuits
and ordering Minister of Communication and Information Technology to repeal the
object of the lawsuits and issue the new ministerial decree.
Pada tanggal 25 April 2012, Kemenkominfo mengajukan keberatan dengan
mengajukan banding kepada Pengadilan Tinggi Tata Usaha Negara.
On April 25, 2012, The Minister of Communication and Information
Technology submitted an appeal to the State Administrative High Court.
Pada tanggal 10 Juli 2012, Pengadilan Tinggi Tata Usaha Negara mengeluarkan
keputusan yang menguatkan keputusan PTUN. Atas putusan Pengadilan Tinggi
Tata Usaha Negara ini Kemenkominfo tidak mengajukan Kasasi ke Mahkamah Agung,
sehingga Putusan ini telah menjadi keputusan yang berkekuatan hukum tetap.
On July 10, 2012, the State Administrative High Court issue a decision in which
strengthening the Administrative Court decision. Upon this State Administrative
High Court’s decision, Minister of Communication and Information
Technology did not submit the cassation to the Supreme Court which made this
decision became an incracht verdict.