judgment related to the media appropriateness in Unit 3 shows that the mean score of the interface is 4.6 and is categorized as very good. The mean score of the
Audio is 4.6 and is categorized as very good. The mean score of picture and animation is 4.6 and is categorized as good. The mean score of interaction and
feedback is 5 and is categorized as very good. And the last, the mean score of the navigation is 4.75 and is categorized as very good. There is no revision related to
the media appropriateness in Unit 3 final draft. The detailed result can be seen in the table below.
Table 47:The Evaluation of Media Appropriateness Unit 3 Final Draft
D. Interface
No. Statement
Score
13 The composition and size of the titles, illustrations,
buttons, etc. are proportional and have a good balance to the content.
5
14 The color of the titles, illustrations, buttons, etc. is in
harmony, and emphasizing its function. 5
15 The shift of the slides is smooth.
5 16
The text type used is readable. 4
17 The word art use is not too much.
4
Mean
4.6
E. Audio
18 The music instrument supports the materials
presentation. 5
19 The volume of the music instrument is appropriate.
5 20
The music instrument is not distracting the vocabulary learning.
4
Mean 4.6
F. Picture and Animation
21 The pictures are suitable for the materials.
5 22
The picture arrangement is appropriate 4
23 The picture shape, color, size, and proportion are
realistic. 5
24 The pictures usedare consistent cartoonrealistic
5 25
The animations work properly. 4
Mean
4.6
G. Interaction and Feedback
26 The interactive multimedia is user friendly.
5 27
The user can choose unit learning which match 5
In conclusion, based on the expert judgment of the final draft, the interactive vocabulary learning multimedia for seventh grade students of SMP N
15 Yogyakarta entitled Vocabrilliant is appropriate. All the overall mean scores related to the content appropriateness and media appropriateness in Unit 1, Unit 2
and Unit 3 is categorized as very good. It is then ready to be used by the students in the next phase which is implementation.
8. Implementation
After the final draft was evaluated and validated by the expert, the implementation phase was conducted. The implementation phase was conducted
on 4th of January 2016. The implementation phase took place in the library of SMP N 15 Yogyakarta at 10.00
– 11.00 WIB. The implementation was in the form of small group try-out. There were six students involved in the
implementation phase. They were asked to try the interactive multimedia. They were also asked to fill the questionnaires to measure the appropriateness of the
interactive multimedia. There were three questionnaires distributed to each student to measure the appropriateness related to the content and media of Unit 1,
Unit 2, and Unit 3. hisher want and necessity.
28 The interactive multimedia can correct answers.
5 29
The interactive multimedia can evaluate the learning result.
5
Mean 5
H. Navigation
30 There are buttons to move to particular scene or
frame. 5
31 The buttons work properly.
5 32
The placement of the navigation system is consistent. 4
33 The function of the buttons is clear.
5
Mean 4.75
Total Score 99
Overall Mean Score 4.7
