Table 19:The Evaluation of Interaction and Feedback Unit 1 G.
Interaction and Feedback
26 The interactive multimedia is student friendly.
5 27
The student can choose unit learning which match hisher want and necessity.
5 28
The interactive multimedia can correct answers. 5
29 The interactive multimedia can evaluate the learning
result. 5
Mean
5
Table 20:The Evaluation of Navigation Unit 1 H.
Navigation
30 There are buttons to move to particular scene or frame.
5 31
The buttons work properly. 2
32 The placement of the navigation system is consistent.
4 33
The function of the buttons is clear. 4
Mean 3.75
Table 21:The Revision of Media Unit 1 Unit
Evaluation Revision
Unit 1 The audio instrument is not
working properly Replacing the audio instrument
file. The home buttons in the drill
part is not working. Fixing the home buttons.
The scoring in the evaluation part in slide 22 is incorrect.
Correcting the score.
b. Unit 2
1. Content The expert judgment result showed that the overall mean score of the
content appropriateness in Unit 2 was 4.6. Thus, the content appropriateness in Unit 1 is valid and appropriate. More detailed, the result of the expert judgment
related to the content appropriateness in Unit 2 showed that the mean score of the materials coverage is 4.5 and is categorized as very good, the mean score of the
language appropriateness is 5 and is categorized as very good, and the mean score
of the materials presentation is 5 and is also categorized as very good. Meanwhile, due to the comment and suggestions from the expert, there were some revisions
that should be made in the Unit 2. The expert suggested adding some variations of drill and a form of drill which involves the use of sentences, not only a single
vocabulary. Furthermore, the expert suggested replacing the word “bright skin”
into “fair skin”, and “thin body” into “slim body”
Table 22:The Evaluation of Materials Coverage Unit 2 A.
Materials Coverage No.
Statement Score
1 The materials developed are in line with the core
competency. 5
2 The materials developed are in line with the basic
competency. 5
3 The materials texts, pictures, etc. are relevant with the
topic discussed. 4
4 The materials are sufficient.
4
Mean
4.5
Table 23:The Evaluation of Language Appropriateness Unit 2 B.
Language Appropriateness
5 The language used generally is appropriate for the
student. 5
6 The messages delivered are clear and understandable.
5 7
The grammar is appropriate. 5
8 The spelling is appropriate.
5
Mean 5
Table 24:The Evaluation of Materials Presentation Unit 2 C.
Materials Presentation
9 The presentation of the materials is well arranged.
5 10
The presentation of the materials is attractive. 5
11 The “learning with game” concept can help students to
learn vocabulary. 4
12 The “learning with game” concept can increase
students’ interest to learn vocabulary. 4
Mean 4.5
Table 25:The Revision of Content Unit 2 Unit
Evaluation Revision
Unit 1 Lack of variation in activity
Adding 3 new games which are spaceship game, crossword
game, and hangman game. Lack of sentence use.
Adding jumbled
sentence game.
The word “bright skin” in the
input, drill, and evaluation part should be replaced with “fair
skin” Replacing the word.
The word “thin body” in the input, drill, and evaluation part
should be replaced with “slim body”
Replacing the word.
2. Media The expert judgment result showed that the overall mean score of the
media appropriateness in Unit 2 is 4. Thus, the media appropriateness in Unit 2 is categorized as good, valid and appropriate. More detailed, the result of the expert
judgment related to the media appropriateness in Unit 1 showed that the mean score of the interface is 4.8 and is categorized as very good. The mean score of the
Audio is 1 and is categorized as very poor. The mean score of picture and animation is4.4 and is categorized as very good. The mean score of interaction
and feedback is 5 and is categorized as very good. And the last, the mean score of the navigation is 3.75 and is categorized as good.
Moreover, due to the comment and suggestions from the expert, there were some revisions that should be made inUnit 1 related to the media
appropriateness. The expert suggested replacing the audio instrument since the file is broken and unable to be played. The expert also suggested fixing the
hyperlink in Unit 2 home since it was not working properly. There is also a try again button in slide 67 which was not working properly.
Table 26:The Evaluation of Interface Unit 2 D.
Interface No.
Statement Score
13 The composition and size of the titles, illustrations,
buttons, etc. are proportional and have a good balance to the content.
5
14 The color of the titles, illustrations, buttons, etc. is in
harmony, and emphasizing its function. 5
15 The shift of the slides is smooth.
5 16
The text type used is readable. 5
17 The word art use is not too much.
4
Mean 4.8
Table 27:The Evaluation of Audio Unit 2 E.
Audio
18 The
music instrument
supports the
materials presentation.
1 19
The volume of the music instrument is appropriate. 1
20 The music instrument is not distracting the vocabulary
learning. 1
Mean 1
Table 28:The Evaluation of Picture and Animation Unit 2 F.
Picture and Animation
21 The pictures are suitable for the materials.
5 22
The picture arrangement is appropriate 4
23 The picture shape, color, size, and proportion are
realistic. 5
24 The pictures usedare consistent cartoonrealistic
4 25
The animations work properly. 4
Mean 4.4
Table 29:The Evaluation of Interaction and Feedback Unit 2 G.
Interaction and Feedback
26 The interactive multimedia is student friendly.
5 27
The student can choose unit learning which match 5
hisher want and necessity. 28
The interactive multimedia can correct answers. 5
29 The interactive multimedia can evaluate the learning
result. 5
Mean 5
Table 30:The Evaluation of Navigation Unit 2 H.
