Proceeding of 2013 International Seminar on Climate Change and Food Security ISCCFS 2013
Palembang, South Sumatra -Indonesia, 24-25 October,2013
30
4.4. Institutional Performance
Institutional performance related to SISKA program consisted of Cooperative performance and Farmer groups performance. PT. Andira Agro have 5 Village Unit Cooperative KUD, namely the KUD Permata
established in 2000 with 350 members, KUD Sumber Makmur Jaya, Jaya KUD Kumbang Jaya initiated on 1998 with 375 members, KUD Subur Mulia and KUD Restu Ilahi. This intitution KUD was acting as
the link between farmers and company. The KUD of PT Andira Agro is also quite active and positive influence to farmers and companies. The KUD itself was also over shadowed some farmer groups.
4.4.1. Cooperative Performance The performance aspect was included organizational management, and quality management. The results
showed that there are high- performance criteria organizations, both from the aspects of organization and management. Aspects of the organization was consisted of the establishment the structure, the presence of
members at meetings, and tasks distribution. From the aspect of the organization, it was showed that most 76.6 of respondents said the formation of the structure has been done and speciafied, the presence of
members exceeds qourum, and the existing tasks distribution was done systematicaly and well-executed. The management aspects was consisted of the meeting implementation, the principal books, supporting book,
work plans, and cooperation with other groups. Achievement scores of each indicator both aspects was stated in Table 1.
Table 1. Permata Cooperative Institutional Performance VariabelIndicators
Frequency of resp.answer Average score
Criteria 1
2 3
Organization management 1.Formation of structure
2.Member presence 3.Task distribution
7 14
23 16
30 8,30
2,77 2,53
3,00 High
High High
High
Administrative 1. Meeting
2. Basic bookmanual 3. Supporting bookmanual
4. WorkAction plan 5. Own toolmeans
Total performance organization
28 4
2 30
30 26
30 13,93
2,07 3,0
3,0 2,87
3,0 22,23
High High
High High
High High
High
Description score: 1,00
–
1.66 = low, 1,67
–
2,33 = medium, 2,34
–
3,00 = high
4.4.2 . Potential and Performance Famer Groups Institutional There were 13 farmer groups from
Kumbang Padang Permata
village in partnership with PT Andira Agro. All of the groups was formed by the farmer community, high levels of partisipation active, and
willingness to be a member of the group. These conditions indicate the existence of a high potential to develop the farmer groups as a unit of production and learning among members of the groups.
Farmer groups institutional performance was measured from the aspects of organizational management and administration. The result showed that there are high criteria for management aspects of the
organization. It was means that there were exiting distribution task regularly among farmer in the group, good deal of task, adequate sharing idea contribution. Aspects of administrative management was stated on
medium criteria, which was shown by the monthly meeting, the lack of basic books, lack of owned facilities own, and sistematically the work plan running. Those description was detailed in Table 2.
Proceeding of 2013 International Seminar on Climate Change and Food Security ISCCFS 2013
Palembang, South Sumatra -Indonesia, 24-25 October,2013
31 Table 2. Farmer Groups Institutional Performance
VariabelIndicators Frequency of resp.answer
Average score Criteria
1 2
3
Organization Management 1.Taskworking distribution
2.Commitmentdeal of task-working 3.Idea contribution
9 15
30 21
15 8,17
3,00 2,70
2,47 High
High High
High
Administrative 1. Meeting
2. Basic bookmanual 3. Supporting bookmanual
4. WorkAction plan 5. Own toolmeans
Total farmer groups performance
28 28
30 2
1 4
29 26
2
10,17 2,00
1.07 2,97
2,87 1,13
18,34
High Medium
Low High
High Low
Medium
Description score: 1,00
–
1.66 = low, 1,67
–
2,33 = medium, 2,34
–
3,00 = high
4.4.3.Farmers Perception on SISKA Program Potential SISKA program development could also be viewed from the perception of farmers on SISKA
program, which was measured from few indicators, namely the favorability of Siska program existence, aplicability, and motivation to implement Siska. The results showed that the farmers perception of Siska
program was categorized on high criteria. This is demonstrated by the majority of respondents stated that the existence SISKA Program was favorable, the technology can be applied, and can increase the revenue
because of utilization the palm oil waste. This result was supported by Bangun 2010 which showed that SISKA could increase the farmers income
[10]
.
The other research concluded that SISKA was feasible and potential to be developed both from of economic and non-economic aspect
[11]
.
5. Conclusion
1. Socio-economic conditions of farmers was potential for SISKA program development.
2. Cooperative Institutional Performance
Permata
cooperatives was stated on high criteria. 3.
Farmer group institutional performance was stated on medium category. 4.
Farmers perceptions of SISKA program was stated on positive values.
6. References
[1] Uphoff, N. 1986. Local Institutional Development: An Analytical Sourcebook With Cases . Kumarian Press . [2] Syahyuti. 2003. Bedah konsep Kelembagaan: strategi pengembangan dan penerapannya dalam Penelitian
Pertanian. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian. Bogor.
[3] North, Douglass C .2005. Institutional Economics. httpnobelprice.orgeconomiclaureates1993north- lecture.html.27 April. 2005.
[4] Robin, L., 2005. Institutional Economic. http:www.msu.edu.userschimd bromeley.htm . October 25, 2005. [5] Decree of Minister of Agriculture Number: 273KptsOT.196042007. Jakarta.
[6] Suradisastra , K., 2008. Strategi Pemberdayaan Petani. Forum Agro-Ekonomi, Vol.262. PSE-KP. Hal .82-91. [7] Ostrom , E. 2006. The Institutional Analysis and development framework in historical perspective. Presentation
paper . Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis . USA : Indiana Univercity , Bloomington [8] World Bank, 2005b. Social Capital , Empowermwnt , and Community Driven Development .
http:info.worldbank.orgetoolsPresentationview , asp ? PID = 936 EI D = 482 , May 11, 2005 [9] Purnaningsih, N. 2006. Adopsi Inovasi Pola Kemitraan Agribisnis Sayuran di Provinsi Jawa Barat. Disertasi pada
Program Studi Ilmu Penyuluhan Pembangunan Sekolah Pasca Sarjana , Institut Pertanian Bogor. [10] Bangun, R.2010. Pengembangan Sistem Integrasi Sapi dalam Peningkatan Pendapatan Petani di Provinsi Riau.
Jurnal Teroka Vol 10 No. 2 Agustus 2010.
