Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 4 - 16
18. Monitoring Report of the LARAP Package No.18
: Mukomuko Bts. Sumbar
Province : Bengkulu
A. Previous Status : •
Proposed to be replaced. B. Pending Issues, Concern and Actions
a Proposed to be replaced. C. Update during this reporting month of March 2015
a Still no update during this period. b Proposed to be replaced.
19. Monitoring Report of the LARAP Package No.19
: Lais - Bintunan Province
: Bengkulu
A. Previous Status : •
World Bank issued on May 30, 2014 No Objection Letter NOL on the revised LARAP documents for implementation
• World Bank issued No Objection Letter NOLon Monitoring Report No.1 for the LARAP
implementation. B. Pending Issues, Concern and Actions
a Remaining 177 PAP to be compensated from the 2015 National Budget. C. Update during this reporting month of April 2015
a No update this period.
20. Monitoring Report of the LARAP Package No. 20
: Lubuk Alung - Sicincin Province
: Sumatera Barat
A. Previous Status : •
World Bank issued NOL to LARAP documents on December 19, 2014. B. Pending Issues, Concern and Actions
a LARAP implementation to be implemented by Local Government. C. Update during this reporting month of April 2015.
a Payment of Compensation to PAP is scheduled for May 2015.
21. Monitoring Report of the LARAP Package No. 21
: Lubuk Alung - Kurataji Province
: Sumatera Barat
A. Previous Status : •
World Bank issued NOL to LARAP documents on December 19, 2014. B. Pending Issues, Concern and Actions
a LARAP implementation to be implemented by Local Government.
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 4 - 17
C. Update during this reporting month of April 2015 a Payment of Compensation to PAP is scheduled for May 2015.
4.7 Anti Corruption Issues
4.7.1 Anti Corruption Action Plan ACAP
ACAP for WINRIP was developed from the previous SRIP experiences. Basically, it has the same main components of involving the Community Representative Observers CRO in the bid opening
and Third Party Monitoring TPM during the construction supervision although modification was made on the selection process of the CROs for SRIP. Within this plan there are four main pillars as
indicated separately below
a
Community Representative Observers CRO
b
Publication Disclosure
c
Complaints Handling System CHS
d
Third Party Monitoring TPM
4.7.2 Community Representative Observers CRO
The Community Representative Observers, who are required to observe the actual bidding activities, were appointed for WP-1 group. All of the CROs were university staff, selected in
accordance with the World Bank suggestion to request assistance from local universities. CRO is the independent observer who is not related directly or indirectly to the Contractors,
Consultants, and Suppliers or not be part of the WINRIP s management, and not a member of any political party.
CROs selection procedures: a.
Review the criteria and qualifications of candidates for the CRO. b. Director of Planning, DGH as Chairman of the Project Management Unit, delegated of the
authority to the selection of the CRO to the Head of National Roads Implementation Agency BBPJN Head of Procurement Services Unit Unit Layanan Pengadaan - ULP, hereinafter
referred to as Head of Balai. c.
Head of Balai to invite CRO candidates from the local universities or colleges. d. Selection of CRO to be facilitated by Balai BBPJN Procurement Services Unit Unit Layanan
Pengadaan - ULP. e. Elected CRO and substitute CRO must attend one day training to be conducted by the PMU
CTC WINRIP. f.
Head of Balai to report the result of CRO selection by attaching the Minutes of Election Meeting and send an approval application letter of the CRO to Director of Planning DGH as the
Chairman of PMU. g.
Based on the report and a written request from the Head of Balai, the Director of Planning DGH as the Chairman of PMU must sign a Letter of Agreement and the Decree of the
Establishment of CROs.
Kategori