The st udents‟ listening score was increased because the use of film clips in
the teaching and learning of listening. The following was the comparison of the students‟ listening score in Cycle I and Cycle II.
Table 4: The Comparison of the Students’ Mean Score of Listening in Post- test 1 and Post-test 2
Score Post-test 1
Post-test 2 Improvement
Mean Score 76.4
87.5 11.1
After Cycle II was done, the researcher and the research team reflected the action done. From the implementation of the action in Cycle II, it was revealed
that applying film clips improved the students‟ listening comprehension and the students‟ motivation. The students had fewer mistakes in answering the listening
test and felt easy in understanding the spoken text.
D. The Result of the Research
This section consists of qualitative and quantitative data. The qualitative data deal with the general findings of the research in each cycle, while the quantitative
data present the result of questionnaire toward students‟ motivation and students‟ S1
: Iya Mister, aku kerasa enjoy mendengarkan dan menonton filmnya, kayaknya tu, informasi yang didapat keinget-inget terus.
Hehe.
Yes Mister, I really enjoy the listening process, it’s like the
information that I get always running through my head . Hehe.
S4 : Uhm, sedikit meningkat kayaknya ni Mister. Hee
Uhmm, It is little increase Mister. Hee.
Int-6 April 3
rd
, 2014
listening score. The following were the findings that the researcher obtained in the film clips to improve students‟ listening comprehension:
1. Cycle I Some actions were successful but some others were unsuccessful. The
successful and the unsuccessful actions were reported as follows. a. The successful action
1 Using film clips to comprehend the spoken text was successful. 2
Using new film can improve students‟ motivation in listening process. 3 The students were actively involved in discussion.
b. The Unsuccessful Actions 1 The students got difficulties in memorizing the new vocabulary items.
2 There were some students who did not pay attention during the teaching and learning process. They enjoyed chatting with their friends.
3 They were some students who did not take a part in group work. 2. Cycle II
a The students had good motivation in listening process. b The students could answer the questions based on the film clips correctly and
easily. c All of students took part in listening process.
The results of this research were summarized in the following table.
Table 5: The Summary of the Research in Pre-action, Cycle I, and Cycle II Pre-action
Cycle I Cycle II
1 Many students had low motivation in
listening. 2 Many students were
not enthusiastic in the teaching
learning process.
3 Many students were not actively
involved in discussion.
4 Many students did not pay attention to
the teacher‟s explanation.
5 Many students were not serious in doing
task. 6 Many students did
not understand certain component,
purpose, and the language features of
a narrative text.
7 Many students were not able to identify
the generic structure of a narrative text.
8 Many students had difficulties in
answering the questions based on
the text. 1 Some students were
not interested in listening
2 Some students were enthusiastic in the
teaching learning process.
3 Some students were actively involved in
discussion.
4 Some students paid attention to the
teacher‟s explanation.
5 Some students were not serious in doing
task.
6 Some students understood certain
component, purpose, and the
language features of a narrative text.
7 Some students were able to identify the
generic structure of a narrative text.
8 Some students made fewer mistakes in
answering the questions.
1 Many students were interested in
listening
2 Many students were enthusiastic in the
teaching learning process.
3 Many students were actively involved in
discussion.
4 Many students paid attention to the
teacher‟s explanation.
5 Many students were serious in doing
task. 6 Many students
understood certain component,
purpose, and the language features of
a narrative text.
7 Many students were able to identify the
generic structure of a narrative text.
8 Many students answered the
questions correctly.
3. The Students‟ Listening Score
In this part, the researcher discusses the result of st udents‟ score as performed
in Pre- test, Cycle I, and Cycle II. The discussion deals with students‟ mean score.
Here the researcher presents the general finding of students‟ score in listening obtained in Pre-test, Cycle I, and Cycle II as follows.
Table 6: Students mean score of listening in Pre-test, Cycle I, and Cycle II Score
Pre-test Post-test 1
Post-test 2 Mean Score
68.7 76.4
87.5
Table 6 showed an increase of the value of the mean score of listening obtained by students from Pre-test, Cycle I, and Cycle II. The result of the
analysis of students‟ score in Pre-action shows that the mean score is 68.7, in Cycle I the mean score is 76.4, and in Cycle II the mean score is 87.5.
E. Categorization of Cycle I
