Monthly Progress Report May 2013
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 17
4.6 Environmental and Social Considerations 4.6.1 Current Overall Situation
A project category is assigned to each package as either Category A, B or C depending on the likely degree of influence on environmental issues with a
brief explanation as follows.
Category A project is one which will have a significant negative impact on the environment and may have an influence on areas outside the actual project area.
A project classified as such requires an AMDAL ANDAL, RKLRPL study.
Category B project is one which affects the people or the environment to some extent but with a smaller impact than a Category A. The required environmental
analysis is a UKLUPL study only.
Category C project has minimal effect on the people or environment and an environmental analysis is not required. Standard operational procedures SOP are
used to handle any minor problem which may arise.
Details of packages that require environmental and social safeguards are given in Appendix D.
The following table provides a summary of the work involved are 21 packages.
Works Program
No of Packag
es Investigations
Approved by Remarks
Nos Documents
BLH World Bank
AWP-1 4
8 SPPL 4
Full LARAP 4 4
SPPL 4
Full LARAP NOLs have been issued
by WB, except for SPPL.
AWP-2 8
17 Simple LARAP 1
Full LARAP 8 AMDAL Study 4
UKLUPL 4 4
UKLUPL Full LARAP
1 one AMDAL Study for three packages of AWP-2
and AWP-3 Package Nos. 7, 12 and 14.
1 one AMDAL Study for two packages of AWP-2
and AWP-3 Packages No.11 16.
AWP-3 9
14 Full LARAP 8
AMDAL Study 1 UKLUPL 5
5 UKLUPL
Full LARAP
Total 21
39 13
4
4.6.2 Monitoring of Environmental Aspects During Construction
CTC will circulate of environmental monitoring forms to DSC. This set of forms focused on environmental and social impacts, and amounted to 7 pages. These
forms were intended to be used every month by the DSC Environmental Specialist.
CTC’s environmental staff will actively advise to DSC on environmental monitoring, but have not directly carried out monitoring, despite the CTC TOR requirement to “to
implement the Environmental and Social Assessment and Management Plan for WINRIP”, which involves monitoring of environmental plans and studies.
Monthly Progress Report May 2013
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 18
After finalizing the Standard Environmental Clauses SEC, CTC assisted Subdit Environmental Affairs to produce monitoring forms covering all aspects of the
technical specifications, and introduced them to participants of environmental training including P2JN, Project Manager, DSC, Contractors, Pokja etc. There are 69 pages
of forms, covering all aspects of construction.
4.6.3 Design Integration, Road Safety aspects and Monitoring of Environmental
Studies Task 5.8.0 of CTC-2 TOR Implement the Environmental Sosial Assessment and
Management PlanESAMP and Para 10.9 of the PMM requires ensuring that environmental management aspects of contracts have been implemented in
accordance with AMDAL, UKLUPL, SPPL studies and Environmental issues will integrated to design, Prepare environmental mitigation on construction stage for
contractor Contractor Program for Executing Environmental Managemen Plan CPEMPRKPPL. Therefore CTC will propose to visit the site of projects subject to
studies or issues, and ensure that the plans are being implemented. A schedule for these visits is still in process.
4.7 Anti Corruption Issues 4.7.1 Anti Corruption Action Plan ACAP
ACAP for WINRIP was developed from the previous SRIP experiences. Basically, it has the same main components of involving the Community Representative
Observers CRO in the bid opening and Third Party Monitoring TPM during the construction supervision although modification was made on the selection process of
the CROs for SRIP. Within this plan there are four main pillars as indicated separately below
a
Community Representative Observers CRO
b
Publication Disclosure
c
Complaints Handling System CHS
d
Third Party Monitoring TPM
4.7.2 Community Representative Observers CRO
The Community Representative Observers, required to observe the actual bid opening, were appointed for WP-1 group. All of the CROs were university staff, selected in
accordance with the World Bank suggestion to request assistance from local universities.
CRO is the independent observer who is not related directly or indirectly to the Contractors, Consultants, and Suppliers or not be part of the WINRIP’s management,
and not a member of any political party.
CROs selection procedures: a. Review the criteria and qualifications of candidates for the CRO.
b. Director of Planning, DGH as Chairman of the Project Management Unit, delegated of the authority to the selection of the CRO to the Head of National
