Horn, L. R., Ward, G. 2006. Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell Publisher Ltd.
Hurford, J. R., Heasley, B. 2007. Semantics: A Coursebook 2
nd
Ed.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Khoo, C. S., Na, J. C. 2007. Semantic Relation in Information Source. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology
, 401:157-228. Kovecses, Z. 2010. Metaphor. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kreidler, C. W. 1998. Introducing English Semantics. London: Routledge. Lakoff, G., Johnsen, M. 2003. Metaphors We Live By. London: The University
of Chicago Press. Leech, G. 1981. Semantics: The Study of Meaning. New York: Penguin Books
Ltd. Mirkin, S. 2011. Context and Discourse in Textual Entailment Inference. Ph. D.
Thesis . Ramat Gan: Department of Computer Science, Bar-Ilan
University.
Moleong, L. J. 2010. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Revised Ed.. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Murphy, M. L. 2003. Semantic Relations and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nouwen, R. 2011. Foundation of Semantics I: Truth-conditions, entailment and logic. Generative Initiative in Syntactic Theory, February March.
Roeper, T. 2011. How the Emergence of Prepositions Separates Strict Interfence from General Inference. Proceedings of Sinn Bedeutung 15, pp. 1
–21. Sa‟adah, H. 2014. A Semantic Analysis of Entailment Applied by the Main
Character in the Movie Life of Pi. A Thesis. Yogyakarta: English Language and Literature, FBS Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Stilwell, P. J. 1999. Pragmatics. London: Routledge. Trask, R. L. 1999. Key Concepts in Language and Linguistics. London:
Routledge. 2007. Language and Linguistics. New York: Routledge.
Vanderstoep, S. W., Johnston, D. D. 2009. Research Methods for Everyday Life: Blending Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches.
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Yule, G. 1998. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2010. The Study of Language 4
th
Ed.. New York: Cambridge University Press.
B. Electronic Sources
Bizzoni, Y., Dobnik, S. 2016. Distributional Semantic Models for Detection of Textual Entailment. University of Gothenburg: Conference Paper, 17-18
November. http:www.gu.seenglishresearchpublication?publicationId=249970
. Retrieved on March, 9
th
2017. Imdb. 2006. The Da Vinci Code Movie.
http:www.imdb.comtitlett0382625 .
Retrieved on March 20
th
, 2017. Jafar, A. A. 2011. Entailment and Presupposition.
http:www.uobabylon.edu.iquobcolegesfilesharearticlesEntailment20 20Presupposition.pdf
. Retrieved on March 15
th
, 2017 Pennacchiotti, M. 2005.
“Textual Entailment”. Artificial Intelligence Research Group.
http:art.uniroma2.itresearchte . Retrieved on March 15
th
, 2017. Sony Pictures. 2006. The Da Vinci Code Movie.
http:www.sonypictures.commoviesthedavincicode . Retrieved on
October 25
th
, 2016. Winter, Y. 2016. Elements of Formal Semantics. An Introduction to the
Mathematical Theory
of Meaning
in Natural
Language. http:www.phil.uu.nl~yoadefsmain.html
. Retrieved on March 9
th
, 2017. YIFY Subtitles. 2006. The Da Vinci Code Movie English Subtitle.
http:www.yifysubtitles.comsubtitlesthe-da-vinci-code-2006-english- yify-9694
. Retrieved on September 22
nd
, 2016.
Appendix A. Data Sheet of Types and Orders of Entailment, and Approaches to Detect Entailment in The Da Vinci Code Movie
Notes : No
: Datum Number BE
: Background Entailment CC
: Contexted Clause OE
: One-way Entailment FE
: Foreground Entailment CM
: Context Matching TE
: Two-wayMutual Entailment CL
: Clefting NE
: Negative Entailment ST
: Stressing ME
: Metaphorical Entailment the words stressed are capitalized
84
No Data
Types of Entailment Orders of
Entailment Approaches
Explanation OE
TE NE
ME
BE FE
CC CM
CL ST
1. Longdon: SYMBOLS are a
language that can help us understand our past.
As the saying goes,
a picture says a thousand words.
But which words? Interpret for me, please, this symbol. First
thing that comes to mind. √
√ √
Longdon states on his presentation that if symbol can help people to understand the past, a symbol must be
something which can say a thousand words . However,
something which can say a thousand words is not always
a symbol. So, the bold sentences can be classified as one- way entailment as they entail in one direction. Therefore,
the speaker, Longdon, stresses the word symbol as he wants the listeners to be more focused on it. Therefore, in
order to detect the entailment, contexted clause approach is applied by identifying the occurrence of flattening
between the sentences. As a result, the first sentence is flattened in the second sentence, so entailment is detected.
2. Longdon: That is his TRIDENT. A
symbol of power to millions of the ancients
. Now this symbol. √
√ √
When Robert Longdon shows a painting of Poseidon holding a trident, he states the trident is a symbol of
power. The thickened sentences entail each other in two- way because both sentences paraphrase each other.
Therefore, Longdon stresses the word trident in order to show that he wants the hearers to pay attention to this
word because this word is the most important part of the current discussion. Moreover, the capitalized word has a
relation with the word power, even though both cannot
