97
No Data
Types of Entailment Orders of
Entailment Approaches
Explanation OE
TE NE
ME
BE FE
CC CM
CL ST
31. Longdon: You dont believe in God. Naveu: No. I dont believe in some
magic from the sky . Just people.
Sometimes that they can be kind. √
√ √
If Naveu does not believe in God, she also does not believe in some magic from the sky
because God, for some people, is a magic from the sky. Thus, the sentences are
paraphrased. On the other hand, the entailment is expressed in negative form. As God, in this context,
means a magic from the sky ; both sentences have a
bondrelation on the background which orders both sentences to be entail one another. Furthermore, the words
God is interrelated to the word sky, but God does not
mean sky. From both words, a sign of entailment can be detected using context matching approach.
32. Naveu: A CRYPTEX, they are used to keep secrets.
Its da Vincis design.
√ √
√ Naveu holds something on her hand. From her statements,
it can be inferred that if the thing she is holding is a cryptex which is used to keep secret; it must be da Vinci’s
design. Yet, da Vinci‟s design does not necessarily to be a
cryptex, but probably something else. That is the reason why the sentences uttered by Naveu are entailing one
another. Naveu stresses the word cryptex as it is very unique; it becomes the concern of her utterances. In
accordance, the stressing becomes the order of entailment on her sentences. Moreover, because, the word cryptex is
explained on the next sentence; flattening happens, and contexted clause approach is employed in detecting the
entailment.
33. Capt B. Fache: Vernet, André.
It seems youre not a driver AT ALL.
Apparently, you lost your tongue along with your truck.
Aiding and √
√ √
Captain B. Fache mocks Vernet by saying that if he is not driver at all, he must be losing his tongue along with his
truck because on the previous scene, Vernet acted like a
truck driver to conceal Longdon and Naveu inside of the
98
No Data
Types of Entailment Orders of
Entailment Approaches
Explanation OE
TE NE
ME
BE FE
CC CM
CL ST
abetting two murder suspects. That
carries jail time. truck. However, Longdon and Naveu are finaaly escaped
with the truck, and Vernet ended up in the hospital when Captain B. Fache visits him. As can be seen, the bold
sentences have one-way entailment relation because if Vernet lost his tongue and his truck, does not mean that he
is not a driver, even though he is not a driver in the movie. Captain B. Fache also emphasizes that Vernet is not a
driver by adding at all in the first bold sentence. It indicates the use of clefting as foreground orders the
entailment. In addition, the first sentence is explained more on the second sentence in which flattening happens.
The occurrence of flattening triggers the application of contexted clause approach to detect the entailment.
34. Leigh Teabing: Oh, hardly, no.
He was a lifelong pagan who was baptized on his deathbed.
CONSTANTINE was Romes supreme holy man.
√ √
√
Leigh Teabing explains Longdon and Naveu that CONSTANTINE was Romes supreme holy man, and He
was a lifelong pagan who was baptized on his deathbed. The sentences imply each other‟s truth, so the type of
entailment that can be seen is two-way entailment. Leigh Teabing stresses Constantine as he is the main topic of the
current discussion; Teabing wants the listeners to pay more attention to Constantine. Also, both sentences share
the same knowledge to describe Constantine, which is the requirement of background entailment. As the first
sentence is explained on the second one by flattening; contexted clause approach employed.
35. Leigh Teabing: And in 325 Anno
Domini, he decided to unify Rome under a single religion,
√ √
√ From Leigh Teabing utterances, one-way entailment can
be seen because if Anno Domini decided to unify Rome under a single religion
is true; it cannot be denied that
