3.216 3.335
3.05 3.282
3.386
1 2
3 4
Rata - Rata
Sumber : Data Primer
Kurang Sedang Tinggi Skala 1 - 4
Hasil Pengukuran Variabel Eksogen
Motivasi kerja Komitmen kerja
Etos kerja Apresiasi kerja
Budaya kerja
GFI 0.80, 0.90 marginal fit, 4 Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index AGFI ≥ 0.90 ≤ 0.80 AGFI, 0.90
marginal fit, and 5 Comparative Fit Index CFI ≥ 0.90 normed Fit Index NFI ≥ 0.90
[ 6
]
4. Research Results and Discussion
4.1 Results
of the
test construct validity by CFA
The model developed builds work character involving a variable: work commitments x1, work
ethic x2, appreciation of work x3, the work culture x4, motivation z and work readiness
y. Viewed the work readiness of intrapersonal aspects, namely: self-confidence y1, responsibility
y2, discipline y3, mentality Y4, honesty y5, power
struggle y6,
and compliance
Y7. Manifesto of the interpersonal aspects of competitiveness
y8, adaptation
y9, communication Y10, cooperation Y11, and
leadership Y12. The results of data analysis described in three
parts: 1 The test instrument to determine the feasibility of the questionnaire used, 2 data
description to describe the characteristics of the study variables, and 3 Test SEM to evaluate the
acceptance of respondents to the model, and prove whether the model can work affect job readiness .
4.1.1 Internal Validity
The evaluation of the ability to manifest in reflecting the latent variable were tested with
confirmatory factor analysis CFA. His ability demonstrated by the coefficient lambda-owned, and
meaning as manifest by the t-count. The higher value reflects the stronger the signal of lambda, and
the higher the t-calculated value indicates the more meaningful
or significant.
Manifest latent
confidence table 1 has a lambda value of 0.68 and a t-square 5.39 count lambda 0.68 ² = 0.4624
46.24 describes the contribution of reflected self-confidence. While the acquisition of t-count of
more than 1.96 indicates significant
[ 4
] . So the first
declared invalid
manifest with
46.24 contribution.
Table 1. Testing Results CFA Latent Confidence
Variabel Manifes
lambda t-hitung
Keterangan Confident
Y1 0.68
Ref significant
Y2 0.72
4.84 significant
Y3 0.58
6.45 significant
Y4 0.61
6.20 significant
Figure 2. Histogram Comparison Average Exogenous
The highest score is the work motivation, whereas the lowest score is the work ethic, followed
later work
culture, job commitment,
work appreciation. So aspects of sincerity, thoroughness,
enthusiasm, spirit and optimism in seriousness, the superior work gets priority for improvement. The
second priority is the cultural aspects of work: cooperation, just-in-time, quality control, honest
and 5S attitude. Student responses can also be explained
individually through categorization. Distribution of responses obtained in the variable work motivation:
as much as 81.15 of students categorized scores high motivation, the other quite as much as
18.85 categorized. Not found scores of students who lack motivation or low works. Variable work
commitment and appreciation of the work also has a characteristic distribution with a majority of the
high category, the work commitments 65.57 and
61
62.30 appreciation of the
work. Thus the motivation,
commitment and appreciation of
work, a high response in the aggregate, and students give a high response. Variable work ethic and work
culture of the majority, as much as 67.21 in the variable work ethic, and 52.46 in the work
culture.
Table 2. Testing Results CFA Latent Confidence
Variabel Manifes
lambda t-hitung
description confidents
Y1 0.68
Ref Significant
Y2 0.72
4.84 Significant
Y3 0.58
6.45 Significant
Y4 0.61
6.20 Significant
The manifest also declared invalid the other latent signified by the t-count of more than
1.96. Means that all manifests are used to reflect the latent proven to function properly, so it does not do
the removal or replacement of the manifest in the questionnaire.
4.1.2 Construct Reliability
The manifest can be viewed as a form of oerational indicators that reflect a latent variable, so
that conceptually manifest latent in a set of measuring the same universe. However universe
or nature unidimensi. However, the empirical level, this similarity is not necessarily agreed upon by
the participants, and he viewed not as unidimensi.
Empirical evaluation of the nature-manifes to unidimensi can be done based on a latent construct
reliability coefficient ≥ 0.7 signifies the acquisition is
unidimensi or reliable. The results
of the calculation of the confidence variable reliability
coefficient values obtained for 0744, the acquisition is ≥ 0.7 signifies unidimensi or have an acceptable
construct reliability. Manifesto of the other latent variables also have construct reliability coefficient
0.7, indicating that unidimensi be declared reliabel. Based
on these
results, all the
subs manifest variables declared readiness work reliable i
n measuring its latent.
4.1.3 Testing Descriptive
Scores the answer is the response of participants against some proposed variables,
namely: work commitment, work ethic, appreciation of work, work culture, motivation, and job
readiness. In general, the higher scores indicate better, and the lower the mean the opposite. In
accordance with the scale of the answers are used, scores will be in the range 1-4.
4.1.3.1 Exogenous Variables
Scores of
variables measuring
work commitment between 2,32 – 3,80 with an average of
3,28. 2,32 is the result of the lowest scores of all participants was measured on a scale of 1-4 interpret
the respondents with the level of motivation to work less than moderate. While 3,80 is the highest yield
scores that show the presence of respondents with high motivation. The average for
3 shows in general of all respondents already have a high
motivation to work. The results of measurements on other exogenous also obtain the mean scores on all
3.
Figure 3. Endogenous Variable Histogram
The majority of participants have a job readiness categorized simply by the ammount reached
68.03, the next largest categorized as 16.36 less, then high-low as much as 13.93 and 1.64
see table 3.
3 .2
1 5
2 .9
2 6
3 .1
5 3
2 .6
4 1
2 .8
4 2
2 .7
5 1
2 .7
9 9
3 .2
3 2
.9 8
6 2
.7 6
2 .7
6 2
.7 4
9 2
.8 9
9
T o
ta l
K e
s ia
p a
n K
e rj
a
1 2
3 4
R a
ta -
R a
ta
Sumber : Data Primer
Skala 1 - 4
Hasil Pengukuran Variabel Endogen
Percaya diri Tanggung jawab
Disiplin Mental
Kejujuran Daya juang
Kepatuhan Daya saing
Adaptasi Komunikasi
Kerjasama Kepemimpinan
Kesiapan kerja
62
