73 distributing questionnaire as well as the materials to some participants who were
considered expert and had enough experience in teaching and learning English. The questionnaire included three parts. The first part was descriptions of
participants. The second was the Data Presentation and Analysis. The third was the participants’ comments, feedback, and suggestions. The data obtained for the
designed materials were presented as follows:
a. Descriptions of Participants
The participants were two English Language Education lecturers, two English teachers of SMK Negeri 1 Klaten, and one English instructor of Lembaga
Bahasa Sanata Dharma University. The participants were expected to give their feedback, comments, and suggestions toward the materials for improvements of
the materials. The participants’ identity gender, educational background, and
teaching experience were described in this part. Table 4.4 is the presentation of Descriptions of participants.
Table 4.4 Description of the Research Participants Group of
Participants No.
Gender Educational
Background Teaching Experience
in year F
M S1
S2 S3
1-5 6-10
10-15 16-20
20
English Language
Education lecturers of
Sanata Dharma University
1. √
√ √
2. √
√ √
English teachers of SMK Negeri 1
Klaten 1.
√ √
√ 2.
√ √
√
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
74
Group of Participants
No. Gender
Educational Background
Teaching Experience in year
F M
S1 S2
S3 1-5
6-10 10-15
16-20 20
Engish instructor of Lembaga
Bahasa Sanata Dharma
University 1.
√ √
√
Total 4
1 3
2 1
3 1
b. Data Presentation and Analysis
This part presents the participants’ opinions of the appropriateness of the materials in the form of descriptive statistics. The participants were expected to
give their opinions by indicating the degree of agreement. Table 4.5 shows the degree of agreement to evaluate the materials.
Table 4.5 Degree of Agreement Degree of Agreement
Meaning
1 Strongly disagree
2 Disagree
3 Agree
4 Strongly disagree
The data presentation of the evaluation can be seen in Table 4.6.
Table 4.6 Descriptive Statistics of Participants’ Opinion on the Designed
Materials No.
Participants’ Opinion on … Central Tendency
N Mn
Mdn Md
1. The indicators are well formulated.
5 3
3 3
2. The materials are relevant to the basic
competence and competence standard. 5
3 3
3 3.
The materials match with the indicators. 5
3 3
3 4.
The indicators help students achieve the basic competence and competence standard.
5 3
3 3
5. The materials are relevant to the topic in each
unit. 5
3 3
3 6.
The instructions are clear and well stated. 5
3 3
3 7.
The materials are appropriate with students’ level of English competency.
5 3
3 3
8. The materials and activities help students
5 3.2
3 3
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
75
No. Participants’ Opinion on …
Central Tendency N
Mn Mdn
Md
improve the four skills listening, speaking, reading, and writing.
9. The activities in the materials are appropriate
with Gardner’s theory of Multiple Intelligences linguistic, logical mathematic, spatialvisual,
musical, bodilykinesthetic, interpersonal, intrapersonal, naturalistic.
5 3
3 3
10. The activities are able to help students learn
using their intelligences. 5
3 3
3 11.
The activities are able to stimulate students to use their intelligences.
5 3
3 3
12. The activities are interesting and motivating
for students to learn English. 5
3 3
3 13.
The layouts of the designed materials are attractive.
5 3.4
3 3
14. The materials and activities are various.
5 3.2
3 3
15. The materials being designed are well-
arranged according to the level of difficulty. 5
3 3
3 16.
The materials are well elaborated. 5
3 3
3
Note:
N : Number of participants
Mdn : Median Mn
: Mean Md
: Modus The data presentation showed that the average point of the degree of
agreement for the designed materials evaluation was from 3 up to 3.4 out of scale range of 1 up to 4. It indicated that the designed materials were acceptable and
appropriate to be used and applied in SMK Negeri 1 Klaten Grade XI, Administration Department.
c. Participants’ Comments and Suggestions
