75
No. Participants’ Opinion on …
Central Tendency N
Mn Mdn
Md
improve the four skills listening, speaking, reading, and writing.
9. The activities in the materials are appropriate
with Gardner’s theory of Multiple Intelligences linguistic, logical mathematic, spatialvisual,
musical, bodilykinesthetic, interpersonal, intrapersonal, naturalistic.
5 3
3 3
10. The activities are able to help students learn
using their intelligences. 5
3 3
3 11.
The activities are able to stimulate students to use their intelligences.
5 3
3 3
12. The activities are interesting and motivating
for students to learn English. 5
3 3
3 13.
The layouts of the designed materials are attractive.
5 3.4
3 3
14. The materials and activities are various.
5 3.2
3 3
15. The materials being designed are well-
arranged according to the level of difficulty. 5
3 3
3 16.
The materials are well elaborated. 5
3 3
3
Note:
N : Number of participants
Mdn : Median Mn
: Mean Md
: Modus The data presentation showed that the average point of the degree of
agreement for the designed materials evaluation was from 3 up to 3.4 out of scale range of 1 up to 4. It indicated that the designed materials were acceptable and
appropriate to be used and applied in SMK Negeri 1 Klaten Grade XI, Administration Department.
c. Participants’ Comments and Suggestions
The result of the evaluation in preliminary field testing had showed that the designed materials were already acceptable. However, there were some
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
76 comments and suggestions from respondents who evaluated the materials for the
improvement of the materials. Comments and suggestions were given for student’s book as well as for teacher’s manuals.
There were some comments from the evaluators toward the designed materials. First comment was that the layout was very good. Second comment, the
materials were reader friendly. They were concise and clear purpose and instructions. Then, the designed materials were excellent. There were many kinds
of game that could make students happy. The fourth comment, the materials could encourage the students to be creative and innovative. There was also a comment
that the materials were amazing because they were quite well arranged based on the basic competencies to meet its indicators. Another one was that the activities
were various and interesting. It would create a good mood and motivate students to learn more. The materials were also commented that they were good to had
reflection in the end of every unit. The last comment, the materials were good to include some activities which employ students
’ MI. The evaluators of the designed materials also gave some suggestions for
Student’s Book. The first, the researcher or the researcher of the materials should check the grammar, diction, phrasal verbs, and preposition again. There were still
some mistakes although they were not fatal ones. Then, the researcher should check again the instructions in each section, especially game section. Next, some
examples especially in grammar part were not in the same context with the discussed topic. Therefore, it should be revised to suit the topic. Another
suggestion was that it would be better to give or mention what intelligences that
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
77 students were actually learning in some activities, so they would realize what the
activity was created for. Then, there should be additional time for games part considering the number of the students. Next suggestion was that answers key
should not be in or separated from the Student’s Book. Giving more explanation
about grammar became the last suggestion. Those were the partici
pants’ comments and suggestions toward the designed materials for students. Then, for the Teacher’s Manuals, the respondents’
also gave their comments and suggestions. Related to the instructions and guidelines for teacher in each activity, all respondents agreed that they were clear
and well arranged. Then, there were some comments and suggestions for Teacher’s Manuals. Firstly, there were still some mistakes grammar and diction.
Secondly, the instructions should be simplified. Lastly, it was clear and practical.
5. The Result of Main Product Revision
