Plot ACF dan PACF Data Harga Minyak Pada Data Level

Sum squared resid 0.758516 Schwarz criterion -2.324541 Log likelihood 169.9982 Hannan-Quinn criter. -2.349255 F-statistic 90.16272 Durbin-Watson stat 1.980212 ProbF-statistic 0.000000

5. Data Varians Harga Minyak

Level Null Hypothesis: RSR has a unit root Exogenous: Constant Lag Length: 0 Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=13 t-Statistic Prob. Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -9.495405 0.0000 Test critical values: 1 level -3.476805 5 level -2.881830 10 level -2.577668 MacKinnon 1996 one-sided p-values. Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation Dependent Variable: DRSR Method: Least Squares Date: 080312 Time: 14:11 Sample adjusted: 2000M03 2011M12 Included observations: 142 after adjustments Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob. RSR-1 -0.776717 0.081799 -9.495405 0.0000 C 0.005519 0.006196 0.890749 0.3746 R-squared 0.391735 Mean dependent var 0.000859 Adjusted R-squared 0.387390 S.D. dependent var 0.094043 S.E. of regression 0.073607 Akaike info criterion -2.366172 Sum squared resid 0.758516 Schwarz criterion -2.324541 Log likelihood 169.9982 Hannan-Quinn criter. -2.349255 F-statistic 90.16272 Durbin-Watson stat 1.980212 ProbF-statistic 0.000000 Lampiran 2

1.2. Plot ACF dan PACF Data Harga Minyak Pada Data Level

Date: 080312 Time: 14:14 Sample: 2000M01 2011M12 Included observations: 144 Autocorrelation Partial Correlation AC PAC Q-Stat Prob .| .| 1 0.939 0.939 129.72 0.000 .|| |. | 2 0.853 -0.247 237.51 0.000 .|| .|. | 3 0.767 -0.001 325.30 0.000 .| | |. | 4 0.680 -0.073 394.71 0.000 .| | .|. | 5 0.594 -0.026 448.15 0.000 .| | .|. | 6 0.513 -0.024 488.30 0.000 .| | .| | 7 0.452 0.116 519.70 0.000 .| | .|. | 8 0.399 -0.046 544.31 0.000 .| | .| | 9 0.360 0.090 564.53 0.000 .| | .|. | 10 0.334 0.023 582.07 0.000 .| | .|. | 11 0.309 -0.044 597.17 0.000 .| | |. | 12 0.276 -0.099 609.27 0.000 .| | .| | 13 0.252 0.117 619.45 0.000 .| | .|. | 14 0.241 0.043 628.81 0.000 .| | .|. | 15 0.235 0.040 637.78 0.000 .| | .|. | 16 0.227 -0.029 646.21 0.000 .| | .| | 17 0.231 0.131 655.08 0.000 .| | .|. | 18 0.240 -0.041 664.71 0.000 .| | .|. | 19 0.241 -0.027 674.50 0.000 .| | .|. | 20 0.242 0.016 684.44 0.000 Plot ACF dan PACF Perubahan Harga Minyak Date: 080312 Time: 14:15 Sample: 2000M01 2011M12 Included observations: 143 Autocorrelation Partial Correlation AC PAC Q-Stat Prob .| | .| | 1 0.329 0.329 15.824 0.000 .|. | |. | 2 0.048 -0.068 16.162 0.000 .|. | .|. | 3 0.003 0.010 16.163 0.001 .|. | .|. | 4 0.020 0.022 16.225 0.003 .|. | .|. | 5 -0.001 -0.017 16.225 0.006 |. | |. | 6 -0.175 -0.190 20.859 0.002 |. | .|. | 7 -0.150 -0.033 24.273 0.001 |. | |. | 8 -0.144 -0.099 27.460 0.001 |. | .|. | 9 -0.105 -0.041 29.160 0.001 .|. | .| | 10 0.047 0.112 29.499 0.001 .|. | .|. | 11 0.067 0.029 30.214 0.001 |. | |. | 12 -0.101 -0.184 31.838 0.001 |. | .|. | 13 -0.088 -0.018 33.073 0.002 .|. | .|. | 14 -0.038 -0.050 33.308 0.003 .|. | .|. | 15 0.062 0.040 33.929 0.003 |. | |. | 16 -0.152 -0.220 37.703 0.002 |. | .|. | 17 -0.108 0.052 39.610 0.001 .|. | .|. | 18 -0.017 -0.027 39.658 0.002 .|. | .|. | 19 -0.009 -0.028 39.673 0.004 .|. | .|. | 20 0.014 -0.026 39.707 0.005 Lampiran 3 1.3. Model Tentatif ARIMA 1,1,1 Dependent Variable: DLO Method: Least Squares Date: 080312 Time: 14:21 Sample adjusted: 2000M03 2011M12 Included observations: 142 after adjustments Convergence achieved after 7 iterations MA Backcast: 2000M02 Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob. C 0.004964 0.007756 0.640038 0.5232 AR1 0.179775 0.244262 0.735994 0.4630 MA1 0.170647 0.244920 0.696745 0.4871 R-squared 0.111636 Mean dependent var 0.005003 Adjusted R-squared 0.098853 S.D. dependent var 0.068279 S.E. of regression 0.064817 Akaike info criterion -2.613601 Sum squared resid 0.583970 Schwarz criterion -2.551154 Log likelihood 188.5657 Hannan-Quinn criter. -2.588226 F-statistic 8.733662 Durbin-Watson stat 2.000603 ProbF-statistic 0.000267 Inverted AR Roots .18 Inverted MA Roots -.17 ARIMA 1,1,0 Dependent Variable: DLO Method: Least Squares Date: 080312 Time: 14:21 Sample adjusted: 2000M03 2011M12 Included observations: 142 after adjustments Convergence achieved after 3 iterations Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob. C 0.004804 0.008093 0.593523 0.5538 AR1 0.329235 0.079644 4.133810 0.0001 R-squared 0.108782 Mean dependent var 0.005003 Adjusted R-squared 0.102416 S.D. dependent var 0.068279 S.E. of regression 0.064689 Akaike info criterion -2.624479 Sum squared resid 0.585846 Schwarz criterion -2.582847 Log likelihood 188.3380 Hannan-Quinn criter. -2.607562 F-statistic 17.08838 Durbin-Watson stat 1.958953 ProbF-statistic 0.000061 Inverted AR Roots .33 ARIMA 0,1,1 Dependent Variable: DLO Method: Least Squares Date: 080312 Time: 14:22 Sample adjusted: 2000M02 2011M12 Included observations: 143 after adjustments Convergence achieved after 6 iterations MA Backcast: 2000M01 Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob. C 0.005343 0.007195 0.742540 0.4590 MA1 0.335290 0.079379 4.223893 0.0000 R-squared 0.110274 Mean dependent var 0.005349 Adjusted R-squared 0.103964 S.D. dependent var 0.068164 S.E. of regression 0.064523 Akaike info criterion -2.629694 Sum squared resid 0.587019 Schwarz criterion -2.588256 Log likelihood 190.0231 Hannan-Quinn criter. -2.612856 F-statistic 17.47577 Durbin-Watson stat 1.962709 ProbF-statistic 0.000051 Inverted MA Roots -.34 Dependent Variable: DLO Method: Least Squares Date: 080312 Time: 14:22 Sample adjusted: 2000M02 2011M12 Included observations: 143 after adjustments Convergence achieved after 6 iterations MA Backcast: 2000M01 Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob. C 0.005343 0.007195 0.742540 0.4590 MA1 0.335290 0.079379 4.223893 0.0000 R-squared 0.110274 Mean dependent var 0.005349 Adjusted R-squared 0.103964 S.D. dependent var 0.068164 S.E. of regression 0.064523 Akaike info criterion -2.629694 Sum squared resid 0.587019 Schwarz criterion -2.588256 Log likelihood 190.0231 Hannan-Quinn criter. -2.612856 F-statistic 17.47577 Durbin-Watson stat 1.962709 ProbF-statistic 0.000051 Inverted MA Roots -.34

2. Analisis Model ARCHGARCH

2.1. Plot ACF dan PACF Residual Kuadrat ARIMA 0,1,1

Dokumen yang terkait

Analisis Pengaruh Harga Minyak Dunia, Nilai Tukar, Inflasi, dan Suku Bunga SBI Terhadap Pergerakan Indeks Harga Saham Gabungan di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2009-2014

3 67 113

Analisis Pengaruh Rasio Penilaian Pasar Terhadap Harga Saham Pada Perusahaan Asuransi yang Tercatat di Bursa Efek Indonesia.

3 47 82

Analisis Pengaruh Harga Minyak Dunia, Nilai Tukar, Inflasi dan Suku Bunga SBI terhadap Pergerakan Indeks Harga Saham Gabungan (IHSG) di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) Periode 2006-2009

2 39 90

Analisis pengaruh inflasi, nilai tukar, suku bunga, harga minyak dan harga emas terhadap return saham (studi pada pasar modal Indonesia)

0 9 142

ANALISIS PENGARUH RASIO PASAR, PROFITABILITAS DAN AKTIVITAS TERHADAP HARGA SAHAM PERUSAHAAN Analisis Pengaruh Rasio Pasar, Profitabilitas Dan Aktivitas Terhadap Harga Saham Perusahaan Food And Beverages (Studi pada Perusahaan Food and Beverages yang Ter

0 3 14

ANALISIS PENGARUH RASIO NILAI AKTIVITAS DAN NILAI PASAR TERHADAP PERUBAHAN Analisis Pengaruh Rasio Nilai Aktivitas Dan Nilai Pasar Terhadap Perubahan Harga Saham.

0 0 13

PENDAHULUAN Analisis Pengaruh Rasio Nilai Aktivitas Dan Nilai Pasar Terhadap Perubahan Harga Saham.

0 0 7

Pengaruh Likuiditas, Solvabilitas, Aktivitas, Profitabilitas dan Penilaian Pasar Terhadap Harga Saham Perusahaan LQ45 di Bursa Efek Indonesia.

0 0 11

Analisis Pengaruh Volatilitas Harga Komoditas terhadap Aktivitas Pasar Saham di Indonesia IMG 20150929 0001

0 0 1

ANALISIS PENGARUH MAKROEKONOMI TERHADAP HARGA SAHAM DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA (Studi pada Perusahaan Go Public yang Terdaftar di BEI Tahun 2006-2010)

0 0 80