Monthly Progress Report September 2013
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 39
6.6.4 LARAP Study Report for Package No. 07 : Indrapura – Tapan under preparation by
Balai II
6.6.5 LARAP Study Report for Package No. 08 : Bts Kota Pariaman – Manggopoh
The CTC was revised the LARAP report and submit to PMU on 9 September 2013, PMU requested to Balai IIthe LARAP consultant to review the report based on CTC
comments.
6.6.6 LARAP Study Report for Package No. 09 : Rantau Tijang – Kota Agung
6.6.7 LARAP Study Report for Package No. 10 : Sp. Empat – Air Balam
The CTC was revised the LARAP report and submit to PMU on 9 September 2013, PMU requested to Balai IIthe LARAP consultant to review the report based on CTC
comments
6.6.8 LARAP Study Report for Package No. 12 : Kambang – Indrapura
The CTC was revised the LARAP report and submit to PMU on 9 September 2013, PMU requested to Balai IIthe LARAP consultant to review the report based on CTC
comments.
6.6.9 LARAP Study Report for Package No. 15 : SP. Gunung Kemala – Pg. Tampak
The CTC was revised LARAP Report and submitted to PMU on 30 August 2013 and to the Bank on 10 September 2013 then the Bank approval on 16 September 2013.
The bidding process can start for this package.
The AMDAL has submit to the Bank on 30 September 2013 and approved
6.6.10 LARAP Study Report for Package No. 20 : Lubuk Alung – Sicincin
The UKLUPL has submit to the Bank on 30 September 2013
6.6.11 LARAP Study Report for Package No. 20: Lubuk Alung – Kuraitaji
The UKLUPL has submit to the Bank on 30 September 2013
6.7 Management Information Systems
The Information Management Specialist has been mobilized. The activity for management information system will be reported on appendix G.
Monthly Progress Report September 2013
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 40
6.8 Quality Assurance
Quality Assurance Engineer has been mobilized now. But the quality assurance activities for the project cannot be reported due to the end of September 2013, there
has been no work activity at the beginning.
6.9 Project Risks and Mitigation Measures 6.9.1
Risks Related to Delays
Since the detailed engineering design DED is under responsibility of the Design and Supervision Consultant DSC, delay on DSC establishment affected to the
procurement of AWP-2 and AWP-3 sub-projects. As discussed previously above, the DED of several subprojects of WP-2 and WP-3 were prepared and completed by
respective P2JN. The CTC has then been instructed by DGH to review the DEDs of seven packages completed by the P2JNs package 5, 6, 11, 13, 15, 17 and 19.
6.9.2 Financial Risks
The following factors will be monitored during implementation of the loan project. •
Loan Amount •
Actual Tender Prices •
Price Adjustment •
Currency Fluctuation •
Current Estimated Situation No risk was detected until preparation of this report since the main program of the
loan civil works implementation has not yet been started with contract sign.
6.9.3 Risks Related to Quality
The quality of work is inherently tied to the competence of the Contractors and the diligence of the Supervision Teams. The competence or otherwise of contractors
shall be considered at the time of bid evaluation and prior to the award of any contract.
The quality of supervision however is influenced by the following factors: •
Ensuring that supervision staff levels are fully manned with competent, honest, qualified and experienced personnel.
• The provision of properly equipped laboratories with properly trained
operators for each package. Package supervision comes under the responsibilities of the immediate supervision
teams and the relevant DSC but the Quality Assurance Engineer from CTC, when mobilized, will periodically monitor their performance.
Until now, the performances have not been reported by the Quality Assurance Engineer from CTC, because the works activity has not started
.