Monthly Progress Report September 2013
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 14
100 billion based on Perpres 70, th. 2013, DGH has also completed the draft of consolidated multiple contract ICB Standard Bidding
Document for four 4 packages under AWP-1. The draft had been submitted to the Bank on 8 March 2012. The Bank’s comments had been issued on 12 March 2012. The draft of
consolidated SBD was revised by DGH accommodating the Bank’s comments and submitted to the Banks on 27 June 2012. Second revision of the draft consolidated SBD,
as requested by the Bank regarding synchronization between drawings and Bill of Quantities by letter dated 1 August 2012, was then concurred by the Bank on 31 October
2012.
CTC had also involved in Selection of DSC WINRIP since March 2013, started by attend the opening of Financial Proposal on March 5, 2013. Procurement committee for
Selection of DSC had sent Technical Evaluation Report TER to the Bank on December 20, 2013 and had received the approval from the Bank on February 21, 2013. The Final
Evaluation Report including Technical and Financial Evaluation and completed with Notice of Negotiation and Draft Contract then was sent to Bank by the committee on April
3
rd
, 2013. NOL from the Bank was received on April 19, 2013 to Renardet, SA Switzerland cs as the first rank of technical and financial evaluation result. Finally the
contract for this assignment was sign on June 11, 2013.
The WINRIP Procurement Plan is shown in Appendix F. 4.3 Civil Works Implementation
Until the end of September 2013, there was no subproject contracted.
4.4 Civil Works Progress
No civil works progress can be reported since there was no subproject contracted until the end of September 2013.
4.5 Quality Assurance
The DSC will be responsible for quality assurance of materials and workmanship, certifying whether or not contractors have achieved the required results, as well as
documentation and reporting based on the financial management plan. They will prepare a Quality Assurance system covering all subprojects, and continuously monitor the
effectiveness of their supervision procedures.
On July 01, 2013 Quality Assurance Engineer of the CTC already mobilization. Quality Assurance Engineer has been submitted “guidelines for use of Quality Assurance
Plan to DSC Padang on September 10, 2013 In according with activity of Quality Assurance Engineer in September 2013, there are
some comment for Quality Assurance Engineer, during site visit to Banadar Lampung, Lampung Province package Krui - Biha, about as:
Explain the Quality Assurance Report who responsibility to made, preparing, checking and approval with PPK Krui – Biha and explains the mean and purpose of
visit. CTC explain, the most important Quality Assurance Report must comply with
Monthly Progress Report September 2013
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 15
Standard Operation Procedure SOP both for administration and technical works. Comment CTC after visit:
o There are urgent need for drainage construction including culvert
o Retaining walls should be constructed at landslide – prone area
o Routine Maintenance should be carried out
4.6 Environmental and Social Considerations 4.6.1 Current Overall Situation
A project category is assigned to each package as either Category A, B or C depending on the likely degree of influence on environmental issues with a brief
explanation as follows Appendix E.
Category A project is one which will have a significant negative impact on the environment and may have an influence on areas outside the actual project area. A
project classified as such requires an AMDAL ANDAL, RKLRPL study.
Category B project is one which affects the people or the environment to some extent but with a smaller impact than a Category A. The required environmental analysis is a
UKLUPL study only.
Category C project has minimal effect on the people or environment and an environmental analysis is not required. Standard operational procedures SOP or
SKPPL are used to handle any minor problem which may arise.
Details of packages that require environmental safeguards are given in Appendix E.
The following table provides a summary of the work involved are 21 packages.
Works Programme
No of Packages
No of Investigations Approval by
Remarks BLH
World Bank
AWP-1 4
8 SPPL x 4
Full LARAP x 4 4
SPPL 4
Full LARAP Approved – NOL issued
by WB, except for SPPL
AWP-2 8
17 Simple LARAP x 1
Full LARAP x 8 AMDAL Study x 4
UKLUPL x 4 4 UKLUPL
2 AMDAL
1 SLARAP
1 one Study AMDAL for threes packages, are
Packages No.7, 12 and 14 packages on AWP2
AWP3.
1 one Study AMDAL for two packages, are
Packages No.11 16. packages on AWP2
AWP3.
AWP-3 9
14 Full LARAP x 8
AMDAL Study x 1 UKLUPL x 5
5 UKLUPL 1
Full LARAP Approved – NOL issued
by WB, except for AMDAL and UKLUPL
Total 21
39 15
6
Out of 21 packages, have required environmental impact investigation. All 39 studies 18 environmental studies are requiring approval of the Environmental Agency BLH and 21
