Kepuasan Kerja Pengaruh persepsi karyawan pada lingkungan kerja terhadap kepuasan kerja karyawan studi kasus pada karyawan PT Madu Baru Yogyakarta Divisi Sumber Daya Manusia dan Umum

98 99 Lampiran 3. Uji Validitas dan Reabilitas, Uji Asumsi Klasik, dan Uji Regresi Berganda

1. Uji Validitas dan Reabilitas

Uji Validitas dan Reabilitas Persepsi Karyawan pada lingkungan Kerja Fisik Correlations item1 item2 item3 item4 item5 item6 item7 item8 total item1 Pearson Correlation 1.000 .747 .477 .442 .366 .235 .325 .324 .677 Sig. 2- tailed .000 .006 .011 .039 .195 .069 .070 .000 N 32.000 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 item2 Pearson Correlation .747 1.000 .595 .581 .576 .452 .496 .430 .823 Sig. 2- tailed .000 .000 .000 .001 .009 .004 .014 .000 N 32 32.000 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 item3 Pearson Correlation .477 .595 1.000 .456 .306 .290 .399 .464 .663 Sig. 2- tailed .006 .000 .009 .088 .107 .024 .007 .000 N 32 32 32.000 32 32 32 32 32 32 item4 Pearson Correlation .442 .581 .456 1.000 .560 .506 .349 .530 .741 Sig. 2- tailed .011 .000 .009 .001 .003 .050 .002 .000 N 32 32 32 32.000 32 32 32 32 32 item5 Pearson Correlation .366 .576 .306 .560 1.000 .865 .675 .530 .823 Sig. 2- tailed .039 .001 .088 .001 .000 .000 .002 .000 N 32 32 32 32 32.000 32 32 32 32 100 item6 Pearson Correlation .235 .452 .290 .506 .865 1.000 .664 .374 .738 Sig. 2- tailed .195 .009 .107 .003 .000 .000 .035 .000 N 32 32 32 32 32 32.000 32 32 32 item7 Pearson Correlation .325 .496 .399 .349 .675 .664 1.000 .667 .762 Sig. 2- tailed .069 .004 .024 .050 .000 .000 .000 .000 N 32 32 32 32 32 32 32.000 32 32 item8 Pearson Correlation .324 .430 .464 .530 .530 .374 .667 1.000 .718 Sig. 2- tailed .070 .014 .007 .002 .002 .035 .000 .000 N 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32.000 32 total Pearson Correlation .677 .823 .663 .741 .823 .738 .762 .718 1.000 Sig. 2- tailed .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 N 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32.000 . Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level 2-tailed. . Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level 2-tailed. 101 Reliability Case Processing Summary N Cases Valid 32 100.0 Excluded a .0 Total 32 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. Reliability Statistics Cronbachs Alpha N of Items .880 8 Item-Total Statistics Scale Mean if Item Deleted Scale Variance if Item Deleted Corrected Item- Total Correlation Cronbachs Alpha if Item Deleted item1 27.4688 19.483 .538 .881 item2 27.5000 19.677 .763 .855 item3 27.2812 20.854 .560 .874 item4 27.6562 20.168 .655 .865 item5 27.5938 18.894 .750 .854 item6 27.5000 19.677 .639 .866 item7 27.3125 20.157 .685 .862 item8 27.5312 20.193 .622 .868 102 Uji validitas dan Reabilitas Persepsi Karyawan pada Lingkungan Kerja Non Fisik Correlations item1 item2 item3 item4 item5 total item1 Pearson Correlation 1.000 .276 .297 .166 .295 .668 Sig. 2-tailed .126 .099 .365 .101 .000 N 32.000 32 32 32 32 32 item2 Pearson Correlation .276 1.000 .391 .679 .267 .714 Sig. 2-tailed .126 .027 .000 .139 .000 N 32 32.000 32 32 32 32 item3 Pearson Correlation .297 .391 1.000 .405 .478 .739 Sig. 2-tailed .099 .027 .021 .006 .000 N 32 32 32.000 32 32 32 item4 Pearson Correlation .166 .679 .405 1.000 .374 .682 Sig. 2-tailed .365 .000 .021 .035 .000 N 32 32 32 32.000 32 32 item5 Pearson Correlation .295 .267 .478 .374 1.000 .672 Sig. 2-tailed .101 .139 .006 .035 .000 N 32 32 32 32 32.000 32 total Pearson Correlation .668 .714 .739 .682 .672 1.000 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 N 32 32 32 32 32 32.000 . Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level 2-tailed. . Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level 2-tailed. 103 Reliability Case Processing Summary N Cases Valid 32 100.0 Excluded a .0 Total 32 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. Reliability Statistics Cronbachs Alpha N of Items .709 5 Item-Total Statistics Scale Mean if Item Deleted Scale Variance if Item Deleted Corrected Item- Total Correlation Cronbachs Alpha if Item Deleted item1 14.6562 4.297 .350 .741 item2 14.4375 4.641 .531 .637 item3 14.6875 4.351 .539 .630 item4 14.5312 5.160 .543 .650 item5 14.4375 4.899 .488 .656 104 Uji Validitas dan Reabilitas Kepuasan Kerja Karyawan Correlations skor1 skor2 skor3 skor4 skor5 skor6 skor7 skor8 skor9 skor10 skor11 skor12 skortota l skor1 Pearson Correlation 1.000 .411 .391 .552 .540 .143 .089 .330 .227 .955 .527 .391 .672 Sig. 2-tailed .020 .027 .001 .001 .435 .628 .065 .211 .000 .002 .027 .000 N 32.000 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 skor2 Pearson Correlation .411 1.000 .181 .396 .534 .549 .240 .063 .503 .417 .854 .109 .698 Sig. 2-tailed .020 .321 .025 .002 .001 .186 .734 .003 .018 .000 .553 .000 N 32 32.000 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 skor3 Pearson Correlation .391 .181 1.000 .531 .390 .274 .084 .285 .097 .385 .194 .916 .570 Sig. 2-tailed .027 .321 .002 .027 .130 .646 .114 .596 .030 .288 .000 .001 N 32 32 32.000 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 skor4 Pearson Correlation .552 .396 .531 1.000 .635 .368 .139 .306 .287 .532 .462 .444 .701 Sig. 2-tailed .001 .025 .002 .000 .038 .447 .089 .111 .002 .008 .011 .000 N 32 32 32 32.000 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 skor5 Pearson Correlation .540 .534 .390 .635 1.000 .613 .101 .224 .581 .530 .604 .390 .793 Sig. 2-tailed .001 .002 .027 .000 .000 .583 .217 .000 .002 .000 .027 .000 N 32 32 32 32 32.000 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 skor6 Pearson Correlation .143 .549 .274 .368 .613 1.000 .471 .496 .692 .166 .557 .208 .749 Sig. 2-tailed .435 .001 .130 .038 .000 .007 .004 .000 .363 .001 .253 .000 N 32 32 32 32 32 32.000 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 105 skor7 Pearson Correlation .089 .240 .084 .139 .101 .471 1.000 .454 .305 .103 .281 .084 .468 Sig. 2-tailed .628 .186 .646 .447 .583 .007 .009 .089 .573 .120 .646 .007 N 32 32 32 32 32 32 32.000 32 32 32 32 32 32 skor8 Pearson Correlation .330 .063 .285 .306 .224 .496 .454 1.000 .355 .323 .070 .285 .524 Sig. 2-tailed .065 .734 .114 .089 .217 .004 .009 .046 .072 .704 .114 .002 N 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32.000 32 32 32 32 32 skor9 Pearson Correlation .227 .503 .097 .287 .581 .692 .305 .355 1.000 .237 .486 .032 .654 Sig. 2-tailed .211 .003 .596 .111 .000 .000 .089 .046 .191 .005 .860 .000 N 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32.000 32 32 32 32 skor10 Pearson Correlation .955 .417 .385 .532 .530 .166 .103 .323 .237 1.000 .522 .385 .674 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .018 .030 .002 .002 .363 .573 .072 .191 .002 .030 .000 N 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32.000 32 32 32 skor11 Pearson Correlation .527 .854 .194 .462 .604 .557 .281 .070 .486 .522 1.000 .122 .749 Sig. 2-tailed .002 .000 .288 .008 .000 .001 .120 .704 .005 .002 .507 .000 N 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32.000 32 32 skor12 Pearson Correlation .391 .109 .916 .444 .390 .208 .084 .285 .032 .385 .122 1.000 .521 Sig. 2-tailed .027 .553 .000 .011 .027 .253 .646 .114 .860 .030 .507 .002 N 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32.000 32 skortotal Pearson Correlation .672 .698 .570 .701 .793 .749 .468 .524 .654 .674 .749 .521 1.000 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .000 .001 .000 .000 .000 .007 .002 .000 .000 .000 .002 N 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32.000 . Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level 2-tailed. 106 Reliability Harapan Case Processing Summary N Cases Valid 32 100.0 Excluded a .0 Total 32 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. Reliability Statistics Cronbachs Alpha N of Items .870 12 107 Item-Total Statistics Scale Mean if Item Deleted Scale Variance if Item Deleted Corrected Item- Total Correlation Cronbachs Alpha if Item Deleted skor1 42.6250 24.887 .607 .858 skor2 43.0312 23.838 .618 .856 skor3 42.8438 25.297 .484 .864 skor4 42.7500 24.581 .637 .856 skor5 42.8750 22.694 .729 .848 skor6 43.1875 22.931 .671 .852 skor7 43.0625 25.028 .323 .880 skor8 42.8125 25.964 .445 .866 skor9 43.0312 23.709 .555 .861 skor10 42.5938 24.765 .607 .858 skor11 42.9375 23.415 .679 .852 skor12 42.8438 25.620 .429 .867 108 Kinerja Correlations skor1 skor2 skor3 skor4 skor5 skor6 skor7 skor8 skor9 skor10 skor11 skor12 skortotal skor1 Pearson Correlation 1.000 .692 .458 .478 .409 .316 .701 .562 .654 .959 .646 .528 .844 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .008 .006 .020 .078 .000 .001 .000 .000 .000 .002 .000 N 32.000 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 skor2 Pearson Correlation .692 1.000 .354 .394 .310 .357 .568 .674 .389 .719 .540 .675 .781 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .047 .026 .084 .045 .001 .000 .028 .000 .001 .000 .000 N 32 32.000 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 skor3 Pearson Correlation .458 .354 1.000 .889 .653 .150 .414 .284 .164 .490 .384 .261 .666 Sig. 2-tailed .008 .047 .000 .000 .411 .018 .115 .370 .004 .030 .148 .000 N 32 32 32.000 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 skor4 Pearson Correlation .478 .394 .889 1.000 .620 .298 .480 .283 .193 .518 .443 .253 .708 Sig. 2-tailed .006 .026 .000 .000 .098 .005 .117 .291 .002 .011 .163 .000 N 32 32 32 32.000 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 skor5 Pearson Correlation .409 .310 .653 .620 1.000 .556 .242 .133 .297 .442 .201 .100 .620 Sig. 2-tailed .020 .084 .000 .000 .001 .182 .467 .099 .011 .270 .586 .000 109 N 32 32 32 32 32.000 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 skor6 Pearson Correlation .316 .357 .150 .298 .556 1.000 .385 .257 .196 .364 .341 .225 .559 Sig. 2-tailed .078 .045 .411 .098 .001 .030 .155 .283 .041 .056 .217 .001 N 32 32 32 32 32 32.000 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 skor7 Pearson Correlation .701 .568 .414 .480 .242 .385 1.000 .593 .394 .681 .957 .556 .795 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .001 .018 .005 .182 .030 .000 .026 .000 .000 .001 .000 N 32 32 32 32 32 32 32.000 32 32 32 32 32 32 skor8 Pearson Correlation .562 .674 .284 .283 .133 .257 .593 1.000 .162 .589 .503 .976 .705 Sig. 2-tailed .001 .000 .115 .117 .467 .155 .000 .375 .000 .003 .000 .000 N 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32.000 32 32 32 32 32 skor9 Pearson Correlation .654 .389 .164 .193 .297 .196 .394 .162 1.000 .617 .427 .181 .513 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .028 .370 .291 .099 .283 .026 .375 .000 .015 .321 .003 N 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32.000 32 32 32 32 skor10 Pearson Correlation .959 .719 .490 .518 .442 .364 .681 .589 .617 1.000 .632 .562 .870 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .000 .004 .002 .011 .041 .000 .000 .000 .000 .001 .000 N 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32.000 32 32 32 110 skor11 Pearson Correlation .646 .540 .384 .443 .201 .341 .957 .503 .427 .632 1.000 .528 .747 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .001 .030 .011 .270 .056 .000 .003 .015 .000 .002 .000 N 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32.000 32 32 skor12 Pearson Correlation .528 .675 .261 .253 .100 .225 .556 .976 .181 .562 .528 1.000 .682 Sig. 2-tailed .002 .000 .148 .163 .586 .217 .001 .000 .321 .001 .002 .000 N 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32.000 32 skortotal Pearson Correlation .844 .781 .666 .708 .620 .559 .795 .705 .513 .870 .747 .682 1.000 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .001 .000 .000 .003 .000 .000 .000 N 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32.000 . Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level 2-tailed. . Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level 2-tailed. 111 Reliability Kinerja Case Processing Summary N Cases Valid 32 100.0 Excluded a .0 Total 32 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. Reliability Statistics Cronbachs Alpha N of Items .899 12 112 Item-Total Statistics Scale Mean if Item Deleted Scale Variance if Item Deleted Corrected Item- Total Correlation Cronbachs Alpha if Item Deleted skor1 42.4375 31.867 .812 .884 skor2 42.5938 30.701 .722 .885 skor3 42.6250 31.468 .578 .894 skor4 42.5312 31.354 .634 .890 skor5 42.6562 32.104 .527 .896 skor6 43.2812 31.822 .432 .906 skor7 42.3438 32.104 .754 .886 skor8 42.6875 31.448 .630 .891 skor9 42.5625 34.319 .437 .899 skor10 42.4688 31.418 .842 .882 skor11 42.3125 32.738 .701 .889 skor12 42.6562 32.039 .610 .892 113

2. Uji Asumsi Klasik

A. Uji Multikolinearitas

Regression Variables EnteredRemoved b Model Variables Entered Variables Removed Method 1 LingkunganKerja NonFisik, LingkunganKerja Fisik a . Enter a. All requested variables entered. b. Dependent Variable: KepuasanKerja Coefficients a Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t Sig. Collinearity Statistics B Std. Error Beta Tolerance VIF 1 Constant 33.339 19.134 1.742 .092 LingkunganKerjaFisik 1.081 .386 .457 2.801 .009 .958 1.044 LingkunganKerjaNonFi sik 1.382 .668 .338 2.070 .047 .958 1.044 a. Dependent Variable: KepuasanKerja 114

B. Uji Heterokedastisitas

Regression Variables EnteredRemoved b Model Variables Entered Variables Removed Method 1 LingkunganKerjaNonFi sik, LingkunganKerjaFisik a . Enter a. All requested variables entered. b. Dependent Variable: KepuasanKerja Coefficients a Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t Sig. B Std. Error Beta 1 Constant 33.339 19.134 1.742 .092 LingkunganKerjaFisik 1.081 .386 .457 2.801 .009 LingkunganKerjaNonFis ik 1.382 .668 .338 2.070 .047 a. Dependent Variable: KepuasanKerja 115

C. Uji Autokorelasi

Regression Variables EnteredRemoved b Model Variables Entered Variables Removed Method 1 LingkunganKerja NonFisik, LingkunganKerja Fisik a . Enter a. All requested variables entered. b. Dependent Variable: KepuasanKerja Model Summary b Mo del R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate Durbin-Watson 1 .510 a .260 .209 9.79657 1.620 a. Predictors: Constant, LingkunganKerjaNonFisik, LingkunganKerjaFisik b.DependentVariable:Kepua sankerja ANOVA b Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression .423 2 .211 3.339 .006 a Residual 2.057 29 .071 Total 2.480 31 a. Predictors: Constant, LingkunganKerjaNonFisik, LingkunganKerjaFisik b. Dependent Variable: KepuasanKerja 116 Coefficients a Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t Sig. B Std. Error Beta 1 Constant 33.339 19.134 1.742 .092 LingkunganKerjaFisi k 1.081 .386 .457 2.801 .009 LingkunganKerjaNo nFisik 1.382 .668 .338 2.070 .047 a. Dependent Variable: KepuasanKerja

D. Uji Normalitas

One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test KepuasanKerja LingkunganKerja Fisik LingkunganKerja NonFisik N 32 32 32 Normal Parameters a Mean 93.2500 32.2812 18.0938 Std. Deviation 11.01319 4.65753 2.69240 Most Extreme Differences Absolute .130 .132 .198 Positive .112 .097 .156 Negative -.130 -.132 -.198 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .734 .748 1.120 Asymp. Sig. 2-tailed .653 .631 .162 a. Test distribution is Normal. b. Calculated from data. 117

3. Uji Regresi Linier Berganda

Variables EnteredRemoved b Model Variables Entered Variables Removed Method 1 LingkunganKerja NonFisik, LingkunganKerja Fisik a . Enter a. All requested variables entered. b. Dependent Variable: KepuasanKerja Model Summary b Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1 .510 a .260 .209 9.79657 a. Predictors: Constant, LingkunganKerjaNonFisik, LingkunganKerjaFisik b. Dependent Variable: KepuasanKerja 118 ANOVA b Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression .423 2 .211 3.339 .006 a Residual 2.057 29 .071 Total 2.480 31 a. Predictors: Constant, LingkunganKerjaNonFisik, LingkunganKerjaFisik b. Dependent Variable: KepuasanKerja Coefficients a Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t Sig. B Std. Error Beta 1 Constant 33.339 19.134 1.742 .092 LingkunganKerjaF isik 1.081 .386 .457 2.801 .009 LingkunganKerja NonFisik 1.382 .668 .338 2.070 .047 a. Dependent Variable: KepuasanKerja

Dokumen yang terkait

PENGARUH PENILAIAN KINERJA DAN MOTIVASI KERJA KARYAWAN TERHADAP PRODUKTIVITAS KERJA KARYAWAN PADA DIVISI MANAJEMEN SUMBER DAYA MANUSIA DI PT. INTI (PERSERO) BANDUNG.

0 1 73

Pengaruh stres kerja terhadap kepuasan kerja karyawan pt. Pos indonesia (persero) di bandung: studi pada karyawan divisi pelayanan sumber daya manusia.

4 25 64

PENGARUH MOTIVASI TERHADAP PRODUKTIVITAS KERJA KARYAWAN PT. INTI (PERSERO) BANDUNG : Studi pada Karyawan Divisi Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia.

1 5 66

PENGARUH KOMPETENSI DAN KEPUASAN KERJA TERHADAP KINERJA KARYAWAN: Studi Persepsional Karyawan Bagian Sumber Daya Manusia PT ULTRAJAYA TBK.

0 1 47

PENGARUH KONDISI KERJA TERHADAP KEPUASAN KERJA KARYAWAN PADA DIVISI SUMBER DAYA MANUSIA PT KAI (PERSERO) BANDUNG.

0 2 43

PENGARUH GAYA KEPEMIMPINAN TERHADAP KEPUASAN KERJA KARYAWAN : Survei Persepsional pada Karyawan Divisi Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia PT. INTI (Persero) Bandung.

0 0 72

Pengaruh persepsi karyawan pada lingkungan kerja terhadap kepuasan kerja karyawan : studi kasus pada karyawan PT Madu Baru Yogyakarta Divisi Sumber Daya Manusia dan Umum.

0 0 143

112847 ID pengaruh kepuasan kerja terhadap prestas

0 0 12

Lingkungan kerja psikis dan efektivitas komunikasi menurut persepsi karyawan : studi kasus pada PT. Madu Baru Yogyakarta - USD Repository

0 1 148

Pengaruh persepsi karyawan pada gaya kepemimpinan manajer terhadap kepuasan kerja karyawan : Studi kasus pada karyawan tetap bagian SDM dan umum PT. Madubaru Yogyakarta - USD Repository

0 0 97