176
B to..whatever. And it is once again back to teacher’s duty to combine the ideas into one single conclusion.
2. B
Scoring and class discussion. Scoring because we can measure our ability. Why discussion? Because we
will know about our mistake and we will know the true answer. And..the explanation of course from the lecturer because we will know the exact
answer, not gossip gossip, answer gossip.
3. C
Class discussion. Usually in the end of the meeting, lecturer ask again about what heshe said, so here the students are tertantang for remind. Teacher as
controller. So if the discussion go far away from the topic, teacher roles to make it in the normal way.
4. D
Presentation, jadi presenter aku suka. Ngumpulin tugas aku juga suka. Scooring aku suka, maksudnya performance kan itu.
5. E
Scoring and class discussion. Why class discussion because we can discuss the material in this class so
we can gain information which is we do not get before. Scoring… We can know the…our competence. Kalo milih, discussion dulu.
6. F
Presentation and then discussion together. Jadi, question and answer gitu. Because usually the presenter present the material and if there is something
we don’t know we can ask question or maybe the teacher can add something important.
7. G
I prefer discussion as class participation. But in discussion I prefer group discussion not all class. All class sometimes especially the teacher choose
the students “You answer this” – “Oh, I can’t answer it but I can answer that.” So, sometimes that will down the moral mental. Red of the students.
So I prefer discussion after do the worksheet.
8. H
Submission and approval. Aku suka yang dikumpul, dibagi, jadi kita tau salahnya dimana.
13. Do you think that Ws can help youstudents to enhance their independence in
learning? No. Student
Answers 1.
A Not 100 yes, but I will say YES.
The system. The mindset is that Ws is given to fulfill the requirements like.. ok, I have
to submit, ok I have to write, ok I have to do because I think the right mindset, the right paradigm is..ok Ws is given to assess myself, so see as
weather I could compete this material or not. The aim is good, but the application I think it is not in accordance with the
aim. The first is that Ws should…MUST…underline all the quality not the
quantity. Not because that I hate to do in length but because the aim is to dig out the understanding of the students. It is bout the quality, not the
quantity.
2. B Yes
Of course.
But it depends on student’s motivation, student’s laziness. If they want to be.. if they want to have a progress they have to do the Ws
by themselves, or if they cannot do the questions they can discuss it with their friends, but if they do not want to have any progress yaa…they can
cheat.
3. C Yoo…bisa..
Based on the person. Kalo misalnya.. if they do just by copy and paste, ya
177
itu meaningless. But if they do it by at least group discussion, it’s related to independent learning.
4. D
Ya.. Sangat membantu. Karena, itu tadi aku selalu menerapkan aku ngerjain Ws sama temen2, aku ngerjain sendiri dulu dan itu membuat kita jadi
independent learning itu tadi. Kita mengukur kemampuan kita dulu baru kita bekerja sama temen.
5. E
Yes of course. Because worksheet itself distribute to…kan worksheet dikasih buat belajar di rumah kayak homework gitu, jadi kita jawabnya itu
di luar kelas.. Bingung. Pokoknya kita belajar sendiri lewat worksheet itu. 6.
F Theoretically yes, but the fact is sometimes we do not do worksheet well.
7. G
Yes, if the worksheet is individual. 8. H
Bisa.. Tapi jangan muluk-muluk, jangan kebanyakan. Jadi bosan
178
Appendix 10 Lecturers’ Experience in Using Worksheet
No. Name
Period of teaching in PBI
Sanata Dharma University …- now
Class Supported Experiencing
Worksheet in Teaching
Literature Linguistic Language Teaching
Language Skills
Yes No
1.
C. Tutyandari, S.Pd., M.Pd.
1996 √
√ √
2.
Made Frida Yulia, S.Pd., M.Pd.
1996 √
√ √
√ 3.
V. Triprihatmini, S.Pd., M.Hum., M.A.
1996 √
4.
Dr. Retno Muljani, M.Pd.
1982 √
√ √
√ 5.
Henny Herawati, S.Pd., M.Hum.
1995 √
√ √
√ 6.
Christina Kristiyani, S.Pd., M.Pd.
2000 √
√ √
7.
Carla Sih Prabandari, S.Pd., M.Hum.
1999 √
√ √
√ 8.
G. Punto Aji, S.Pd., M.Hum.
1999 √
√ √
9.
Drs. J.B. Gunawan, M.A.
1981 √
√ √
√ 10.
Drs. A. Herujiyanto, M.A., Ph.D.
1987 √
√ √
√ 11.
Rm. L. Suharjanto, S.J., S.S., B.S.T., M.A.
2006 √
√ √
12.
Ag. Hardi Prasetyo, S.Pd., M.A.
1999 √
√ √
√ 13.
Ch. Lhaksmita Anandari, S.Pd., M.Ed.
2002 √
√ √
√ 14.
Fidelis Chosa Kastuhandani, S.Pd.
2005 √
√ √
15.
Drs. Prayitno Adinugroho
2001 √
16.
P. Kuswandono, S.Pd., M.Ed.
- √
179
Appendix 11 The Transcript of the Interview to the Lecturers
Interview Transcript
Code : X
A. Independent Learning
