The Description of the Material Evaluation.
72 were easy to be understood by students. It was agreed by half of the evaluators
and the other half of the evaluators were strongly agreed about it. The language that was used in the supplementary material was simple and
easy to be used by the students especially for the seventh gr ader’s students. The
pictures and graphics that the writer used in the supplementary book were interesting. The contents that the writer used in the supplementary book were
attractive enough to get the students ’ attention in learning English. The contents of
the designed material were well elaborated. Generally, all of the contents in the supplementary book were elaborated well and appropriated for BOPKRI 1 Junior
High School. In the second part of the questionnaire, the writer asked the evaluators to
give some opinions or suggestions of the supplementary English material using infographic. There were four questions that the evaluators had to answer. The first
question was about the evaluators’ opinion, comments or feedback for the design material. The second question was about the strength of the supplementary
material. The third question is about the weaknesses of the supplementary material. The last question was about the suggestions for the supplementary
material. The suggestions helped the researcher in revising the designed material before it was implemented in the school.
73
1 The Comments, Opinions, and Feedback from the Evaluators
In the first questions, there were some comments, opinion or feedback from the evaluators. The first evaluator said that the designed material was well
organized. The writer gave the bilingual instruction table at the beginning of the book to help the seventh grader students learnt and understood the general
instruction the supplementary book. The graphic materials were very interesting and could encourage the students in learning English learn more through the book.
The second evaluator said that the goal of the material was unclear. If it was focus on the reading, the reading section should attach more exercises
especially in the comprehension test. It seemed difficult for the student to write down another example of phrases other expressions in English. The writer should
give some clues to help the students did their exercise. The writer should be more careful in giving the exercise to make a dialogue because the students needed a lot
of practices before they produced a text. Some of the pictures were attractive enough for junior high school. However, some of them seemed weird because it
was like the kindergarten picture. The third evaluator said that the designed material was pivotal to rise the
students’ interests and motivations towards the English instructional process. In general, the topics in the designed material could incorporate the elements of
learners’ motivations. The motivation are the figures which exemplify the well- known people among the youngsters nowadays such as Justin Bieber, Afgan, and
One-direction. The instructional procedures and methods are also understandably clear. Furthermore, there was a change of the organizational structure of activities;
74 for instance, individual work, pairs, small groups and whole class activities.
Inevitably, the third evaluator said that were also some adaptions and modifications that need to be carried out in order to make this designed material
more efficacious. First, the English-Indonesian translation found on the certain pages can be marshaled in the end of the books section which is the difficult
vocabulary section. This section aimed to drum up the support for learning. Thus, the students were encouraged to have analytic approach using the pictures that
have already been provided on those certain pages. Second, it was also important that the writer provided feedback form or self-evaluation grid where the students
can use a tick √ to monitor and assess their success in achieving the skills on
their own. Besides, the Did You Know? part could be modified by using the similar topic to the former or later topic to engage the students deeply towards the
main theme discussed and most importantly to make the students more alert to any areas of significant cultural difference.
2 The Strengths and the Weakness of the Supplementary Design material.
In the second question, the writer analyzed the strengths and the weaknesses based on the evaluators
’ answers on the questionnaire. The strengths and weaknesses of the supplementary material based on the evaluators’ answers
were presented in table 4.7.
Table 4.7 The Strengths and the Weakness of the Supplementary Designed Material
Strengths Weaknesses
1. The designed material have suitable competencies for grade seven.
2. The topics are also engaging which related to the close environment.
3. The games is designed to give the 1. It has less exercise or practice to make
the students to produce the text. 2. The listening section is read or listen
from the teacher explanation but the students need the real audio.
75
opportunities for the whole class to produce the language in a fun and competitive way.
4. The writer chooses
the easiest instruction.
5. The writer brings to the language focus using colorful visual aids that help the
learners to create the mental image of the target language.
6. The graphic is attractive; it attracts students to give attention toward the lesson.
It can make the student interest eye catching
7. The infographic is interesting and its content is easy to understand
8. Those colorful pictures and graphics seem to be effective to help the students
visualize the experiences of using English in practical daily life.
9. The pictures are good enough looked by students therefore they would be more
interesting to read some information and fill the exercises.
10. The task in the supplementary material book is also helping the students to
understand more and reviewing the material.
11. The
writer also
write about
pronunciation that can help the student to pronounce it
12. The assessment section can measure the students understanding.
13. The writer provides many beneficial information and exercises for the students.
14. There is a lot of new information that the students will get from this material such
as “did you know”. It will be better if you also put the jokes.
15. The songs are the best section, because it can improve their creativity.
16. There are various activities. The production activities in this designed
material also have the students to use the 3. There is still minor grammatical error,
like typo on page 11 Your welcome should be revised with You’re welcome.
4. The division section of the unit should be more consistent and related.
5. The title of each chapter is not categorized using similar types of dictions.
6. The English grammar features have not maximally been made more salient to
notice the basic features of the language focus discussed.
7. Perhaps the type of text and the font size can be changed, thus the words can be read.
76
grammar in their personal context.
17. The supplementary material helps the students
enrich their
vocabulary, understand the lesson better and to improve
the students’ knowledge about English.
3 The Suggestions for the Design Material In the last question for the second part of the post-designed questionnaire,
the evaluators were asked to give some suggestions to the supplementary designed material. There were many suggestions from the evaluators that could help the
writer revised the designed material. First suggestion comes from the first evaluator. He said learning grammar
and vocabulary was not a fun activity in the classroom. In learning grammar, the learning activities should make the students familiar toward the grammatical
structure. The students also should be given some repetition on grammar exercises. This would make the students become familiar with the grammatical
structure. He also added that learning vocabulary was very important for the students. Vocabulary lesson should be repeated on the exercise. The writer could
include the pronunciation exercise on the vocabulary lesson. It made the students familiar toward the language. Games were the great way in learning the
vocabulary. It would create the fun atmosphere in the class. The second evaluator said that the writer should read more resources
related to the content that the writer chose for the supplementary book. For the supplementary designed material, the writer should attach the pictures
’ sources completely. The second evaluator said that it should be better to give some
77 expressions or texts related to the grammar before the students learnt about
grammar so that the students could understand and applied it. The title of each unit was not i
nteresting enough to get the students’ attention. The writer should choose an interesting topic for each unit. For the assessment section, the writer
had put several vocabularies section. It would be better to use several exercises based on the vocabularies that the students learnt before. In the end of the
material, the writer should add one more page that described the students’ feeling
about the material that they have learnt before. The third evaluators said that the grammar on the supplementary book was
not explicitly integrated well in each topic. It would be better if the writer focused on the certain language focus and highlight the similar patterns which would ease
up the students to pick up the grammar using scaffolding. The third evaluator said that if the students can noticed the salient features of the language input, their
grammar awareness would be improved well too. In the area of vocabulary enrichment,
the third evaluator’s opinion, the writer was suggested to eliminate the English-Indonesian translation in each topic
and marshall the difficult vocabulary in a single section in the end of the book. It was good that the writer still provided the phonetic transcription in each of the
topic so that the teacher can assist the students to emulate the correct pronunciation.
78