67
1. Description of Respondents
The respondents for the designed materials evaluation were three people. They consisted of two English instructors of Alpha English course and one
English teacher of SMA Stella Duce I, Yogyakarta. They had a lot of experiences in teaching English. The English instructors also had experiences in teaching
English for specific purpose. Since these designed materials are for homestay hosts, they were considered as competent respondents. The description of the
respondents is presented in Table 4.6.
Group of Respondents
Educational Background
Teaching Experience Sex
D3 S1
S2 S3
1 1 - 5
5-10 10 M
F Instructors 2 1 1 2
Teacher 1
1 1
Table: 4.6. The Description of the Respondents of the Materials Evaluation
2. Description of the Data
In order to obtain evaluation on the designed materials, the writer distributed the questionnaire. The evaluation was used to revised and improve the
designed materials. The results of the materials evaluation questionnaire are presented in Table 4.7.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
68
No Respondents’ opinion N
Central Tendency
Mean
1 The basic competencies are well formulated.
3 4,3
2 The indicators are well formulated.
3 4
3 The indicators can be used to achieve the basic
competencies. 3 4
4 The materials are appropriate to the standard
competency and basic competencies. 3 4,3
5 The materials are interesting and suitable for the
homestay hosts of the tourism village desa wisata. 3 4
6 The tasks can facilitate the learners to understand the
topics. 3 3,6
7 The materials can influence the learners to increase their
speaking skill. 3 4,3
8 The topics are well selected and arranged.
3 4
9 The discussion of each unit has been presented properly.
3 4
10 The instructions are clear.
3 3,6
11 The materials can develop learners’ speaking skill.
3 4
12 The materials based on task-based learning to teach
speaking are well developed. 3 4
13 Generally, the contents are well elaborated.
3 4
14 Generally, the materials are well elaborated.
3 4
Table: 4.7. The Results of the Materials Evaluation Questionnaire
3. Respondents’ Comments and Suggestions on the Designed Materials