69
1. Explore communication games more to maximize the use of them. 2. Improve the lay-out look.
3. The writer should make different font between the instruction and the content.
4. Revise the grammar because there are some grammatical mistakes. 5. Find some English references to gain the style of the conversation
because some conversations are too Indonesian. 6. The designer needs more English fillers to insert in the conversation.
7. Language focus might be necessary to put before the communicative activity because the learners do not get enough exposure yet before
going to ‘active’ fast of producing English. 8. The writer needs to give more drills after language focus as exposure
before communicative activity.
C. Discussion of the Results of the Analysis and Evaluation
Based on the results of the materials evaluation questionnaire, the designed materials were good and acceptable. The table material evaluation questionnaire
indicated that the mean score were in the range between 3.6 up to 4.3. The total mean of the designed materials was 4 on the scale of 5. Thus, the writer concluded
that the designed materials were good and acceptable for the homestay hosts of Desa Wisata Kembang Arum
. However, the designed materials still needed revisions based on the respondents’ evaluation.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
70
The writer did some revisions to improve the designed materials based on the suggestions given by the respondents. There were seven points of revisions.
The description of the revisions as follows. 1. The writer revised some communication games to maximize the use of them.
2. The writer revised the lay-out by coloring the materials. 3. The writer changed the font of the instruction to differentiate between the
instruction and the content. 4. The writer revised some grammatical mistakes in the designed materials.
5. The writer changed or revised the style of some conversations. 6. The writer inserted some English fillers in the conversations.
7. The writer placed the Language Focus section before the Communicative Activities section. The reason of it was because the learners needed to receive
adequate exposures before they use the target language in Communicative Activities section. Besides, the writer also considered that they were in
beginner level. Thus, the writer expected that they were ready to produce the language after receiving adequate exposures. The writer believed that adequate
exposures would contribute to the success of the language use. There was one suggestion that the writer did not accept. The writer did not
accept the suggestion to give drills after Language Focus section because the writer considered that the important task for English speaking materials based on
task-based learning was the task that gives the learners plenty opportunities to use or produce the language. Besides, the activities before the Communicative
Activities had given adequate exposures for the learners.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
71
D. Presentation of the Final Version of the Designed Materials
