Operational Product Revision The Acceptability of the Development Product
174
summative evaluation, and 7 operational product revision with revision. Moreover, the conceptual model was validated through the questionnaires and
interview. The results show that the conceptual need to be revised. To answer the second research, there were three sets of module produced,
namely students ’ course book, teacher’s book, and students’ worksheet, as the
results. Firstly, the students ’ course book consisted of seven units. Those seven
units were 1
You Need a Professional Like Us, 2 Do You Know Your Wedding
Structure?, 3 Venue, Photographer, Caterer. What Else?, 4 That’s a Very Kind
Offer from Us, 5 Which Indonesian Menu Will You Prefer?, 6 Here is Our Wedding Contract,
and
7 Finally, Your Big Day is Coming
. Furthermore, every unit contained five phases reflecting task-based
learning framework. Firstly,
Let’s Begin phase is aimed at recallying students’
prior knowledge about particular topic being learned. Secondly,
Let’s Prepare
phase is a phase to give input to the students. Thirdly,
Let’s Do It phase consists
the big project of the unit to be accomplished in group. Forthly,
Let’s Learn
phase has purpose to learn language focus of the unit. Lastly,
Let’s Reflect phase
will give the students a time to reflect what have been learned. In dealing with project-based learning framework, the processes
implemented in the teaching and learning process derived from Stoller 1997, as quoted in Richards and Renandya 2002 were 1 agree on a theme for the
project, 2 determine the final outcome, 3 structure the project, 4 prepare students for the language demands of step 5, 5 gather information, 6 prepare
students for the language demands of step 7, 7 compile and analyze information, PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
175
8 prepare students for the language demands of step 9, 9 present final product, and 10 evaluate the project.
To validate the development product as the designed materials, the evaluators were involved. Through the results of interview, questionnaires, and
field notes, it was concluded that the designed materials were appropriate to be implemented to the students. However, some revisions need to be done, covering
learning indicators, contents, activities, diction, instructions, language level, syllabuslesson plans, and material implementation. The suggestions were
accepted as the guideline to revise the materials. In answering the third question, to know whether the materials were
acceptable or not, the implementation of the materials was conducted. After implementing the materials, test, interview and field notes were utilized to obtain
the results. As the results, it was concluded that the materials were efficient, effective, and user-friendly. However, there were revisions on pictures, contents,
instructions, and material implementation. Furthermore, the result of the test indicated the value of sig. 2-tailed which was 0.001. This represented that H0 is
rejected. It means that there is significant difference between scores in pre-test and post-test.