Karakteristik Responden Berdasarkan Umur Karakteristik Responden Berdasarkan Jenis Kelamin Karakteristik Responden Berdasarkan Pendidikan Karakteristik Responden Berdasarkan Pekerjaan Karakteristik Responden Berdasarkan Suku Karakteristik Responden Berdas

A. Distribusi Frekwensi

a. Karakteristik Responden Berdasarkan Umur

Umur Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 20 -29 19 19.0 19.0 19.0 30 - 39 23 23.0 23.0 42.0 40 - 49 31 31.0 31.0 73.0 =50 27 27.0 27.0 100.0 Total 100 100.0 100.0

b. Karakteristik Responden Berdasarkan Jenis Kelamin

Jenis Kelamin Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Laki – laki 96 96.0 96.0 96.0 Perempuan 4 4.0 4.0 100.0 Total 100 100.0 100.0

c. Karakteristik Responden Berdasarkan Pendidikan

Pendidikan Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak tamat SD 13 13.0 13.0 13.0 Tamat SD 33 33.0 33.0 46.0 Tamat SLTP 27 27.0 27.0 73.0 Tamat SLTA 27 27.0 27.0 100.0 Total 100 100.0 100.0

d. Karakteristik Responden Berdasarkan Pekerjaan

Universitas Sumatera Utara Pekerjaan Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak belum bekerja 2 2.0 2.0 2.0 Buruh 21 21.0 21.0 23.0 Nelayan 37 37.0 37.0 60.0 PNSABRIPolri 2 2.0 2.0 62.0 Pegawai Sswasta 2 2.0 2.0 64.0 Pensiunan 7 7.0 7.0 71.0 Wiraswasta 29 29.0 29.0 100.0 Total 100 100.0 100.0

e. Karakteristik Responden Berdasarkan Suku

Suku Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Jawa 53 53.0 53.0 53.0 Melayu 15 15.0 15.0 68.0 Batak 19 19.0 19.0 87.0 Lainnya 13 13.0 13.0 100.0 Total 100 100.0 100.0

f. Karakteristik Responden Berdasarkan Lama Tinggal Di Kelurahan Bagan Deli

Lama Tinggal di Bagan Deli Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 - 5 tahun 13 13.0 13.0 13.0 6 - 10 tahun 12 12.0 12.0 25.0 16 - 20 tahun 14 14.0 14.0 39.0 = 21 tahun 61 61.0 61.0 100.0 Total 100 100.0 100.0

G. Distribusi frekwensi pengendalian secara modifikasi lingkungan

Universitas Sumatera Utara Modifikasi Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Baik 57 57.0 57.0 57.0 tidak Baik 43 43.0 43.0 100.0 Total 100 100.0 100.0

I. Distibusi Frekwensi Pengendalian Secara Manipulasi Lingkungan

Manipulasi Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Baik 40 40.0 40.0 40.0 tidak Baik 60 60.0 60.0 100.0 Total 100 100.0 100.0

J. Distribusi Frekwensi Pengendalian Secara Fisik

Pengendalian Secara Fisik Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Baik 33 33.0 33.0 33.0 tidak Baik 67 67.0 67.0 100.0 Total 100 100.0 100.0

K. Distribusi Frekwensi Pengendalian Secara Kimiawi

Pengendalian secara Kimia Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Baik 41 41.0 41.0 41.0 tidak Baik 59 59.0 59.0 100.0 Total 100 100.0 100.0

L. Distribusi Frekwensi Pengendalian Secara Biologis

Universitas Sumatera Utara Pengendalian secara Biologis Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Baik 25 25.0 25.0 25.0 tidak Baik 75 75.0 75.0 100.0 Total 100 100.0 100.0

M. Distribusi Frekwensi Program Survai Jentik

Survai Jentik Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Baik 58 58.0 58.0 58.0 tidak Baik 42 42.0 42.0 100.0 Total 100 100.0 100.0

N. Distribusi Frekwensi Program Abatisasi

Abatisasai Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Baik 42 42.0 42.0 42.0 tidak Baik 58 58.0 58.0 100.0 Total 100 100.0 100.0

O. Distribusi Frekwensi Program Fogging

Fogging Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Baik 42 42.0 42.0 42.0 tidak Baik 58 58.0 58.0 100.0 Total 100 100.0 100.0

P. Distibusi Frekwensi Program Penyuluhan Sosialisasi

Penyuluhan Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Baik 44 44.0 44.0 44.0 tidak Baik 56 56.0 56.0 100.0 Total 100 100.0 100.0 Universitas Sumatera Utara Keberadaan jentik Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Ada 33 33.0 33.0 33.0 Tidak ada 67 67.0 67.0 100.0 Total 100 100.0 100.0

II. Analisis Bivariat

A. Crosstabs Modifikasi Lingkungan

Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent Keberadaan jentik Modifikasi 100 100.0 .0 100 100.0 Modifikasi Keberadaan jentik Crosstabulation Keberadaan jentik Total Ada Tidak ada Modifikasi Tidak Baik Count 13 30 43 within Modifikasi 30.2 69.8 100.0 Baik Count 20 37 57 within Modifikasi 35.1 64.9 100.0 Total Count 33 67 100 within Modifikasi 33.0 67.0 100.0 Universitas Sumatera Utara Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. 2- sided Exact Sig. 2- sided Exact Sig. 1-sided Pearson Chi-Square .261 a 1 .609 Continuity Correction b .088 1 .767 Likelihood Ratio .262 1 .608 Fishers Exact Test .671 .385 Linear-by-Linear Association .259 1 .611 N of Valid Cases 100 a. 0 cells .0 have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14.19. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

B. Crosstabs Manipulasi Lingkungan

Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent Keberadaan jentik Manipulasi 100 100.0 .0 100 100.0 Manipulasi Keberadaan jentik Crosstabulation Keberadaan jentik Total Ada Tidak ada Manipulasi Tidak Baik Count 25 35 60 within Manipulasi 41.7 58.3 100.0 Baik Count 8 32 40 within Manipulasi 20.0 80.0 100.0 Total Count 33 67 100 within Manipulasi 33.0 67.0 100.0 Chi-Square Tests Universitas Sumatera Utara Value df Asymp. Sig. 2- sided Exact Sig. 2- sided Exact Sig. 1- sided Pearson Chi-Square 5.096 a 1 .024 Continuity Correction b 4.163 1 .041 Likelihood Ratio 5.300 1 .021 Fishers Exact Test .030 .019 Linear-by-Linear Association 5.045 1 .025 N of Valid Cases 100 a. 0 cells .0 have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13.20. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

C. Crosstabs Pengendalian Secara Fisik

Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent Keberadaan jentik Pengendalian Secara Fisik 100 100.0 .0 100 100.0 Pengendalian Secara Fisik Keberadaan jentik Crosstabulation Keberadaan jentik Total Ada Tidak ada Pengendalian Secara Fisik Tidak Baik Count 17 50 67 within Pengendalian Secara Fisik 25.4 74.6 100.0 Baik Count 16 17 33 within Pengendalian Secara Fisik 48.5 51.5 100.0 Total Count 33 67 100 within Pengendalian Secara Fisik 33.0 67.0 100.0 Universitas Sumatera Utara Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. 2- sided Exact Sig. 2- sided Exact Sig. 1-sided Pearson Chi-Square 5.342 a 1 .021 Continuity Correction b 4.347 1 .037 Likelihood Ratio 5.221 1 .022 Fishers Exact Test .025 .019 Linear-by-Linear Association 5.288 1 .021 N of Valid Cases 100 a. 0 cells .0 have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.89. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

D. Crosstabs Pengendalian Secara Kimiawi

Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent Keberadaan jentik Pengendalian secara Kimia 100 100.0 .0 100 100.0 Universitas Sumatera Utara Pengendalian secara Kimia Keberadaan jentik Crosstabulation Keberadaan jentik Total Ada Tidak ada Pengendalian secara Kimia Tidak Baik Count 25 34 59 within Pengendalian secara Kimia 42.4 57.6 100.0 Baik Count 8 33 41 within Pengendalian secara Kimia 19.5 80.5 100.0 Total Count 33 67 100 within Pengendalian secara Kimia 33.0 67.0 100.0 Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. 2- sided Exact Sig. 2- sided Exact Sig. 1- sided Pearson Chi-Square 5.718 a 1 .017 Continuity Correction b 4.731 1 .030 Likelihood Ratio 5.950 1 .015 Fishers Exact Test .019 .014 Linear-by-Linear Association 5.661 1 .017 N of Valid Cases 100 E. Crosstabs Pengendalian Secara Biologis Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent Keberadaan jentik Pengendalian secara Biologis 100 100.0 .0 100 100.0 Universitas Sumatera Utara Pengendalian secara Biologis Keberadaan jentik Crosstabulation Keberadaan jentik Total Ada Tidak ada Pengendalian secara Biologis Tidak Baik Count 24 51 75 within Pengendalian secara Biologis 32.0 68.0 100.0 Baik Count 9 16 25 within Pengendalian secara Biologis 36.0 64.0 100.0 Total Count 33 67 100 within Pengendalian secara Biologis 33.0 67.0 100.0 Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. 2- sided Exact Sig. 2- sided Exact Sig. 1- sided Pearson Chi-Square .136 a 1 .713 Continuity Correction b .015 1 .902 Likelihood Ratio .134 1 .714 Fishers Exact Test .807 .446 Linear-by-Linear Association .134 1 .714 N of Valid Cases 100 a. 0 cells .0 have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.25. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table Universitas Sumatera Utara

F. Crosstabs Program Survai Jentik

Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent Keberadaan jentik Survai Jentik 100 100.0 .0 100 100.0 Survai Jentik Keberadaan jentik Crosstabulation Keberadaan jentik Total Ada Tidak ada Survai Jentik Tidak Baik Count 13 29 42 within Survai Jentik 31.0 69.0 100.0 Baik Count 20 38 58 within Survai Jentik 34.5 65.5 100.0 Total Count 33 67 100 within Survai Jentik 33.0 67.0 100.0 Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. 2- sided Exact Sig. 2- sided Exact Sig. 1- sided Pearson Chi-Square .137 a 1 .711 Continuity Correction b .024 1 .877 Likelihood Ratio .138 1 .711 Fishers Exact Test .830 .440 Linear-by-Linear Association .136 1 .712 N of Valid Cases 100 a. 0 cells .0 have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13.86. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

G. Crosstabs Program Abatisasi

Universitas Sumatera Utara Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent Keberadaan jentik Abatisasai 100 100.0 .0 100 100.0 Abatisasai Keberadaan jentik Crosstabulation Keberadaan jentik Total Ada Tidak ada Abatisasai Tidak Baik Count 25 33 58 within Abatisasai 43.1 56.9 100.0 Baik Count 8 34 42 within Abatisasai 19.0 81.0 100.0 Total Count 33 67 100 within Abatisasai 33.0 67.0 100.0 Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. 2- sided Exact Sig. 2- sided Exact Sig. 1- sided Pearson Chi-Square 6.376 a 1 .012 Continuity Correction b 5.334 1 .021 Likelihood Ratio 6.637 1 .010 Fishers Exact Test .017 .010 Linear-by-Linear Association 6.312 1 .012 N of Valid Cases 100 a. 0 cells .0 have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13.86. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

H. Crosstabs Program Fogging

Universitas Sumatera Utara Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent Keberadaan jentik Fogging 100 100.0 .0 100 100.0 Fogging Keberadaan jentik Crosstabulation Keberadaan jentik Total Ada Tidak ada Fogging Tidak Baik Count 25 33 58 within Fogging 43.1 56.9 100.0 Baik Count 8 34 42 within Fogging 19.0 81.0 100.0 Total Count 33 67 100 within Fogging 33.0 67.0 100.0 Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. 2- sided Exact Sig. 2- sided Exact Sig. 1-sided Pearson Chi-Square 6.376 a 1 .012 Continuity Correction b 5.334 1 .021 Likelihood Ratio 6.637 1 .010 Fishers Exact Test .017 .010 Linear-by-Linear Association 6.312 1 .012 N of Valid Cases 100 a. 0 cells .0 have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13.86. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

I. Crosstabs Program Penyuluhan Sosialisasi

Universitas Sumatera Utara Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent Keberadaan jentik Penyuluhan 100 100.0 .0 100 100.0 Penyuluhan Keberadaan jentik Crosstabulation Keberadaan jentik Total Ada Tidak ada Penyuluhan Tidak Baik Count 25 31 56 within Penyuluhan 44.6 55.4 100.0 Baik Count 8 36 44 within Penyuluhan 18.2 81.8 100.0 Total Count 33 67 100 within Penyuluhan 33.0 67.0 100.0 Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. 2- sided Exact Sig. 2- sided Exact Sig. 1- sided Pearson Chi-Square 7.803 a 1 .005 Continuity Correction b 6.652 1 .010 Likelihood Ratio 8.123 1 .004 Fishers Exact Test .006 .004 Linear-by-Linear Association 7.725 1 .005 N of Valid Cases 100 a. 0 cells .0 have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14.52. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

III. Analisis Multivariat

Universitas Sumatera Utara Logistic Regression Case Processing Summary Unweighted Cases a N Percent Selected Cases Included in Analysis 100 100.0 Missing Cases .0 Total 100 100.0 Unselected Cases .0 Total 100 100.0 a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.