Proceedings of MatricesFor IITTEP – ICoMaNSEd 2015
ISBN: 978-602-74204-0-3
Biology Page 460
4. Research Results
Table 3. Preliminary analysis Results against the table content of NH3, TSS, pH, BOD and COD in waste water farm.
No Parameters S Units
Result Testing method
Quality standart
1 TSS
mgl 650,00
06-6989.3-2004 100 mgl
2 pH
- 7,08
06-6989.11-2004 6-9
3 BOD
mgl 485,00
06-6989.72-2009 100 mgl
4 COD
mgl 680,00
06-6989.27-2009 200 mgl
5 N-NH3
mgl 41,25
Method 8038 Nessler methodhach 25 mgl
The results of the test liquid waste Treatment after using hog farms water cress In 4 days After Planting.
4.1. Ammonia
Figure 1. The average content of NH3 mgl after the treatment plant biomass
From the results analysis of the content of ammonia contained in waste pig after being given the treatment plant biomass can be seen in the picture above that at 4 DAP observations
the average content of ammonia has decreased due to the treatment of biomass plants where the greater biomass treatment plants can reduce the content of ammonia in waste. After
analyzed in the variance by using SPSS 16, indicating that the treatment significantly influential on biomass extent
α of 0.05. Next to find out the difference of each treatment was continued with test LSD and Duncan test. Result of LSD and Duncan suggests that treatment
control 0 Kg do not differ markedly with biomass treatment 0.5 Kg Sig 0.14 0.05 but different biomass treatment against real 1.5 Kg Sig 0.003 0.05. As for the treatment of
0.5 Kg of different real against treatment 1.5 Kg can be seen in table LSD where Sig. 0,0240.05 or on Duncan value of treatment that are on a different subset. On the observation
results of the content analysis of the DAP 10 ammonia contained in waste pig after being given treatment plants can
be seen
in the image
above that the
average content of ammonia are experiencing the phenomenon with different treatment in observation 4 DAP
which is precisely and increase in ammonia content of biomass treatment plant where the result of the greater biomass treatment plant and increase in ammonia content in waste. After
further analyzed in the variance by using SPSS 16 shows that biomass treatment had no effect, significantly on the extent
α of 0.05 So it need not be forwarded with further test.
4.2. BOD Biochemical Oxygen Demand
On 4 and 10 DAP from the results of analysis of the content of the BOD in pig waste after being given treatment can be seen at the picture above that at 4 DAP observations the
average BOD content due to decreased plant biomass treatment where the greater biomass treatment plants can reduce the content of ammo SPSS 16 , indicating that biomass treatment
has no effect on the real
extent α of 0.05 so the results need not be tested further.
67,66 49
18 128
159,33 216
50 100
150 200
250
W0 W1
W2 4 DAP
10 DAP
Proceedings of MatricesFor IITTEP – ICoMaNSEd 2015
ISBN: 978-602-74204-0-3
Biology Page 461
Figure 2. The average content of BOD mgl after biomass plant treatment
While the results of the analysis content of the BOD in the pig waste treatment plant biomass after being given on 10 DAP, can be seen on the picture above the average content of BOD
still experienced a decline due to the treatment of biomass plants where the greater biomass treatment plants can reduce the content of BOD in waste. After further analyzed in the
variance by using program SPSS 16, suggest that the biomass treatment effect significantly lower levels of BOD on extent
α of 0.05. Next to find out the difference of each treatment was continued with LSD test and Duncan test result of LSD and Duncan pointed out that the
control treatment 0 Kg different biomass treatment with 0.5 Kg Sig. 0,016 0.05 and 1.5 Kg Sig.0.002 0.05 and on a different subset on Duncan. As for the treatment of 0.5 Kg did
not differ markedly against the treatment of 1.5 Kg of this can be seen in table LSD where Sig. 0,77 0.05 or on the value of the treatment of Duncan on the same subset.
4.3. COD Chemical Oxygen Demand