4. The Accuracy, Acceptability, and Readability of the CSIs Translation
This section contains the data findings based on the fourth formulated problem of this research which is the accuracy, acceptability, and readability
of the CSIs translation. This research employs three model instruments proposed by Nababan 2004 namely Accuracy Rating Instrument, Accuracy
Rating Instrument, and Readability Rating Instrument as the parameter and
the questionnaires distributed to the informants and the respondents to determine the scale of accuracy, acceptability, and readability of the CSIs
translation. According to the data findings and the results of questionnaires
distributed to the informants and the respondents, this research discovered that from the 77 data, 76 data 98.7 were considered accurate and only 1 datum
1.3 was considered less accurate. Meanwhile, there was no datum that can be considered as inaccurate. Furthermore, in terms of acceptability of the CSIs
translation, from the 77 data, 15 data 19.5 were considered acceptable, 12 data 15.6 were considered less acceptable, and 50 data 64.9 were
considered unacceptable. In addition, in terms of readability of the CSIs translation, from the 77 data, 15 data 19.5 were considered readable, 40
data 51.9 were considered less readable, and 22 data 28.6 were considered unreadable. The table of the frequency and percentage of the
accuracy, acceptability, and readability of the CSIs translation can be seen in Table 11.
Table 11. The Frequency and the Percentage of the Accuracy, Acceptability, and Readability of the CSIs Translation
No
Accuracy
Frequency Percentage
1 Accurate
76 98.7
2 Less Accurate
1 1.3
3 Inaccurate
- -
Total 77
100 Acceptability
1 Acceptable
15 19.5
2 Less Acceptable
12 15.6
3 Unacceptable
50 64.9
Total 77
100 Readability
1 Readable
15 19.5
2 Less Readable
40 51.9
3 Unreadable
22 28.6
Total 77
100
As the fact that the accuracy scale of the CSIs translation on the one side does not guarantee the acceptability and readability scale on the other
side. It may be found the data which are high scale in accuracy but they are low scale in acceptability and readability. The data findings can be seen in
Table 12 below.