Feedback from the Classroom Implementation
                                                                                107
Table 4.15 : Data Presentation of Students’ Responses on the Second Meeting
No Question
Response Total
Absolutely Yes Yes
Fair No
Number of
students Number
of students
Number of
students Number
of students
Number of
students 1
Are the listening activities enjoyable?
3 10
19 63
8 27
- -
30 100
2 Are the listening materials
enjoyable? 3
10 20
67 7
23 -
- 30
100 3
Are the listening materials easy to understand?
6 20
24 80
- -
- -
30 100
4 Are the recordings clear?
8 27
18 60
4 13
- -
30 100
5 Are the instructions in each
activity clear? 11
37 19
63 -
- -
- 30
100 6
Are the materials related to Visual communication
Design Program? 27
90 -
- -
- 3
10 30
100
Based on the result of the first questionnaires, 90 students answered they enjoyed  with  the  activities,  and  83  students  answered  they  enjoyed  with  the
materials. It showed that most of the students were enjoyed the listening activities and  the  materials.  Twenty  six  students  87  agreed  that  the  listening  materials
were  easy  to  understand.  Furthermore,  all  participants  answered  that  the instruction  in  each  activity  were  clear.  About  93  participants  agreed  that  the
listening materials were related to visual communication design. However, twenty three students 77 answered that recording was not clear. Only seven students
23 argued that the recording were clear. As  mentioned  before,  the  questionnaire  for  the  second  meeting  was
revised.  The  alternative  answered  was  changed  from  two  options  into  four options. From the second questionnaire, more than 50 of the participants agreed
that the listening and its materials were enjoyable. About 63 students answered the  listening  activities  were  enjoyable  and  67  of  them  stated  that  the  listening
materials were enjoyable. All participants also argued that listening materials were easy to understand. It was showed from the result that 80 students answered yes
and  another  20  answered  absolutely  yes.  Moreover,  60  students  argued  that the  recording  was  clear,  and  another  20  students  stated  that  the  recording  was
very  clear.  About  63  students  stated  that  the  instructions  in  each  activity  was quite clear, while 37 students that the instructions were very clear. Most of the
participants,  about  90  students,  agreed  that  the  materials  for  second  meeting were  related  to  Visual  Communication  Design  Program.  Only  10  students
answered  that  the  materials  were  not  related  to  Visual  Communication  Design Program.
Furthermore, the students’ responses from the open-form questions of the questionnaires can show their understanding of what they have learnt. On the first
meeting,  30  students  have  written  the  topic  and  also  kinds  activities  which  they done  on  the  first  meeting.  It  means  that  all  students  whom  fill  in  the
questionnaires  have  known  what  they  learnt  and  what  activities  they  got.  The students also mentioned the most interesting and difficult parts of all activities on
the  first  meeting.  Nineteen  students  mentioned  that  the  most  interesting  activity was  listening  activity.  They  wrote  that  the  listening  activity  was  easy  to
understand  and  it  was  fun  activity.  Nine  students  mentioned  that  vocabulary activity  was  the  most  interesting  part.  They  argued  that  in  this  activity  they  got
new  words  and  English  terms  of  their  vocational  program.  Moreover,  some students also wrote some parts that they found difficult. Listening activity was one
of the difficult activities. Twelve students said that listening activity was difficult because the recording was not clear. Another difficult part of the activities was the
questions part. Seven students mentioned that some questions were confusing. On the second meeting,  the writer conducted the rest of activities on unit
one.  Based  on  the  result  of  the  open-form  questions,  30  students  wrote the  topic and  also  the  activities  they  got  on  the  second  meeting.  It  can  be  said  that  all
students  recognized  what  they  have  learnt  as  well  as  on  the  first  meeting.  In addition,  19  students  mentioned  that  listening  activity  was  the  most  interesting
part. The students also wrote difficult part of the activities on the second meeting.
Eleven students mentioned that the comprehension practice was the most difficult part.  It  was  difficult  because  some  of  the  students  were  not  understood  the
questions given on the activity. Moreover, eight students stated that there was no difficult  part  from  the  activities  since  the  teacher  helped  them  to  understand  the
recording as well as the practice.  From 30 students, there were 6 students whom did  not  fill  in  the  most  difficult  part  of  the  activities.  Based  on  the  responses  of
open-form questions both from the first and second meeting, it can be concluded that most of the students knew what they have learnt and understood the materials.
In addition, the questionnaires provided spaces for the participants to write down their reasons or explanation about their  answers. There were  some reasons
on why students enjoyed and actively took part on the listening activities. Most of the students agreed that the listening activities were enjoyable both on the first and
the second meetings of classroom implementation. Some of them stated that it was fun because they learnt English materials related to their programs. They enjoyed
it  because  the  activities  were  carried  out  in  a  simple  and  relax  way.  Some  other argued  they  enjoyed  it  because  they  seldom  have  this  kind  of  activities.  On  the
second  meeting,  some  students  stated  that  they  enjoyed  with  the  listening materials  since  it  was  clearer  than  the  first  meeting’s  materials.  Some  other
mentioned  that  the  materials  were easy  to  understand  since it  was  still  related  to their vocational program.
The  students  also  gave  some  comments  and  suggestions  for  the  designed materials.  On  the  first  meeting,  most  of  them  stated  that  the  recording  was  not
really  clear.  They  suggested  providing  clearer  recording.  Some  others  suggested
adding listening to the music. From the second meeting, some students suggested that  the  activities  can  be  carried  out  in  more  fun  and  attractive  one.  Other
participants suggested that the activities can be added by games or listening to the music.
During  the  classroom  implementation,  the  writer  also  found  some weaknesses that were not recognized by the students. The writer realized that the
activities  were  not  done  according  to  the  lesson  plan.  According  to  the  lesson plan,  one  unit  was  planned  for  one  meeting  90  minutes.  However,  since  the
lesson  run  slower,  only  one  unit  can  be  implemented  on  two  meetings.  For  the recording materials, the writer recognized that some parts of the recordings were
not  clear.  Therefore,  it  needed  to  be  re-edited  into  clearer  recordings.  Moreover, the writer recognized that there were some parts on the  handbook that should be
revised.  The  vocabulary  activity  on  the  pre-task  section  did  not  show  TBLT techniques. The writer also found in unit 1 activity 5, one alternative answer was
missing  so  that  the  students  were  confused  to  find  the  correct  word.  In  addition, there was a question on unit 1, activity 6 that was not well arranged.
In a conclusion, it can be said that the classroom implementation run quite well.  Students  were  enjoyed  the  activities  as  well  as  the  listening  materials.  It
means  that  the  representative  of  the  designed  materials  was  appropriate  and acceptable.  Nevertheless,  since  there  were  some  weaknesses  and  suggestions  of
the  designed  materials  and  it’s  implementation,  revision  needed  to  be  performed to get much better materials.