Feedback from the Classroom Implementation
107
Table 4.15 : Data Presentation of Students’ Responses on the Second Meeting
No Question
Response Total
Absolutely Yes Yes
Fair No
Number of
students Number
of students
Number of
students Number
of students
Number of
students 1
Are the listening activities enjoyable?
3 10
19 63
8 27
- -
30 100
2 Are the listening materials
enjoyable? 3
10 20
67 7
23 -
- 30
100 3
Are the listening materials easy to understand?
6 20
24 80
- -
- -
30 100
4 Are the recordings clear?
8 27
18 60
4 13
- -
30 100
5 Are the instructions in each
activity clear? 11
37 19
63 -
- -
- 30
100 6
Are the materials related to Visual communication
Design Program? 27
90 -
- -
- 3
10 30
100
Based on the result of the first questionnaires, 90 students answered they enjoyed with the activities, and 83 students answered they enjoyed with the
materials. It showed that most of the students were enjoyed the listening activities and the materials. Twenty six students 87 agreed that the listening materials
were easy to understand. Furthermore, all participants answered that the instruction in each activity were clear. About 93 participants agreed that the
listening materials were related to visual communication design. However, twenty three students 77 answered that recording was not clear. Only seven students
23 argued that the recording were clear. As mentioned before, the questionnaire for the second meeting was
revised. The alternative answered was changed from two options into four options. From the second questionnaire, more than 50 of the participants agreed
that the listening and its materials were enjoyable. About 63 students answered the listening activities were enjoyable and 67 of them stated that the listening
materials were enjoyable. All participants also argued that listening materials were easy to understand. It was showed from the result that 80 students answered yes
and another 20 answered absolutely yes. Moreover, 60 students argued that the recording was clear, and another 20 students stated that the recording was
very clear. About 63 students stated that the instructions in each activity was quite clear, while 37 students that the instructions were very clear. Most of the
participants, about 90 students, agreed that the materials for second meeting were related to Visual Communication Design Program. Only 10 students
answered that the materials were not related to Visual Communication Design Program.
Furthermore, the students’ responses from the open-form questions of the questionnaires can show their understanding of what they have learnt. On the first
meeting, 30 students have written the topic and also kinds activities which they done on the first meeting. It means that all students whom fill in the
questionnaires have known what they learnt and what activities they got. The students also mentioned the most interesting and difficult parts of all activities on
the first meeting. Nineteen students mentioned that the most interesting activity was listening activity. They wrote that the listening activity was easy to
understand and it was fun activity. Nine students mentioned that vocabulary activity was the most interesting part. They argued that in this activity they got
new words and English terms of their vocational program. Moreover, some students also wrote some parts that they found difficult. Listening activity was one
of the difficult activities. Twelve students said that listening activity was difficult because the recording was not clear. Another difficult part of the activities was the
questions part. Seven students mentioned that some questions were confusing. On the second meeting, the writer conducted the rest of activities on unit
one. Based on the result of the open-form questions, 30 students wrote the topic and also the activities they got on the second meeting. It can be said that all
students recognized what they have learnt as well as on the first meeting. In addition, 19 students mentioned that listening activity was the most interesting
part. The students also wrote difficult part of the activities on the second meeting.
Eleven students mentioned that the comprehension practice was the most difficult part. It was difficult because some of the students were not understood the
questions given on the activity. Moreover, eight students stated that there was no difficult part from the activities since the teacher helped them to understand the
recording as well as the practice. From 30 students, there were 6 students whom did not fill in the most difficult part of the activities. Based on the responses of
open-form questions both from the first and second meeting, it can be concluded that most of the students knew what they have learnt and understood the materials.
In addition, the questionnaires provided spaces for the participants to write down their reasons or explanation about their answers. There were some reasons
on why students enjoyed and actively took part on the listening activities. Most of the students agreed that the listening activities were enjoyable both on the first and
the second meetings of classroom implementation. Some of them stated that it was fun because they learnt English materials related to their programs. They enjoyed
it because the activities were carried out in a simple and relax way. Some other argued they enjoyed it because they seldom have this kind of activities. On the
second meeting, some students stated that they enjoyed with the listening materials since it was clearer than the first meeting’s materials. Some other
mentioned that the materials were easy to understand since it was still related to their vocational program.
The students also gave some comments and suggestions for the designed materials. On the first meeting, most of them stated that the recording was not
really clear. They suggested providing clearer recording. Some others suggested
adding listening to the music. From the second meeting, some students suggested that the activities can be carried out in more fun and attractive one. Other
participants suggested that the activities can be added by games or listening to the music.
During the classroom implementation, the writer also found some weaknesses that were not recognized by the students. The writer realized that the
activities were not done according to the lesson plan. According to the lesson plan, one unit was planned for one meeting 90 minutes. However, since the
lesson run slower, only one unit can be implemented on two meetings. For the recording materials, the writer recognized that some parts of the recordings were
not clear. Therefore, it needed to be re-edited into clearer recordings. Moreover, the writer recognized that there were some parts on the handbook that should be
revised. The vocabulary activity on the pre-task section did not show TBLT techniques. The writer also found in unit 1 activity 5, one alternative answer was
missing so that the students were confused to find the correct word. In addition, there was a question on unit 1, activity 6 that was not well arranged.
In a conclusion, it can be said that the classroom implementation run quite well. Students were enjoyed the activities as well as the listening materials. It
means that the representative of the designed materials was appropriate and acceptable. Nevertheless, since there were some weaknesses and suggestions of
the designed materials and it’s implementation, revision needed to be performed to get much better materials.