Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 25
Contract, Delay Damages for Work of 0.10 of the contract price per day equivalent to
Rp.134,909,211 per day will be recommended to the authorities concerned.
A more detailed status of this Package is presented in ANNEX P-I Executive Summary Report. Package No. 2 : Padang Sawah
Sp. Empat Including Air Gadang Bridge
During the month, the progress works slightly improved in terms of slippage delayed works. The previous month slippage of
-7.95 slightly gained a positive improvement to
-7.36 this end of
month. The Construction of Air Gadang Bridge which is yet to be started and frequent breakdown of the
Asphalt Mixing Plant were the two 2 main factors which prevented to achieved substantial progress.
To date, the delayed work is still on the manageable level and not yet of much concern.
ANNEX P-2 Executive Summary Report present a more detailed status of the Contract Package. Package No. 3 : Manggopoh
Padang Sawah
The current slippage which further slipped down from -15.65
the previous month to -17.74
this month is of much concern due to the very limited remaining contract time left.
The main reason for the minimal progress was the delayed works on the asphalt pavement item which accounted for almost
56 of the entire contract as the Asphalt Mixing Plant is frequently out
of order. To date only 3 of entire work item is completed. Due to urgency to maximize the output of paving works to attain a modest progress, the Contractor
shall maintain the AMP regularly. In addition, a high level management meeting shall be scheduled as soon as possible in order to address and resolve all issues that are presently hampering the
progress of the works.
A more detailed status of the project progress are shown in ANNEX P-3 Executive Summary Report .
Package No. 4 : Ipuh Bantal
The current status of this contract package is similar with that of Package No. 1 wherein the negative slippage of
-18.88 incurred last month further slipped down to
-24.66 as of end of this
reporting month. The actual progress of only
8.10 since the project started eleven 11 months ago is of much
concern than the slippage. Simply looking at the percentage of work accomplished, it seems that the project is only on the mobilization period, whereas by this 11
th
month period, at least 32 of the works should have been completed by this time.
As mentioned in previous monthly progress reports, Show Cause Meetings and actual implementation of Test Case for a certain period of time were conducted, but the results never
produced any sign to improve the works progress.
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 26
Per CTC s understanding, there seems to be a major conflict between the two 2 joint venture firms creating an atmosphere of uncertainty resulting in mismanagement of the project implementation.
A warning letter was issued by the Supervision Consultant concerning the continuous delays that if no sign of the improving the progress in the coming month, Clause 8.7 of the Conditions of
Contract, Delay Damages for Work of 0.10 of the contract price per day equivalent to
Rp.186,936,750 per day will be recommended to the authorities concerned. As only
55 of the contract time is remaining with
92 of the Works still to be completed, a Show
Cause Meeting shall be scheduled immediately preferably a high level meeting to be held in DGH Central Office and to be attended by higher level managements of DGH, Contractor and other
concerned authorities.
It is suggested that the Contractor shall be required to submit a written commitment to deliver the Project to the Owner on the target date of completion.
Further suggest that the Contractor shall commit or submit the following : a Realistic and workable Action Plan
b Mobilize additional equipment at no additional cost to the Project c Mobilize additional manpower
d Infuse additional financial resources Cash flow e Catch-up schedule showing the remaining works to be programmed within the remaining
contract time.
Shown in ANNEX P-4 Executive Summary Report are the current problem and actions to be taken to attain substantial progress in order to catch-up with the schedule.
For contract packages under AWP-2 and AWP-3 which have a combined total of 17 Packages, a brief
summary of the actual activities and status as of this reporting period are presented in Table 1.1, page 7 of this Report.
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 27
4.5 Quality Assurance
The DSC will be responsible for quality assurance of materials and workmanship, certifying whether or not contractors have achieved the required results, as well as documentation and reporting based
on the financial management plan. They will prepare a Quality Assurance system covering all subprojects, and continuously monitor the effectiveness of their supervision procedures.
During the month of November 2014, the CTC s Quality Assurance Engineer conducted site inspection and quality assurance audits on one 1 on-going construction packages.
The following were the results and findings during the field visits :
Packages 1 : Biha - Krui
a Very minimal accomplished work were attained due to insufficient manpower and no sign of activities on location where there are no obstruction andor cleared areas
b Excavated material are stockpiled on the road shoulders and not disposed of properly. c Observed that Aggregate Class B was contaminated with mud and does not appear to be
homogenous segregation. d Weighing scale of the Asphalt Mixing Plant has been calibrated but weigh bridge truck
scale is not yet calibrated. e Warming signs on locations with work activities were not in placed.
f Placement of stones for stone masonry retaining wall were not in accordance with the method of construction.
g Routine maintenance of existing roads shoulders and travelled ways were not being implemented.
h In general, quality of workmanship on completed works were very poor. i Observed that excavation for side road drainage structure is too long 12Km but no
activity on construction of the concrete ditch. j Permit for the Base Camp and quarries were not yet issued by the Local Government.
4.6 Environmental and Social Considerations
4.6.1 Current Overall Situation
A project category is assigned to each package as either Category A, B or C depending on the likely degree of influence on environmental issues with a brief explanation as follows:
Category A project is one which will have a significant negative impact on the environment and may have an influence on areas outside the actual project area. A project classified as such requires an
AMDAL ANDAL, RKLRPL study. Category B project is one which affects the people or the environment to some extent but with a
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 28
smaller impact than a Category A. The required environmental analysis is a UKLUPL study only. Category C project has minimal effect on the people or environment and an environmental analysis
is not required. SPPL are used to handle any minor problem which may arise. All the twenty one 21 packages require environmental impact investigations. There are a total of
fourty one 41 studies required, twenty 20 for environmental impact investigations and twenty one 21 for social studies.
The twenty 20 environmental studies need the approval of the Environmental Agency BLH with five 5 of the studies AMDALEIA to be approved by World Bank WB.
While the twenty one 21 social studies SLARAP and LARAP require the approval of World Bank prior to implementation.
As of end of this reporting period November 2014, twenty 20 environmental impact studies has been approved by BLH, while all of the five 5 studies that requires World Bank approval, Bank
already issued No Objection Letter NOL. For the social studies , twelve 12 of the twenty one 21 studies were already given No Objection
Letter from the World Bank WB. Details of sub-projects that require environmental and social safeguards and progress are shown in
Appendix E.
Presented below in a tabulated format is the current status of the environmental and social studies.
Works Program
No of Packages
No of Investigations Approval by
Remarks BLH
World Bank
AWP-1 4
11 AMDAL x 1
UKLUPL x 2 SPPL x 4
Full LARAP x 4 1 AMDAL 1
UKLUPL 4 SPPL
1 EIA, NOL Issued by WB
4 Full LARAP
Approved NOL issued
by WB LARAP and AMDAL paket 117,
except for SPPL. UKL-UPL for Package
No.4 processing of environmental permit
was recommended by BLH Kab. Muko-muko
and environmental permit on 4 Dec 2014
AWP-2 9
17 AMDAL Study x 4
UKLUPL x 4 Simple LARAP x 1
Full LARAP x 8 4 UKLUPL
4 AMDAL 1 Simple
LARAP; 3 Full LARAP
4 EIA, NOL Issued by WB
1 one Study AMDAL for three packages.
Packages No.7, 12 and 14 packages on AWP2
AWP3.
1 one Study AMDAL for two packages.
Packages No.11 16. packages on AWP2
AWP3.
AWP-3 8
13 AMDAL OK =
EIA same with Approved
NOL issued
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 29
Works Program
No of Packages
No of Investigations Approval by
Remarks BLH
World Bank
Full LARAP x 4 Simple LARAP x 4
AMDAL Study x 1= Paket No.1 AWP 1
UKLUPL x 5 paket No.1
17 AWP1 5 UKLUPL
Package 1 1 Simple
LARAP; 3 Full LARAP
by WB include AMDAL except for UKLUPL
Total 21
41 Env=20,Soc=21
20 12
Note: UKL UPL do not need a NOL from WB, and SPPL not necessary to submit to the WB.
Appendix E shows the Progress of Environmental Safeguard Studies. 4.6.2 Environmental and Social Issues
This section outlines the activities of the Social Impact Specialist and the Environmental Specialist during November 2014.
4.6.2.1 Environmental Issues
Contractors for Packages No.2 and No.3 submitted the final RKPPL Program for Executing Environmental Management Plan to PMUCTC. The RKPPL is under process for formal submission to
World Bank. CTC conducted review of RKPPL for Package No.1 and No.4 which were returned to the Contractors
for final revisions.
1. Monitoring of Environmental Aspects During Construction
CTC provided monitoring forms to DSC for use in monitoring of environmental and social impacts. These forms are to be used every month by the DSC Environmental Specialist.
CTC s environmental staffs actively advises DSC on environmental monitoring, but DSC have not directly carried out monitoring or to implement the Environmental and Social Analysis Management
Plan for WINRIP.
To date, only the DSC s Site Engineer of Package 1 have regularly submitting the monthly environmental mitigation reports. Site Engineers of Packages 2,3 and 4 have never submitted any
report.
CTC issued letter to DSC on July 23, 2014 requiring DSC to submit the Reports at each end of the month.
Environmental Monitoring Report for the month of November 2014 have not yet been submitted by DSC to CTC.
2. Design Integration, Road Safety Aspects and Monitoring of Environmental Studies
Task 5.8.0 of CTC-2 TOR Implement the Environmental and Social Analysis Management PlanESAMP and paragraf 10.9 of the PMM requires ensuring that environmental management
aspects of contracts have been implemented in accordance with AMDAL, UKLUPL, SPPL studies and
