LAMPIRAN 3 FREKUENSI KARAKTERISTIK RESPONDEN
a. Berdasarkan Jenis Kelamin Jenis Kelamin
Frequency Percent
Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid Pria Wanita
Total 17
18 35
48.6 51.4
100 48.6
51.4 100
48.6 100
b. Berdasarkan Usia Usia
Frequency Percent
Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 21-30 31-40
41-50 50
Total 4
14 14
3 35
11.4 40
40 8.6
100 11.4
40 40
8.6 100
11.4 51.4
91.4 100
c. Berdasarkan Tingkat Pendidikan Tingkat Pendidikan
Frequency Percent
Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid S2 S1
Diploma SMA
Total 6
7 12
10 35
17.1 20
34.3 28.6
100 17.1
20 34.3
28.6 100
17.1 37.1
71.4 100
d. Berdasarkan Masa Kerja Masa Kerja
Frequency Percent
Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 5 6-15
16-25 Total
5 11
19 35
14.3 31.4
54.3 100
14.3 31.4
54.3 100
14.3 45.7
100
Universitas Sumatera Utara
LAMPIRAN 4 FREKUENSI JAWABAN RESPONDEN
TERHADAP VARIABEL KOMPETENSI X
1
P1
Frequency Percent
Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 1.00 2.00
3.00 4.00
Total 14
21 35
40 60
100 40
60 100
40 100
P2
Frequency Percent
Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 1.00 2.00
3.00 4.00
Total 21
14 35
60 40
100 60
40 100
60 100
P3
Frequency Percent
Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 1.00 2.00
3.00 4.00
Total 6
21 8
35 17.1
60 22.9
100 17.1
60 22.9
100 17.1
77.1 100
P4
Frequency Percent
Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 1.00 2.00
3.00 4.00
Total 1
15 19
35 2.9
42.8 54.3
100 2.9
42.8 54.3
100 2.9
45.7 100
P5
Frequency Percent
Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 1.00 2.00
3.00 4.00
Total 3
11 21
35 8.6
31.4 60
100 8.6
31.4 60
100 8.6
40 100
Universitas Sumatera Utara
P6
Frequency Percent
Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 1.00 2.00
3.00 4.00
Total 7
9 19
35 20
25.7 54.3
100 20
25.7 54.3
100 20
45.7 100
P7
Frequency Percent
Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 1.00 2.00
3.00 4.00
Total 18
12 5
35 51.4
34.3 14.3
100 51.4
34.3 14.3
100 51.4
85.7 100
P8
Frequency Percent
Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 1.00 2.00
3.00 4.00
Total 3
11 21
35 8.6
31.4 60
100 8.6
31.4 60
100 8.6
40 100
Universitas Sumatera Utara
LAMPIRAN 5 FREKUENSI JAWABAN RESPONDEN
TERHADAP VARIABEL IKLIM ORGANISASI X
2
P9
Frequency Percent
Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 1.00 2.00
3.00 4.00
Total 12
23 35
34.3 65.7
100 34.3
65.7 100
34.3 100
100
P10
Frequency Percent
Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 1.00 2.00
3.00 4.00
Total 14
21 35
40 60
100 40
60 100
40 100
P11
Frequency Percent
Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 1.00 2.00
3.00 4.00
Total 1
11 23
35 2.9
31.4 65.7
100 2.9
31.4 65.7
100 2.9
34.3 100
P12
Frequency Percent
Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 1.00 2.00
3.00 4.00
Total 12
23 35
34.3 65.7
100 34.3
65.7 100
34.3 100
P13
Frequency Percent
Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 1.00 2.00
3.00 4.00
Total 3
3 29
35 8.6
8.6 82.8
100 8.6
8.6 82.8
100 8.6
17.2 100
Universitas Sumatera Utara
P14
Frequency Percent
Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 1.00 2.00
3.00 4.00
Total 5
30 35
14.3 85.7
100 14.3
85.7 100
14.3 100
P15
Frequency Percent
Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 1.00 2.00
3.00 4.00
Total 5
30 35
14.3 85.7
100 14.3
85.7 100
14.3 100
P16
Frequency Percent
Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 1.00 2.00
3.00 4.00
Total 23
12 35
65.7 34.3
100 65.7
34.3 100
65.7 100
P17
Frequency Percent
Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 1.00 2.00
3.00 4.00
Total 27
8 35
77.1 22.9
100 77.1
22.9 100
77.1 100
P18
Frequency Percent
Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 1.00 2.00
3.00 4.00
Total 3
28 4
35 8.6
80 11.4
100 8.6
80 11.4
100 8.6
88.6 100
Universitas Sumatera Utara
P19
Frequency Percent
Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 1.00 2.00
3.00 4.00
Total 3
7 25
35 8.6
20 71.4
100 8.6
20 71.4
100 8.6
28.6 100
P20
Frequency Percent
Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 1.00 2.00
3.00 4.00
Total 3
5 27
35 8.6
14.3 77.1
100 8.6
14.3 77.1
100 8.6
22.9 100
Universitas Sumatera Utara
LAMPIRAN 6 FREKUENSI JAWABAN RESPONDEN
TERHADAP VARIABEL KEPUASAN KERJA Y P21
Frequency Percent
Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 1.00 2.00
3.00 4.00
Total 5
30 35
14.3 85.7
100 14.3
85.7 100
14.3 100
P22
Frequency Percent
Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 1.00 2.00
3.00 4.00
Total 11
24 35
31.4 68.6
100 31.4
68.6 100
31.4 100
P23
Frequency Percent
Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 1.00 2.00
3.00 4.00
Total 24
11 35
68.6 31.4
100 68.6
31.4 100
68.6 100
P24
Frequency Percent
Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 1.00 2.00
3.00 4.00
Total 1
34 35
2.9 97.1
100 2.9
97.1 100
2.9 100
P25
Frequency Percent
Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 1.00 2.00
3.00 4.00
Total 30
5 35
85.7 14.3
100 85.7
14.3 100
85.7 100
Universitas Sumatera Utara
P26
Frequency Percent
Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 1.00 2.00
3.00 4.00
Total 1
15 19
35 2.9
42.8 54.3
100 2.9
42.8 54.3
100 2.9
45.7 100
P27
Frequency Percent
Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 1.00 2.00
3.00 4.00
Total 3
17 15
35 8.6
48.6 42.8
100 8.6
48.6 42.8
100 8.6
57.2 100
P28
Frequency Percent
Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 1.00 2.00
3.00 4.00
Total 5
21 9
35 14.3
60 25.7
100 14.3
60 25.7
100 14.3
74.3 100
P29
Frequency Percent
Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 1.00 2.00
3.00 4.00
Total 12
23 35
34.3 65.7
100 34.3
65.7 100
34.3 100
P30
Frequency Percent
Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 1.00 2.00
3.00 4.00
Total 14
14 7
35 40
40 20
100 40
40 20
100 40
80 100
Universitas Sumatera Utara
LAMPIRAN 7 DISTRIBUSI JAWABAN RESPONDEN TERHADAP PERNYATAAN
VARIABEL X
1
KOMPETENSI No
Kompetensi X
1
Total P1
P2 P3
P4 P5
P6 P7
P8 R1
2 3
3 3
3 2
2 3
22
R2 2
3 3
3 3
2 2
3 21
R3
2 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
23
R4 2
3 3
3 3
2 2
3 21
R5 2
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 23
R6 2
3 3
3 3
3 2
3 22
R7 2
3 4
3 3
2 3
3 23
R8 2
3 3
3 3
2 3
3 22
R9 2
3 4
3 3
3 3
3 24
R10
3 4
3 2
2 2
3 2
21
R11 3
4 3
2 2
3 3
2 22
R12 2
4 3
2 2
3 4
1 21
R13
2 4
4 2
2 3
2 2
21
R14 3
4 3
2 2
2 2
2 20
R15 3
4 4
2 2
3 2
2 22
R16 2
4 3
2 2
2 2
2 19
R17
3 3
4 2
2 3
2 2
21
R18 3
4 3
2 2
2 2
2 20
R19 3
3 3
2 2
3 2
2 20
R20
2 4
2 3
3 3
2 3
22
R21 3
4 4
3 3
3 3
3 26
R22 2
4 2
3 3
3 2
3 22
R23 3
4 2
3 3
3 3
3 24
R24 3
3 4
2 2
3 2
2 21
R25 3
3 3
2 1
3 3
2 20
R26 3
3 4
2 1
3 2
1 19
R27
3 3
3 2
1 3
3 1
19
R28 3
4 2
3 3
1 4
3 23
R29 3
4 2
3 3
1 3
3 22
R30
3 3
3 3
3 1
4 3
23
R31 3
3 3
3 3
1 4
3 21
R32 3
3 2
3 3
1 4
3 22
R33
3 3
3 3
3 1
4 3
23
R34 3
3 3
2 3
2 2
3 21
R35 3
3 3
1 3
1 2
3 19
Universitas Sumatera Utara
LAMPIRAN 8 DISTRIBUSI JAWABAN RESPONDEN TERHADAP PERNYATAAN
VARIABEL X
2
IKLIM ORGANISASI No
Iklim Organisasi X
2
Total P9 P10 P11 P12 P13 P14 P15 P16 P17 P18 P19 P20
R1
3 2
3 3
3 3
2 3
3 2
2 3
32
R2 3
2 3
3 3
3 2
3 3
2 3
3 33
R3 3
2 3
3 3
3 3
2 3
2 2
3 32
R4
3 2
3 3
3 3
3 2
3 2
2 3
32
R5 3
2 3
3 3
3 3
2 3
2 2
3 32
R6 3
2 3
3 3
3 3
2 3
2 2
3 32
R7 3
2 3
3 3
3 2
3 3
2 2
3 32
R8
3 2
3 3
3 2
3 2
3 2
1 3
30
R9 3
2 3
3 3
3 3
2 2
2 3
3 32
R10 3
2 3
3 3
3 3
2 2
2 1
3 30
R11
3 2
3 3
3 3
3 2
2 2
1 3
30
R12 3
3 3
3 3
2 3
2 2
2 3
3 32
R13 2
3 3
3 3
3 3
2 2
2 3
3 32
R14
3 2
3 3
3 2
3 2
2 2
3 3
31
R15 2
3 3
3 3
3 3
2 2
2 3
3 32
R16 3
3 3
3 3
2 3
2 2
2 3
3 32
R17 2
3 3
3 3
3 3
2 2
2 3
3 32
R18 3
2 3
3 3
2 3
2 2
2 3
3 33
R19 3
2 3
3 3
3 3
2 2
2 3
3 32
R20 2
3 2
3 3
3 3
3 2
2 3
3 32
R21
2 3
2 3
3 3
3 3
2 2
3 3
32
R22 2
3 2
3 3
3 3
3 2
2 3
3 32
R23 2
3 2
2 3
3 3
3 2
2 3
3 31
R24
3 3
3 2
1 3
3 2
2 2
3 3
30
R25 2
3 3
2 2
3 3
3 2
2 3
3 31
R26 3
3 3
2 1
3 3
2 2
2 3
3 30
R27 3
3 3
2 1
3 3
3 2
2 3
3 31
R28
3 3
2 2
3 3
2 3
2 2
3 2
30
R29 3
3 2
2 3
3 3
3 2
1 3
2 30
R30 2
3 2
2 3
3 2
3 2
1 3
2 28
R31
2 3
2 2
3 3
2 3
2 1
3 2
27
R32 2
3 1
2 3
3 3
3 2
3 3
2 30
R33 2
3 2
2 2
3 2
3 2
3 3
1 28
R34 3
3 2
2 3
3 2
2 2
3 3
1 29
R35 3
3 2
2 3
3 3
3 2
3 3
1 31
Universitas Sumatera Utara
LAMPIRAN 9 DISTRIBUSI JAWABAN RESPONDEN TERHADAP PERNYATAAN
VARIABEL YKEPUASAN KERJA No
Kepuasan Kerja Y Total
P21 P22 P23
P24 P25 P26 P27 P28
P29 P30
R1 2
3 2
1 2
2 3
2 3
2 22
R2 2
3 3
2 2
2 3
2 3
2 24
R3
2 3
3 2
2 2
2 2
3 2
23
R4 2
3 3
2 2
2 3
2 3
2 24
R5 2
3 3
2 2
2 3
2 3
2 24
R6 3
3 3
2 2
2 3
2 3
2 25
R7 3
3 3
2 2
2 3
2 3
2 25
R8 3
3 3
2 2
2 3
2 3
2 25
R9 3
3 2
2 2
2 2
2 3
2 23
R10
3 3
3 2
2 3
2 2
3 2
25
R11 3
3 2
2 2
2 2
2 3
2 23
R12 3
2 2
2 2
3 2
2 2
1 21
R13
3 2
2 2
2 3
2 2
2 2
22
R14 3
2 2
2 2
3 2
2 2
1 21
R15 3
2 2
2 2
2 1
2 2
1 19
R16 3
2 2
2 2
3 2
2 2
2 22
R17
3 2
2 2
2 3
3 2
2 1
22
R18 3
2 2
2 2
3 2
2 2
1 21
R19 3
2 3
2 2
3 1
2 2
1 21
R20
3 3
2 2
2 2
2 2
3 1
22
R21 3
2 2
2 2
3 2
2 3
1 23
R22 3
3 2
2 2
3 2
3 3
1 24
R23 3
2 2
2 2
1 2
2 3
1 21
R24 3
3 2
2 2
3 2
3 2
1 23
R25 3
3 2
2 2
3 2
3 2
1 23
R26 3
3 2
2 2
3 3
3 2
1 23
R27
3 3
2 2
2 3
2 3
2 1
23
R28 3
2 2
2 2
2 3
3 3
3 25
R29 3
3 2
2 2
3 3
3 3
3 27
R30
3 3
2 2
2 2
3 3
3 2
25
R31 3
3 2
2 3
3 3
1 3
3 26
R32 3
3 2
2 3
2 3
1 3
3 25
R33
3 3
2 2
3 3
1 1
3 3
24
R34 3
3 3
2 3
3 3
1 3
3 27
R35 3
3 3
2 3
3 3
1 3
3 27
Universitas Sumatera Utara
LAMPIRAN 10 UJI ASUMSI KLASIK
1. Uji Normalitas
Universitas Sumatera Utara
One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Unstandardized Residual
N 35
Normal Parameters
a,b
Mean .0000000
Std. Deviation 1.06073524
Most Extreme Differences
Absolute .113
Positive .113
Negative -.095
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .671
Asymp. Sig. 2-tailed .759
a. Test distribution is Normal. b. Calculated from data
2. Uji Heteroskedastisitas
Coefficients
a
Model Unstandardized Coefficients
Standardized Coefficients
t Sig.
B Std. Error
Beta Constant
1,003E-013 2,449
,000 1,000
Kompetensi ,000
,089 ,000
,000 1,000
Iklim Organisasi ,000
,072 ,000
,000 1,000
a. Dependent Variable: AbsUt
Universitas Sumatera Utara
3. Uji Multikolinieritas
Coefficients
a
Model Unstandardized
Coefficients Standardized
Coefficients t
Sig. Collinearity
Statistic B
Std. Error
Beta Tolerance
VIF 1
Constant 10.437
2.449 4.261 .000
Kompetensi .254
.089 .359
2.847 .008 .965
1.037 Iklim Organisasi
.315 .072
.553 4.388 .000
.965 1.037
a. Dependent Variable: Kepuasan Kerja
Universitas Sumatera Utara
LAMPIRAN 11 REGRESI LINIER BERGANDA
Coefficients
a
Model Unstandardized Coefficients
Standardized Coefficients
t Sig.
B Std. Error
Beta 1
Constant 10.437
2.449 4.261
.000 Kompetensi
.254 .089
.359 2.847
.008 Iklim Organisasi
.315 .072
.553 4.388
.000 a. Dependent Variable: Kepuasan Kerja
Universitas Sumatera Utara
LAMPIRAN 12 UJI HIPOTESIS
1. Uji Signifikan Simultan Uji-F
ANOVA
a
Model Sum of Squares
df Mean Square
F Sig.
1 Regression
39.745 2
19.872 16.623
.000
b
Residual 38.255
32 1.195
Total 78.000
34 a. Dependent Variable: Kepuasan Kerja
b. Predictors: Constant, Iklim Organisasi, Kompetensi
2. Uji Signifikan Parsial Uji-t
Coefficients
a
Model Unstandardized Coefficients
Standardized Coefficients
t Sig.
B Std. Error
Beta 1
Constant 10.437
2.449 4.261
.000 Kompetensi
.254 .089
.359 2.847
.008 Iklim Organisasi
.315 .072
.553 4.388
.000 b. Dependent Variable: Kepuasan Kerja
3. Uji Koefisien Determinasi R
2
Model Summary
Model R
R Square Adjusted R
Square Std. Error of the
Estimate 1
.735
a
.540 .531
1.093 a. Predictors: Constant, Iklim Organisasi, Kompetensi
Universitas Sumatera Utara
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Buku:
Blaxter, Loraine, et. al., 2006. How To Research: Seluk Beluk Melakukan Riset, Indeks, Jakarta.
Dharma, Surya, 2009. Manajemen Kinerja: Falsafah, Teori dan Penerapannya, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta.
Erlina, 2011. Metodologi Penelitian, USU Press, Medan. Fatma, dkk., 2007. Aplikasi Statistical Product Service Solution, USU Press,
Medan. Flippo, Edwin B., 2006. Manajemen Personalia, Alih Bahasa Moh. Mas’ud, Edisi
Keenam Jilid 2, Penerbit Erlangga, Jakarta. Hasibuan, Malayu, 2008. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Edisi Revisi, Bumi
Aksara, Jakarta. Luthans, Fred,2006. Perilaku Organisasi, Alih Bahasa V. A Yuwono, Edisi
Sepuluh, Penerbit Andi, Yogyakarta. Mangkunegara, Anwar Prabu, 2006. Evaluasi Kinerja SDM, Cetakan Ketiga,
Refika Aditama, Bandung. Mathis, Robert dan John H. Jackson, 2009. Human Resource Management, Edisi
Terjemahan, Salemba Empat, Jakarta. Palan, R., 2007. Competency Management: Teknik Mengimplementasikan
Manajemen SDM Berbasis Kompetensi Untuk Meningkatkan Daya Saing Organisasi, Edisi Terjemahan, Anggota IKAPI, Jakarta.
Pasukat, dkk., 2014. Penuntun Praktikum Analisis Regresi, Program Studi Statistik, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan.
Rivai, Veithzal, 2009. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Untuk Perusahaan: Dari Teori Ke Praktek, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.
Robbins, Stepen, 2007. Perilaku Organisasi, Terjemahan: Benyamin Molan,Selemba Empat, Jakarta.
______________ Timothy A. Judge, 2008. Perilaku Organisasi, Edisi 12, Buku Satu,Salemba Empat, Jakarta.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Ruky, A., 2006. Sumber Daya Manusia Berkualitas Mengubah Visi Menjadi Realitas, Cetakan Kedua, PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.
Simamora, Henry, 2006. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, STIE YKKPN, Yogyakarta.
Sopiah, 2008. Perilaku Organisasi, Penerbit Andi, Bandung. Sugiyono, 2012. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan RD, Alfabeta,
Bandung. Umar, Husein, 2008.Desain Penelitian MSDM dan Perilaku Karyawan:
Paradigma Positivistik dan Berbasis Pemecahan Masalah, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
_____________ 2008. Metode Penelitian Untuk Skripsi dan Tesis Bisnis, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Wibowo, 2007. Manajemen Kinerja, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta. Wirawan, 2007. Budaya dan Iklim Kerja Teori dan Aplikasi Penelitian, Salemba
Empat, Jakarta.
Jurnal:
Ahmad, Zulfqar, Zafar Ahmad, et al., 2010. “Organizational Climate as Employees’ Satisfier: Empirical Evidence From Pharmaceutical Sector”,
International Journal of Business and Management
Batagarawa, Aminu Ibrahim Zaidatol Akmaliah, 2014. “Relationship Between Office Competencies and Job Satisfaction Among Administrative Support
Personnel”, , Volume 5 Number 10
pp 214-222.
International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Literature,
Dash, Srinisbash, J. Mohapatra, et al., 2013. “A Correlation of HRD Climate With Job Satisfaction of Employees: An Empirical Investigation on MCL, Burla,
Sambalpur, Odisha”, Volume 2 Number 12 pp 55-65.
International Journal of Research In Business Management
, Volume 1 Number 2 pp 11-26. Idrus, Muhammad, 2006. “Implikasi Iklim Organisasi Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja
dan Kualitas Kehidupan Kerja Karyawan”, Jurnal Psikologi UniversitasDiponegoro
,Volume 3 Nomor 1 hal. 94-106.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Juwono, Onny, Yuliana Wangsadinata, 2010. “Kreativitas, Gaya Kepemimpinan dan KompetensiDalam Membentuk Kepuasan Kerja Karyawan”, Journal
The Winners, Volume 11 Nomor 1 hal. 55-65.
Khan, Irfan, Kashif Ahmed, et al., 2015. “Impact of HR Competencies on Employees’ Job Satisfaction”, Journal of Resources Development and
Management Lubis, Yusniar, 2012. “Pengaruh Karakteristik Individu, Karakteristik Pekerjaan,
Iklim Organisasi Terhadap Kepuasan dan Kinerja Karyawan”, , Volume 5 Number 1 pp 15-28.
Jurnal
Trikonomika,
Volume 11 Nomor 2 hal. 212-228. Muindi, Florence Peter K’Obonyo, 2015. ”Quality of Work Life, Personality, Job Satisfaction,
Competence and Job Performance: A Critical Review of Literature”, European Scientific Journal
, Volume 11 Number 26 pp 223-240.
Sari, Elviera, 2009. “Pengaruh Kompensasi dan Iklim Organisasi terhadap Kepuasan Kerja”, Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Organisasi
, Volume 16 Nomor 1 hal. 18-24.
Sari, Fajar Maya, 2013. “Pengaruh Kompetensi dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja dan Kinerja Guru di SD Negeri Kecamatan Gondang
Mojokerto”,Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi dan Manajemen , Volume 9 Nomor 2 hal.
137 – 153. Tsai, Chaur-luh, 2014. “The Organizational Climate and Employees’ Job
Satisfaction in The Terminal Operation Context of Kaohsiung Port”, The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics
, Volume 30 Number 3 pp 373-392.
Tesis:
Manullang, Anna Irene, 2010. “Analisis Pengaruh Karakteristik Individu dan IklimOrganisasi Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Perawat di Ruang Rawat Inap
RSUD Dr. Djasamen SaragihKota Pematangsiantar”, Tesis, Program Studi Magister Ilmu Manajemen, Universitas SumateraUtara, Medan.
Sambas, Djamaluddin, 2008. “Pengaruh Kompetensi dan Iklim Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Staf di Unit Penunjang Medik Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat H. Adam
Malik Medan”, Tesis, Program Studi Administrasi dan Kebijakan Kesehatan, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
BAB III METODE PENELITIAN
Menurut Sugiyono 2012 : 2metode penelitian pada dasarnya merupakan cara ilmiah untuk mendapatkan data dengan tujuan dan kegunaan tertentu. Cara
ilmiah berarti kegiatan penelitian itu didasarkan pada ciri-ciri keilmuan, yaitu rasional, empiris dan sistematis. Metode penelitian berhubungan erat dengan
prosedur, teknik, alat serta desain penelitian yang digunakan.
3.1 Jenis Penelitian