b. Classification of ESP
Hutchinson and Waters 1987: 16-17 divide ESP into two main types differentiated according to whether the learner requires English for academic
study EAP: English for Academic Purposes or for worktraining EOPEVPVESL: English for Occupational Purposes English for Vocational
Purposes Vocational English as a Second Language. At the next level, it is also possible to distinguish ESP courses by the
general nature of the learner’s specialization. Here, the levels are usually identified into three large categories namely: EST English for Science and
Technology, EBE English for Business and Economics, and ESS English for Social Sciences. Times of learning are pre-study, in-study, and post-
study. The clearer explanation about ESP is in the following figure:
English Language Teaching ELT
English as L1EMT English as Foreign Language EFL English as L2ESL
General English GE English for Specific PurposesESP
English for Business English for Science
English for Social Sciences and EconomicsEBE
and TechnologyEST ESS
EAP EOPEVP
EAP EOPEVP
EAP EOPEVP
Figure 2.1. The Branch of ELT, taken from English for Specific Purposes by Hutchinson and Waters 1987: 17
ESL can be divided in the
same way as
EFL
The writer classified „A Set of English Instructional Speaking
Materials for the Registration and Information staff of Panti Rapih hospital using CLT
’ into English for Occupational or Vocational Purposes EOP under the English for Business and Economics EBE since the Registration
and Information staff need English for their occupation. Mackay and Mountford as cited in Robinson, 1980: 6 suggest three
kind of purpose in ESP:
1 Occupational requirements, e.g. for international telephone operators, civil airline pilots, etc.
2 Vocational training programs, e.g. for hotel and catering staff, technical trades, etc.
3 Academic or professional study, e.g. engineering, medicine, law, etc.
Strevens as cited in Robinson, 1980: 6- 7 suggests that „All special
purpose language teaching courses are either occupational or educational in nature.’ He makes a further three-way distinction according to the timing
courses, and produces the following figure:
Figure 2.2. Three-way Distinction According to the Timing of Courses by Strevens pg. 81, as cited in Robinson, 1980: 7
Pre - experience Simultaneous
In - study Post - experience
Pre - study
Post - study Occupational
Educational SP
– LT or ESP
ESP course
Syllabus
Methodology
Nature of particular
target and learning
situation
HOW?
Learning theories
WHAT?
Language descriptions
WHO? WHY? WHERE?
WHEN?
Needs analysis
c. ESP Course Design