Kepatuhan terhadap Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

188 Tabel 14. Hasil Output SPSS 20 Uji Validitas Variabel X 4 Correlations X4.1 X4.2 X4.3 X4.4 X4.5 X4.6 X4.7 X4.8 X4.9 X4.10 X4.11 X4.12 X4.13 X4.14 X4.15 X4.16 Total X4 X4.1 Pearson Correlation 1 .935 .935 .700 .802 .866 .873 .732 .800 .590 .732 .665 .717 .813 .873 .331 .896 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .001 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .074 .000 N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 X4.2 Pearson Correlation .935 1 .864 .749 .740 .800 .796 .665 .864 .646 .665 .729 .767 .870 .934 .381 .899 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .038 .000 N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 X4.3 Pearson Correlation .935 .864 1 .749 .874 .800 .934 .800 .864 .766 .800 .729 .767 .870 .796 .381 .938 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .038 .000 N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 X4.4 Pearson Correlation .700 .749 .749 1 .655 .700 .802 .700 .749 .664 .554 .602 .625 .709 .653 .463 .801 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .001 .000 .000 .000 .000 .010 .000 N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 X4.5 Pearson Correlation .802 .740 .874 .655 1 .802 .816 .802 .874 .776 .802 .740 .793 .761 .680 .283 .887 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .130 .000 N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 X4.6 Pearson Correlation .866 .800 .800 .700 .802 1 .736 .732 .800 .590 .732 .665 .717 .675 .736 .331 .847 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .001 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .074 .000 N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 X4.7 Pearson Correlation .873 .796 .934 .802 .816 .736 1 .873 .796 .706 .736 .659 .697 .791 .722 .433 .897 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .017 .000 N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 X4.8 Pearson Correlation .732 .665 .800 .700 .802 .732 .873 1 .800 .829 .866 .800 .717 .675 .600 .472 .877 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .008 .000 N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 X4.9 Pearson Correlation .800 .864 .864 .749 .874 .800 .796 .800 1 .887 .800 .864 .890 .870 .796 .381 .948 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .038 .000 N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 X4.10 Pearson Correlation .590 .646 .766 .664 .776 .590 .706 .829 .887 1 .829 .887 .789 .772 .584 .464 .858 189 X4.1 X4.2 X4.3 X4.4 X4.5 X4.6 X4.7 X4.8 X4.9 X4.10 X4.11 X4.12 X4.13 X4.14 X4.15 X4.16 Total X4 Sig. 2-tailed .001 .000 .000 .000 .000 .001 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .001 .010 .000 N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 X4.11 Pearson Correlation .732 .665 .800 .554 .802 .732 .736 .866 .800 .829 1 .935 .839 .813 .736 .331 .886 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .000 .000 .001 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .074 .000 N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 X4.12 Pearson Correlation .665 .729 .729 .602 .740 .665 .659 .800 .864 .887 .935 1 .890 .870 .796 .381 .889 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .038 .000 N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 X4.13 Pearson Correlation .717 .767 .767 .625 .793 .717 .697 .717 .890 .789 .839 .890 1 .881 .821 .302 .889 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .105 .000 N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 X4.14 Pearson Correlation .813 .870 .870 .709 .761 .675 .791 .675 .870 .772 .813 .870 .881 1 .932 .342 .918 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .064 .000 N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 X4.15 Pearson Correlation .873 .934 .796 .653 .680 .736 .722 .600 .796 .584 .736 .796 .821 .932 1 .289 .867 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .001 .000 .000 .000 .000 .122 .000 N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 X4.16 Pearson Correlation .331 .381 .381 .463 .283 .331 .433 .472 .381 .464 .331 .381 .302 .342 .289 1 .473 Sig. 2-tailed .074 .038 .038 .010 .130 .074 .017 .008 .038 .010 .074 .038 .105 .064 .122 .008 N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 Efektifitas SPI Pearson Correlation .896 .899 .938 .801 .887 .847 .897 .877 .948 .858 .886 .889 .889 .918 .867 .473 1 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .008 N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 . Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level 2-tailed. . Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level 2-tailed.

Dokumen yang terkait

PENGARUH PENYAJIAN LAPORAN KEUANGAN DAERAH DAN AKSESIBILITAS LAPORAN KEUANGAN DAERAH TERHADAP AKUNTABILITAS KEUANGAN DAERAH PADA KABUPATEN PRINGSEWU

7 46 63

PENGARUH PENYAJIAN LAPORAN KEUANGAN DAERAH DAN AKSESIBILITAS LAPORAN KEUANGAN DAERAH TERHADAP AKUNTABILITAS PENGELOLAAN KEUANGAN DAERAH KABUPATEN KLATEN.

2 5 14

PENGARUH PENYAJIAN LAPORAN KEUANGAN DAERAH DAN AKSESIBILITAS LAPORAN KEUANGAN DAERAH TERHADAP PENGARUH PENYAJIAN LAPORAN KEUANGAN DAERAH DAN AKSESIBILITAS LAPORAN KEUANGAN DAERAH TERHADAP AKUNTABILITAS PENGELOLAAN KEUANGAN DAERAH KABUPATEN KLATEN.

3 8 14

PENDAHULUAN PENGARUH PENYAJIAN LAPORAN KEUANGAN DAERAH DAN AKSESIBILITAS LAPORAN KEUANGAN DAERAH TERHADAP AKUNTABILITAS PENGELOLAAN KEUANGAN DAERAH KABUPATEN KLATEN.

0 4 8

PENUTUP PENGARUH PENYAJIAN LAPORAN KEUANGAN DAERAH DAN AKSESIBILITAS LAPORAN KEUANGAN DAERAH TERHADAP AKUNTABILITAS PENGELOLAAN KEUANGAN DAERAH KABUPATEN KLATEN.

0 3 34

ANALISIS AKUNTABILITAS KINERJA KEUANGAN SATUAN KERJA PERANGKAT DAERAH KOTA SURAKARTA Analisis Akuntabilitas Kinerja Keuangan Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah Kota Surakarta.

0 6 22

PENGARUH PENYAJIAN LAPORAN KEUANGAN, AKSESIBILITAS LAPORAN KEUANGAN DAN PENYAJIAN NERACA TERHADAP AKUNTABILITAS PENGELOLAAN KEUANGAN DAERAH ( Studi Empiris Pada Pemerintah Kabupaten Kudus )

0 0 12

PENGARUH KOMPETENSI PENGELOLA KEUANGAN DAN AKUNTABILITAS TERHADAP KINERJA PENGELOLAAN KEUANGAN DAERAH (Studi pada Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah Pemerintah Kabupaten Aceh Utara)

1 2 8

PENGARUH KUALITAS PENYAJIAN LAPORAN KEUANGAN, SISTEM PENGENDALIAN INTERN PEMERINTAH DAN AKSESIBILITAS LAPORAN KEUANGAN TERHADAP AKUNTABILITAS KEUANGAN DAERAH (Studi Kasus Pada Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah Kota Pangkalpinang)

1 2 20

Pengaruh kualitas penyajian laporan keuangan, sistem pengendalian intern pemerintah dan aksesibilitas laporan keuangan terhadap akuntabilitas keuangan daerah (studi kasus pada Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah Kota Pangkalpinang) - Repository Universitas Bang

0 0 10