Legal case PERJANJIAN PENTING,

are in the Indonesian language. PT ELNUSA Tbk DAN ENTITAS ANAK CATATAN ATAS LAPORAN KEUANGAN KONSOLIDASIAN INTERIM Tanggal 30 Juni 2016 dan untuk Periode Enam Bulan yang Berakhir pada Tanggal Tersebut Disajikan dalam jutaan Rupiah, kecuali dinyatakan lain PT ELNUSA Tbk AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS As of June 30, 2016 and for the Six-month Period Then Ended Expressed in millions of Rupiah, unless otherwise stated 92

31. PERJANJIAN PENTING,

KOMITMEN DAN KONTINJENSI lanjutan 31. SIGNIFICANT AGREEMENTS, COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES continued a. Perkara hukum lanjutan

a. Legal case continued

PT Saptawell Tehnicatama PT Saptawell Tehnicatama Pada tanggal 15 September 2009, PT Saptawell Tehnicatama “Saptawell mengajukan gugatan perdata melalui Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan kepada Perusahaan berupa tuntutan ganti rugi atas penyewaan peralatan milik Saptawell yang diduga oleh Saptawell mengalami kerusakan setelah disewa oleh Perusahaan. Gugatan ini terdaftar dalam perkara No. 1458Pdt.G2009PN.Jkt.Sel. On September 15, 2009, PT Saptawell Tehnicatama “Saptawell” filed a civil lawsuit on with the South Jakarta District Court against the Company asking for compensation on the rental of tools owned by Saptawell which were alleged by Saptawell were damaged after being rented by the Company. The lawsuit was registered in case No. 1458Pdt.G2009PN.Jkt.Sel. Pada tanggal 5 Agustus 2010, Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan mengeluarkan putusan atas perkara tersebut yang isinya menyatakan gugatan Saptawell tidak dapat diterima. Atas putusan tersebut, pada tanggal 15 September 2010, Saptawell mengajukan Memori Banding kepada Pengadilan Tinggi DKI Jakarta. Pada tanggal 21 Januari 2011, Perusahaan menyampaikan Kontra Memori Banding kepada Pengadilan Tinggi DKI Jakarta. On August 5, 2010, the South Jakarta District Court issued the verdict to such case, the decision of which, stated that the lawsuit filed by Saptawell is not acceptable. Responding to the verdict, on September 15, 2010, Saptawell filed a Memorandum of Appeal to the Jakarta High Court. On January 21, 2011, the Company submitted its Counter-Memorandum of Appeal to the Jakarta High Court. Pada tanggal 27 Januari 2012, Pengadilan Tinggi DKI Jakarta mengeluarkan Putusan No. 07Pdt2011PT.DKI tertanggal 3 November 2011 yang isinya menguatkan putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan yang menyatakan gugatan Saptawell tidak dapat diterima. On January 27, 2012, the Jakarta High Court issued Verdict No. 07Pdt2011PT.DKI dated November 3, 2011, which affirmed the verdict issued by the South Jakarta District Court which stated that the lawsuit filed by Saptawell is not acceptable. Atas putusan banding tersebut, pada tanggal 9 Maret 2012, Saptawell mengajukan Memori Kasasi kepada MA. Pada tanggal 13 April 2012, Perusahaan menyampaikan Kontra Memori Kasasi kepada MA. Responding to the appeal verdict, on March 9, 2012, Saptawell filed a Memorandum of Cassation to the Supreme Court. On April 13, 2012, the Company submitted its Counter- Memorandum of Cassation to the Supreme Court. Pada tanggal 24 September 2014, Perusahaan menerima Surat Pemberitahuan Isi Putusan MA RI No. 1584 KPdt2013 tertanggal 8 Juli 2013 yang isinya mengabulkan permohonan kasasi Saptawell dan membatalkan putusan Pengadilan Tinggi DKI Jakarta yang menguatkan putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan. On September 24, 2014, the Company received the Supreme Court Verdict Notification Letter No. 1584 KPdt2013 dated July 8, 2013, which accepted the cassaction filed by Saptawell and revoked the verdict issued by the Jakarta High Court which reaffirmed the verdict issued by the South Jakarta District Court. are in the Indonesian language. PT ELNUSA Tbk DAN ENTITAS ANAK CATATAN ATAS LAPORAN KEUANGAN KONSOLIDASIAN INTERIM Tanggal 30 Juni 2016 dan untuk Periode Enam Bulan yang Berakhir pada Tanggal Tersebut Disajikan dalam jutaan Rupiah, kecuali dinyatakan lain PT ELNUSA Tbk AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS As of June 30, 2016 and for the Six-month Period Then Ended Expressed in millions of Rupiah, unless otherwise stated 93

31. PERJANJIAN PENTING,