Guideline for Implementing Green House Gas Emission Reduction Action Plan
21
by following the start-year and end-year similar to those in BAU baseline scenario development.
To develop the RAD-GRK, deinition of mitigation actions can be seen more clearly in Chapter 7 and the Guideline Book for Developing RAD-GRK.
In Perpes No. 61 year 2011, there is no deinition of mitigation actions for the achievement of -26 until -41 targets yet. Deinition of the actions will be
further discussed in Chapter 3.
3.1.3 Proposed Implementability Level and Mitigation Action Selection Process
As one of the parties at UNFCCC, Indonesia has re-conirmed that economic and social development as well as poverty alleviation constitute key and the
most important priorities from developing countries
6
because development countries still have to develop and meet economic and social growth and
development. Such provision becomes an important element that needs considering in establishing national mitigation actions.
Several testing criteria can be used to set rankings of potential mitigation action options proposed from each sector, namely:
i cost eficiency low cost to reach signiicant emission reduction ii maintain consistency related to national development goals;
iii maintain consistency related to national environmental goals; iv availability and quality of data;
v political and social feasibility; vi
replicability, namely adjustment capacity to geographical, socio- economic-cultural, legal and regulatory backgrounds; and
vii macro-economic considerations, such as impacts on PDB GDP,
number of job opportunities created and closed, implication on long-term development, sustainable economic growth and social development,
poverty alleviation, and foreign currency exchange value and trading, etc.
The testing criteria should be in line with the whole potential mitigation scenario framework proposed for each major and pertinent sector by using
a bottom-up approach. In addition to this guideline, existing technological diversity, national policy and legal and regulatory frameworks must also be
taken into consideration.
6
UNFCCC COP 16, Cancun, in Decision 1CP.16
Guideline for Implementing Green House Gas Emission Reduction Action Plan
22
Furthermore, GHG emission reduction cost abatement cost for each potential mitigation action is considered highly important. The agreed amount
of cost and criteria will determine priority levels of each mitigation action in the related sector and at the national scale.
Job Creation
Poverty Alleviation Social dan Economic
Development
Meeting National Emission Reduction Targets as Con- tribution to Integrated Global Mitigation Efforts
Figure 6.
Four Pillars in Establishing
Mitigation Actions for Each Sector.
Several testing criteria as proposed in Picture 6 are used to set the priority of potential mitigation actions proposed by each sector according to national
and sub-national situations. Meanwhile, the selection process is described in Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Scheme: Selection Process
of Proposed Potential
Mitigation Actions.
Proposed Potential Mitigation Actions
Cost Effectiveness
Implementability Level
Priority List
Potential Mitigation Actions
It should be understood that derivates from the proposed testing criteria may vary for each sector because the condition system within each sector
in the national and sub-national level situation may have their respective characteristics.
