Sel Darah Putih KESIMPULAN

The GLM Procedure Dependent Variable: SDP Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Value Pr F Model 29 89.53150820 3.08729339 45.63 .0001 Error 18 1.21789034 0.06766057 Corrected Total 47 90.74939854 R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE SDP Mean 0.986580 4.736422 0.260116 5.491835 Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr F t 3 19.88594754 6.62864918 97.97 .0001 rt 8 1.07775951 0.13471994 1.99 0.1073 W 3 49.80075622 16.60025207 245.35 .0001 rW 6 0.20701331 0.03450222 0.51 0.7930 tW 9 18.56003161 2.06222573 30.48 .0001 Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr F t 3 19.88594754 6.62864918 97.97 .0001 rt 6 0.56468205 0.09411367 1.39 0.2714 W 3 49.80075622 16.60025207 245.35 .0001 rW 6 0.20701331 0.03450222 0.51 0.7930 tW 9 18.56003161 2.06222573 30.48 .0001 Dapat dilihat bahwa interaksi antara perlakuan dan waktu berpengaruh nyata karena p-value 0.05 yaitu 0.0001. Oleh karena itu, perlu dilakukan uji lanjut untuk mengetahui interaksi mana saja yang berbeda nyata memperikan pengaruh yang berbeda terhadap respon. Tests of Hypotheses Using the Type III MS for rt as an Error Term Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr F t 3 19.88594754 6.62864918 70.43 .0001 Tests of Hypotheses Using the Type III MS for rW as an Error Term Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr F W 3 49.80075622 16.60025207 481.14 .0001 Duncans Multiple Range Test for SDP Alpha 0.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 6 Error Mean Square 0.094114 Number of Means 2 3 4 Critical Range .3065 .3176 .3231 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. Duncan Grouping Mean N T A 6.3770 12 PC B 5.8348 12 PO C 4.9076 12 KP C C 4.8479 12 KN Duncans Multiple Range Test for SDP Alpha 0.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 6 Error Mean Square 0.034502 Number of Means 2 3 4 Critical Range .1856 .1923 .1957 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. Duncan Grouping Mean N W A 6.44348 12 H12 B 5.96968 12 H10 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. Duncan Grouping Mean N W C 5.77569 12 H16 D 3.77850 12 H8 Hasil Analisis RAL interaksi SDP The GLM Procedure Class Level Information Class Levels Values interaksi 16 KNH10 KNH12 KNH16 KNH8 KPH10 KPH12 KPH16 KPH8 PCH10 PCH12 PCH16 PCH8 POH10 POH12 POH16 POH8 r 3 1 2 3 Number of Observations Read 48 Number of Observations Used 48 Dependent Variable: respon Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Value Pr F Model 15 88.24673537 5.88311569 75.22 .0001 Error 32 2.50266317 0.07820822 Corrected Total 47 90.74939854 R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE respon Mean 0.972422 5.092239 0.279657 5.491835 Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr F interaksi 15 88.24673537 5.88311569 75.22 .0001 Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr F interaksi 15 88.24673537 5.88311569 75.22 .0001 Duncans Multiple Range Test for respon Alpha 0.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 32 Error Mean Square 0.078208 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. Duncan Grouping Mean N interaksi A 8.3637 3 PCH12 B 7.4406 3 PCH10 B B 7.2142 3 POH12 C 6.2920 3 POH16 C D C 5.9987 3 KPH16 D C D C 5.9813 3 PCH16 D C D C 5.9675 3 POH10 D D 5.6847 3 KNH10 E 5.1260 3 KPH12 E E 5.0701 3 KNH12 E E 4.8308 3 KNH16 E E 4.7859 3 KPH10 F 3.8656 3 POH8 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. Duncan Grouping Mean N interaksi F F 3.8060 3 KNH8 F F 3.7226 3 PCH8 F F 3.7198 3 KPH8 Indeks huruf yang berbeda menunjukkan bahwa perlakuan berbeda nyata. Sebagai contoh, interaksi KPH8 berbeda nyata dengan KPH10.

6.3. Sel Darah Merah

Perlakuan Total SDM Ulangan H0 H10 H12 H16 Kontrol negatif 1 4.57 3.02 3.63 3.77 2 3.89 2.91 3.69 3.59 3 4.18 2.94 3.13 3.84 Kontrol Positif 1 3.80 2.56 2.86 3.06 2 4.00 2.72 2.76 2.97 3 4.25 2.76 3.14 3.12 Pengobatan 1 4.04 2.84 3.17 3.44 2 3.98 2.82 2.88 3.13 3 3.95 2.74 2.95 3.02 Pencegahan 1 3.90 2.87 3.58 3.64 2 4.06 2.99 3.22 3.36 3 4.22 2.77 3.60 3.73 Perlakuan Nilai Rataan STDEV H0 H10 H12 H16 H0 H10 H12 H16 KN 4.21 2.96 3.48 3.73 0.3412 0.0569 0.0569 0.1290 KP 4.02 2.68 2.92 3.05 0.2255 0.1058 0.1970 0.0755 PO 3.99 2.80 3.00 3.20 0.0458 0.0529 0.1513 0.2178 PC 4.06 2.88 3.47 3.58 0.1600 0.1102 0.2139 0.1930 Hasil Analisis RAL In TIME SDM The GLM Procedure Class Level Information Class Levels Values Class Level Information Class Levels Values T 4 KN KP PC PO W 4 H10 H12 H16 H8 R 3 1 2 3 Number of Observations Read 48 Number of Observations Used 48 Dependent Variable: SDM Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Value Pr F Model 29 12.17009583 0.41965848 14.63 .0001 Error 18 0.51622917 0.02867940 Corrected Total 47 12.68632500 R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE SDM Mean 0.959308 5.015918 0.169350 3.376250 Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr F T 3 1.48082500 0.49360833 17.21 .0001 rt 8 0.43400000 0.05425000 1.89 0.1246 W 3 9.68244167 3.22748056 112.54 .0001 rW 6 0.11637083 0.01939514 0.68 0.6705 tW 9 0.45645833 0.05071759 1.77 0.1450 Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr F T 3 1.48082500 0.49360833 17.21 .0001 rt 6 0.32538750 0.05423125 1.89 0.1377 W 3 9.68244167 3.22748056 112.54 .0001 rW 6 0.11637083 0.01939514 0.68 0.6705 tW 9 0.45645833 0.05071759 1.77 0.1450 Dapat dilihat bahwa interaksi antara perlakuan dan waktu tidak berpengaruh nyata karena p-value 0.05 yaitu 0.145 . Perlakuan berpengaruh nyata terhadap respon karena p-value 0.05 yaitu p-value 0.0001. Oleh karena itu, pengaruh dari perlakuan dapat diidentifikasi. Untuk itu, perlu dilakukan uji lanjut untuk melihat perlakuan mana saja yang berbeda nyata memperikan pengaruh yang berbeda terhadap respon.