PT XL AXIATA Tbk DAN ENTITAS ANAK AND SUBSIDIARIES
Halaman 80 Page CATATAN ATAS LAPORAN KEUANGAN
KONSOLIDASIAN INTERIM YANG TIDAK DIAUDIT UNTUK PERIODE TIGA BULAN YANG BERAKHIR
31 MARET 2016 DAN 2015 Dinyatakan dalam jutaan Rupiah,
kecuali dinyatakan lain NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED INTERIM
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE-MONTH PERIODS ENDED
31 MARCH 2016 AND 2015
Expressed in millions of Rupiah,
unless otherwise stated 28.  PERPAJAKAN lanjutan
28.  TAXATION continued e.  Surat ketetapan pajak lanjutan
e.  Tax assessments continued Perseroan lanjutan
The Company continued Tahun pajak 2006
2006 fiscal year
Pada  bulan  September  2008,  Perseroan menerima  SKPKB  atas  beberapa  obyek  pajak
penghasilan,  PPN  dan  denda  pajak  dengan jumlah  Rp  157.876.  Pada  bulan  Desember
2008,
Perseroan membayar
kekurangan pembayaran
pajak tersebut.
Perseroan membebankan Rp 155.871 dalam laporan laba
rugi konsolidasian tahun 2008 dan mengajukan keberatan  kepada  DJP  atas  SKP  PPh  Pasal
23, SKP PPh Pasal 26 dan SKP PPN. In  September  2008,  the  Company  received  tax
assessment letters confirming the underpayment of  various  income  taxes,  VAT  and  tax  penalties
totalling  to  Rp  157,876.  In  December  2008,  the Company  paid  the  underpayment  of  these
income
taxes. The
Company recorded
Rp 155,871 in the 2008 consolidated statements of profit or loss, and  filed the objection letters to
DGT  regarding  income  tax  Article  23,  Article  26 and VAT.
Pada  bulan  Desember  2009,  DJP  menolak keberatan  Perseroan  atas  SKP  PPh  23  dan
menerima  sebagian  keberatan  atas  SKP  PPh 26  dan  PPN.  Perseroan  mencatat  hasil
keputusan
ini pada
laporan laba
rugi konsolidasian  Perseroan  tahun  2010  setelah
memperhitungkan  saldo  klaim  restitusi  pajak sebesar  Rp  1.221.  Pada  bulan  Maret  2010,
Perseroan  mengajukan  permohonan  banding ke Pengadilan Pajak atas keputusan keberatan
PPh  Pasal  26  dan  PPN.  Pada  bulan  Oktober 2014,  Pengadilan  Pajak  menolak  permohonan
banding  Perseroan  atas  obyek  PPN.  Pada bulan Maret 2015, Pengadilan Pajak menerima
seluruh  permohonan  banding  Perseroan  atas keputusan
keberatan PPh
26 sebesar
Rp  104.686.  Perseroan  telah  menerima pengembalian  pajak  tersebut  pada  tanggal
5 Juni 2015. In  December  2009,  DGT  rejected  the  objection
over income tax Article 23 and partially accepted the  objection  over  income  tax  Article  26  and
VAT.  The  Company  recorded  the  results  in  the 2010  consolidated  statements  of  profit  or  loss
taking  into  account  the  restitution  claim  of Rp  1,221.  In  March  2010,  the  Company
submitted  an  appeal  to  Tax  Court  in  relation  to income tax Article 26 and VAT. In October 2014,
the  Tax  Court  rejected  the  appeal  in  relation  to VAT. In March 2015, the Tax Court accepted all
the
Company’s  appeal  of  income  tax  Article  26 for an amount of Rp 104,686. The Company has
received the tax refund on 5 June 2015.
Pada  bulan  Januari  2016,  DJP  membatalkan Surat  Tagihan  Pajak  STP  atas  PPh  pasal 26
untuk  periode  Januari –  Desember  2006
sejumlah Rp
11.999. Perseroan
telah menerima  pengembalian  pajak  tersebut  pada
bulan Maret 2016. In  January  2016,  DGT  cancelled  Tax  Collection
Letters  STP  for  income  tax  Article  26  for January
–  December  2006  period  totalling Rp  11,999.  Company  has  received  the  tax
refund in March 2016.
PT XL AXIATA Tbk DAN ENTITAS ANAK AND SUBSIDIARIES
Halaman 81 Page CATATAN ATAS LAPORAN KEUANGAN
KONSOLIDASIAN INTERIM YANG TIDAK DIAUDIT UNTUK PERIODE TIGA BULAN YANG BERAKHIR
31 MARET 2016 DAN 2015 Dinyatakan dalam jutaan Rupiah,
kecuali dinyatakan lain NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED INTERIM
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE-MONTH PERIODS ENDED
31 MARCH 2016 AND 2015
Expressed in millions of Rupiah,
unless otherwise stated 28.  PERPAJAKAN lanjutan
28.  TAXATION continued e.  Surat ketetapan pajak lanjutan
e.  Tax assessments continued Perseroan lanjutan
The Company continued Tahun pajak 2007
2007 fiscal year
Pada  tahun  2009,  Perseroan  menerima SKPKB  atas  PPN,  PPh  Badan,  PPh  Pasal  23
dan  PPh  Pasal  26  dimana  Perseroan mengajukan  permohonan  keberatan  kepada
DJP atas SKPKB tersebut. Perseroan melunasi seluruh  SKPKB  sejumlah  Rp  103.447  dan
mencatat  jumlah  tersebut  pada  laporan  laba rugi konsolidasian Perseroan tahun 2009.
In 2009, the Company received tax assessment letters  confirming  underpayment  of  VAT,
corporate income tax, income tax Article 23 and income  tax  Article  26  of  which  the  Company
filed  objection  letters  to  DGT  against  these  tax assessments.
The Company
paid underpayment of these income tax amounted to
Rp  103,447  and  recorded  it  in  the  2009 consolidated statements of profit or loss.
Pada  tahun  2010,  DJP  menolak  keberatan Perseroan  atas  SKPKB  PPh  Pasal  26  dan
menambah  kurang  bayar  PPh  Pasal  26 menjadi  sebesar  Rp  80.145.  Perseroan  telah
membayar jumlah tersebut dan membebankan dalam  laporan  laba  rugi  konsolidasian  tahun
2010.
Perseroan kemudian
mengajukan banding  kepada  Pengadilan  Pajak  atas
keputusan  keberatan  PPh  Pasal  26,  dan  di bulan Maret 2013, Pengadilan Pajak menerima
sebagian  permohonan  banding  Perseroan sebesar  Rp  17.325.  Pada  bulan  Juni  2013,
DJP  mengajukan  permohonan  peninjauan kembali  ke  MA  atas  keputusan  Pengadilan
Pajak  tersebut.  Sampai  dengan  tanggal penyelesaian  laporan  keuangan  konsolidasian
interim,  MA  belum  memberikan  putusan  atas permohonan peninjauan kembali yang diajukan
DJP tersebut. In  2010,  DGT  rejected  the  objection  regarding
income  tax  Article  26  and  increased  the underpayment  of  income  tax  Article  26  to
become  Rp  80,145.  The  Company  paid  the underpayment  and  charged  it  to  the  2010
consolidated  statements  of  profit  or  loss.  The Company then submitted an appeal letter to the
Tax  Court  for  the  objection  result  of  income taxes  Article  26,  and  in  March  2013,  the  Tax
Court  par
tially  accepted  the  Company’s  appeal for an amount of Rp 17,325. In June 2013, DGT
has  submitted  a  judicial  review  to  the  SC regarding  the  Tax  Court’s  decision.  Up  to  the
date  of  the  completion  of  these  interim consolidated  financial  statements,  the  SC  has
has not issued its decision on the judicial review requested by DGT.
Pada tahun 2010, DJP juga menolak keberatan Perseroan atas SKPKB PPh Badan, PPh Pasal
23 dan PPN. Perseroan kemudian mengajukan permohonan banding ke Pengadilan Pajak atas
keputusan keberatan tersebut. Pada bulan Juli 2013,  Pengadilan  Pajak  menolak  permohonan
banding  Perseroan  atas  keputusan  keberatan PPN  sebesar  Rp  30.371.  Perseroan  setuju
dengan keputusan tersebut. Pada tanggal yang sama,
Pengadilan Pajak
mengabulkan sebagian  permohonan  banding  Perseroan
terkait  dengan  kurang  bayar  PPh  23  sebesar Rp  1.898  dari  keseluruhan  jumlah  klaim
Perseroan sebesar Rp 2.037. Perseroan setuju dengan  keputusan  tersebut.  Pada  bulan
Januari  2014,  DJP  mengajukan  permohonan peninjauan  kembali  ke  MA  atas  keputusan
Pengadilan  Pajak  untuk  PPh  23.  Sampai dengan
tanggal penyelesaian
laporan keuangan  konsolidasian  interim,  MA  belum
memberikan putusan
atas permohonan
peninjauan  kembali  yang  diajukan  DJP tersebut.
In  2010,  DGT  also  rejected  the  Company’s objection  regarding  corporate  income  tax,
income  tax  Article  23  and  VAT.  The  Company then submitted an appeal letter to the Tax Court
regarding the objection results. In July 2013, the
Tax  Court  rejected  the  Company’s  appeal relating  to  VAT  amounting  to  Rp  30,371.  The
Company  agreed  with  the  decision.  The  Tax Court  also  partially  accepted  the  Company’s
appeal  relating  to  underpayment  of  income  tax Article  23  amounting  to  Rp  1,898  of  the  total
amount  claimed  by  the  Company  of  Rp  2,037. The  Company  agreed  with  the  decision.  In
January  2014,  DGT  submitted  a  judicial  review
to the SC regarding the Tax Court’s decision on Article  23.  Up  to  the  date  of  the  completion  of
these  interim consolidated financial statements, the  SC  has  has  not  issued  its  decision  on  the
judicial review requested by DGT.