The Review from Content Experts
of the target words in Task 3 and Task 4 should be changed into animated pictures. The words “the desired” in instruction of Task 7 should be changed into
“the correct”. The words “of the words” on the instruction of Task 8 should be omitted. Below is Table 4.12 that shows the result of the evaluation of Unit 2
from the content expert.
Table 4.12. The Evaluation of Unit 2 from the Language Expert
Unit Task
Evaluation Revision
Unit 2
Overview On the instruction, “that included” should be replaced
with “that are included”. revising the instruction
Task 1 – Task 11
There is not any example available.
adding an example in each task in all units
Task 3 The pictures should be
replaced by animated picture. replacing the picture with
animated picture Task 4
The pictures should be replaced by animated picture.
replacing the picture with animated picture
Task 7 On the instruction, “the
desired” should be replaced with “the correct”.
revising the instruction
Task 8 On the instruction, “of the
words” should be omitted. revising the instruction
The subject expert suggested changing the meaning of “excite” and “gap”. Below is the result of the evaluation from the content experts which is
shown in Table 4.13.
Table 4.13. The Evaluation of Unit 2 from the Subject Expert
Unit Task
Evaluation Revision
Unit 2
Task 1, Task 2,
Task 9 Dictionary
The meaning of “excite” was inappropriate.
revising the meaning
Task 1, Task 2,
Task 9 Dictionary
The meaning of “gap” was inappropriate.
revising the meaning
The validation showed that Unit 2 was appropriate. This was supported by the mean values
�̅ in Table 4.14 and Table 4.15. The smallest mean was 4 while the biggest was 5. According to Sudjono 2003:335, the mean value
�̅ of 3.4
�̅ ≤ 4.2 is categorized as ‘Good’, and �̅ 4.20 is categorized as ‘Very Good’. The tables below explain the descriptive statistics of Unit 2.
Table 4.14. The Descriptive Statistic of the Language Expert Validation on the
Appropriateness of Unit 2
No. Element
n Mean
�̅ Explanation The Appropriateness of the Content
1. The Appropriateness with Syllabus
15 5
Very Good 2.
The Materials Supporting the Learning 13 4.3
Very Good
The Appropriateness of the Language
3. The Appropriateness with the Level of
Students’ Development 15
5 Very Good
4. Communicative
5 5
Very Good 5.
Accuracy 10
5 Very Good
6. Cohesive and Coherence
10 5
Very Good
The Appropriateness of the Presentation
7. Technique of Presentation
20 5
Very Good 8.
Learning Presentation 40
5 Very Good
Table 4.15. The Descriptive Statistic of the Subject Expert Validation on the
Appropriateness of Unit 2
No. Element
N Mean
�̅ Explanation
1. The Appropriateness with Syllabus
14 4.7
Very Good 2.
The Appropriateness of the Concept 12
4 Good
3. The Appropriateness of the Word
Choice 12
4 Good
3 Evaluation and Validation of Unit 3
The judgment of the language expert toward Unit 3 resulted in some parts that should be revised. On the instruction in overview there were words “that
included” which should be replaced by “that are included”. To help the users do the task, an example of how to do the task also should be added in all tasks.
Representations of the target words in Task 3 and Task 4 should be changed into animated pictures. Instruction of Task 7 that include the words “the desired”
should be changed into “the correct”. The words “of the words” on the instruction of Task 8 should be omitted. Below is Table 4.16 that shows the result of the
evaluation of Unit 2 from the content expert. Table 4.16.
The Evaluation of Unit 3 from the Language Expert
Unit Task
Evaluation Revision
Unit 3
Overview On the instruction, “that included” should be replaced
with “that are included”. revising the instruction
Task 1 – 11
There is not any example available.
adding an example in each task in all units
Task 3 The pictures should be
replaced by animated picture. replacing the picture with
animated picture Task 4
The pictures should be replaced by animated picture.
replacing the picture with animated picture
Task 7 On the instruction, “the
desired” should be replaced with “the correct”.
revising the instruction
Task 8 On the instruction, “of the
words” should be omitted. revising the instruction
A suggestion from the subject expert has been done by changing the meaning of “recoil”. Below is the result of the evaluation from the content experts
which is shown in Table 4.17. Table 4.17.
The Evaluation of Unit 3 from the Subject Expert
Unit Task
Evaluation Revision
Unit 3
Task 1, Task 2,
Task 9 The meaning of “recoil” was
inappropriate. revising the meaning
Content experts believed that Unit 3 was appropriate. It was supported by the mean values
�̅ in Table 4.18 and Table 4.19. The smallest mean was 4 while the biggest was 5. According to Sudjono 2003:335, the mean value
�̅ of 3.4
�̅ ≤ 4.2 is categorized as ‘Good’, and �̅ 4.20 is categorized as ‘Very Good’. Below are the tables explain the descriptive statistics of Unit 3.
Table 4.18. The Descriptive Statistic of the Language Expert Validation on the
Appropriateness of Unit 3
No. Element
N Mean
�̅ Explanation The Appropriateness of the Content
1. The Appropriateness with Syllabus
15 5
Very Good 2.
The Materials Supporting the Learning 15 5
Very Good
The Appropriateness of the Language
3. The Appropriateness with the Level of
Students’ Development 14
4.7 Very Good
4. Communicative
4 4
5. Accuracy
8 4
Good 6.
Cohesive and Coherence 8
4 Good
The Appropriateness of the Presentation
7. Technique of Presentation
20 5
Very Good 8.
Learning Presentation 40
5 Very Good
Table 4.19.
The Descriptive Statistic of the Subject Expert Validation on the Appropriateness of Unit 3
No. Element
n Mean
�̅ Explanation
1. The Appropriateness with Syllabus
14 4.7
Very Good 2.
The Appropriateness of the Concept 12
4 Good
3. The Appropriateness of the Word
Choice 13
4.3 Very Good
4
Evaluation and Validation of Unit 4
The language expert judgment of Unit 4 suggested that some parts need revisions. The overview’s instruction contained the words “that included” that
should be replaced by “that are included”. In all tasks, there is an example of how to do it that added. Pictures in Task 3 and Task 4 should be changed into animated
pictures. The words “the desired” in instruction of Task 7 should be changed into “the correct”. The words “of the words” on the instruction of Task 8 should be
omitted. Table 4.20 below shows the result of the evaluation of Unit 4 from the content expert.
Table 4.20. The Evaluation of Unit 4 from the Language Expert
Unit Task
Evaluation Revision
Unit 4
Overview On the instruction, “that included” should be replaced
with “that are included”. revising the instruction
Task 1 – Task 11
There is not any example available.
adding an example in each task in all units
Task 3 The pictures should be
replaced by animated picture. replacing the picture with
animated picture Task 4
The pictures should be replaced by animated picture.
replacing the picture with animated picture
Task 7 On the instruction, “the
desired” should be replaced with “the correct”.
revising the instruction
Task 8 On the instruction, “of the
words” should be omitted. revising the instruction
There is only one suggestion from the subject expert which is changing the meaning of “recoil”. The result of the evaluation from the content experts is
shown in Table 4.21. below. Table 4.21.
The Evaluation of Unit 4 from the Subject Expert
Unit Task
Evaluation Revision
Unit 4
Task 1, Task 2,
Task 9 The meaning of “sphere” was
inappropriate. revising the meaning
Unit 4 was considered as appropriate by the content experts. This was supported by the mean values
�̅ in Table 4.22 and Table 4.23. The smallest mean was 4 while the biggest was 5 According to Sudjono 2003:335, the mean
value �̅ of 3.4 �̅ ≤ 4.2 is categorized as ‘Good’, and �̅ 4.20 is categorized
as ‘Very Good’. The following tables explain the descriptive statistics of Unit 4.
Table 4.22. The Descriptive Statistic of the Language Expert Validation on the
Appropriateness of Unit 4
No. Element
n Mean
�̅ Explanation The Appropriateness of the Content
1. The Appropriateness with Syllabus
15 5
Very Good 2.
The Materials Supporting the Learning 12 4
Good
The Appropriateness of the Language
3. The Appropriateness with the Level of
Students’ Development 15
5 Very Good
4. Communicative
5 5
Very Good 5.
Accuracy 10
5 Very Good
6. Cohesive and Coherence
8 4
Good
The Appropriateness of the Presentation
7. Technique of Presentation
20 5
Very Good 8.
Learning Presentation 40
5 Very Good
Table 4.23. The Descriptive Statistic of the Subject Expert Validation on the
Appropriateness of Unit 4
No. Element
n Mean
�̅ Explanation
1. The Appropriateness with Syllabus
14 4.7
Very Good 2.
The Appropriateness of the Concept 12
4 Good
3. The Appropriateness of the Word
Choice 13
4.3 Very Good