Summary Dictionary The First Draft of the Interactive Multimedia

The content experts agreed that Unit 1 was appropriate. It was proven by the mean values �̅ in Table 4.10 and Table 4.11. The smallest mean was 4 while the biggest was 5 According to Sudjono 2003:335, the mean value �̅ of 3.4 � � ≤ 4.2 is categorized as ‘Good’, and �̅ 4.20 is categorized as ‘Very Good’. The tables below explain the descriptive statistics of Unit 1. Table 4.10. The Descriptive Statistic of the Language Expert Validation on the Appropriateness of Unit 1 No. Element n Mean �̅ Category The Appropriateness of the Content 1. The Appropriateness with Syllabus 15 5 Very Good 2. The Materials Supporting the Learning 14 4.7 Very Good The Appropriateness of the Language 3. The Appropriateness with the Level of Students’ Development 12 4 Good 4. Communicative 5 5 Very Good 5. Accuracy 8 4 Good 6. Cohesive and Coherence 8 4 Good The Appropriateness of the Presentation 7. Technique of Presentation 20 5 Very Good 8. Learning Presentation 37 4.6 Very Good Table 4.11. The Descriptive Statistic of the Subject Expert Validation on the Appropriateness of Unit 1 No. Element n Mean �̅ Explanation 1. The Appropriateness with Syllabus 14 4.7 Very Good 2. The Appropriateness of the Concept 12 4 Good 3. The Appropriateness of the Word Choice 12 4 Good 2 Evaluation and Validation of Unit 2 The language expert judgment of Unit 2 suggested some revisions in similar parts of Unit 1. The words “that included” in the instruction in overview should be replaced by “that are included”. To help the users do the thask, an example of how to do the task also should be added in all tasks. Representations of the target words in Task 3 and Task 4 should be changed into animated pictures. The words “the desired” in instruction of Task 7 should be changed into “the correct”. The words “of the words” on the instruction of Task 8 should be omitted. Below is Table 4.12 that shows the result of the evaluation of Unit 2 from the content expert. Table 4.12. The Evaluation of Unit 2 from the Language Expert Unit Task Evaluation Revision Unit 2 Overview On the instruction, “that included” should be replaced with “that are included”. revising the instruction Task 1 – Task 11 There is not any example available. adding an example in each task in all units Task 3 The pictures should be replaced by animated picture. replacing the picture with animated picture Task 4 The pictures should be replaced by animated picture. replacing the picture with animated picture Task 7 On the instruction, “the desired” should be replaced with “the correct”. revising the instruction Task 8 On the instruction, “of the words” should be omitted. revising the instruction The subject expert suggested changing the meaning of “excite” and “gap”. Below is the result of the evaluation from the content experts which is shown in Table 4.13. Table 4.13. The Evaluation of Unit 2 from the Subject Expert Unit Task Evaluation Revision Unit 2 Task 1, Task 2, Task 9 Dictionary The meaning of “excite” was inappropriate. revising the meaning Task 1, Task 2, Task 9 Dictionary The meaning of “gap” was inappropriate. revising the meaning