19. The settings the unit title, sub-title, illustration, page
number, and picture explanation are proportional. 4
20. The illustrations and the graphics in developed
materials are aesthetic and functional. 4
21. The developed materials do not use too many types
of fonts. 4
22. The designs are totally interesting.
4
2 The Review of Unit 2
Most of the scores are very good, however, there were some parts which had weakness and needed revision. The weaknesses were the inappropriate
use of grammar, inappropriate instruction, and the inappropriate use of punctuation.
3 The Revision of Unit 2
Based on the result of expert judgement analysis and suggestions from the evaluator or the expert, there are some parts of the unit has to be revised.
The following table shows the points of revisions of Unit 2 and their revisions.
Table 4.37: The Revision of Unit 2 Parts of
the Unit Points to Revise
Revision
Task 1 The sentence
A woman comes to a garage to fix her motorcycle.
should be changed. Changing the sentence into
A woman comes to a garage to
have her motorcycle fixed.
Task 2 No revision
No revision Task 3
No revision No revision
Task 4 No revision
No revision Task 5
No revision No revision
Task 6 In the dialogue number 3, the
sentence
I think you need to repaint it.
should be changed. Changing the sentence into
I think you should have it
repainted.
Task 7 No revision
No revision
continued
continued
Task 8 No revision
No revision Task 9
No revision No revision
Task 10 No revision
No revision Task 11
The sentence
Then, practice it with
your friend
. in
the instruction should be changed.
The exclamation
mark in
sentence
Look
should be
changed Changing the sentence into
Then, act it out with your friend.
Changing the exclamation mark into a full stop .
Task 12 No revision
No revision Task 13
The sentence
It will be take place in
Garage 2 … should be changed.
Changing the sentence into
It
will take place in Garage 2… Task 14
The sentence
When will it hold, sir?
should be changed Changing the sentence into
When will it be held, sir?
Task 15 No revision
No revision Task 16
No revision No revision
4 Validation of Unit 2
Based on the result of the component analysis above, the developed materials are validated as shown by the following table.
Table 4.38: The Validation of Unit 2 No
Aspects n
Mean Description
1. Content Appropriateness
7 3.71
Very Good 2.
Language Appropriateness 6
3.5 Very Good
3. Presentation Appropriateness
4 3.75
Very Good 4.
Layout Appropriateness 5
4 Very Good
The table 4.38 shows that the appropriateness of the content is categorised as
Very Good
with the mean score of 3.71. Besides, in terms of the appropriateness of the language, it reaches the mean score of 3.5 and is
categorised as
Very Good
. The presentation and layout appropriateness are also categorised as
Very Good
with the mean scores of 3.75 and 4.
continued
c. The Results of Expert Judgement and Revision of Unit 3
1 The Result of Expert Judgement
a. Content Appropriateness
The first aspect to evaluate the developed materials in Unit 3 was the appropriateness of the content. The following table shows the results of the
expert judgement analysis related to the content appropriateness.
Table 4.39: The Content Appropriateness of Unit 3
No. Item
Score 1.
The developed materials are in accordance with the aims.
4 2.
The developed materials are in accordance with the standard competence and basic competence of
English lesson in Vocational High School including the four skills.
4
3. The topic of the unit is relevant with their study
programme and their work life. 4
4. The texts in the developed materials are relevant with
their study programme and their work life. 4
5. The developed materials are in accordance with the
course grid. 4
6. The materials are taken from the relevant and latest
sources in accordance with the topic discussed. 3
7. The developed materials encourage students to
develop the personal, social, academic, and vocational skills.
3
b. Language Appropriateness
The second aspect to evaluate the materials was the appropriateness of the language. The result of the expert judgement analysis related to the
language appropriateness is shown in the table below.
Table 4.40: The Language Appropriateness of Unit 3
No. Item
Score 8.
The language used in the instructions and explanations is relevant with the level of students’
cognitive development. 4
9. The language used in the developed materials is clear
and understandable. 4
10. The language used in the developed materials
consistently uses one style of English. 3
11. The developed materials use the appropriate English
grammar. 3
12. The developed materials use the appropriate English
spelling. 3
13. The developed materials are cohesion and coherence.
4
d. Presentation Appropriateness
The next aspect to evaluate the materials was the appropriateness of the presentation. The following table shows the result of the expert judgement
analysis related to the appropriateness of the presentation of Unit 3.
Table 4.41: The Presentation Appropriateness of Unit 3
No. Item
Score 14.
The developed
materials are
developed systematically in accordance with the steps of the
characteristic of materials: preface, contents, and closing.
4
15. The developed materials are presented step by step
from guided activities, group activities, and individual activities.
4
16. The developed encourage motivate students to
interact with other students, the teacher, and other people.
4
17. The developed materials improve the students’ ability
on self-reflection and evaluation. 3
e. Layout Appropriateness
The last aspect to evaluate the materials was the appropriateness of the layout. The table below shows the result of the expert judgement analysis
related to the layout appropriateness.
Table 4.42: The Layout Appropriateness of Unit 3
No. Item
Score 18.
The developed materials are printed using the ISO standard paper size A4, A5, B5.
4 19.
The settings the unit title, sub-title, illustration, page number, and picture explanation are proportional.
4 20.
The illustrations and the graphics in developed materials are aesthetic and functional.
4 21.
The developed materials do not use too many types of fonts.
4 22.
The designs are totally interesting. 4
2 The Review of Unit 3
Most score in four aspects of appropriateness are very good, although some parts in Unit 3 have weaknesses and need to be revised. The weaknesses
deal the grammar and the punctuation.
3 The Revision of Unit 3
Based on the result of expert judgement analysis and suggestions from the evaluator or the expert, there are some parts of the unit has to be revised.
The following table shows the points of revisions of Unit 3 and their revisions.
Table 4.43: The Revision of Unit 3 Parts of
the Unit Points to Revise
Revision
Task 1 No revision
No revision
continued
Task 2 The preposition
in
in the sentences
Arriving in
Banyuwangi
and
Arriving in Yogyakarta
should be changed Changing the sentences into
Arriving at Banyuwangi
and
Arriving at Yogyakarta
Task 3 No revision
No revision Task 4
No revision No revision
Task 5 The sentence
Can you tell me how many flights to Jakarta for
Sunday?
should be added with verb.
Changing the sentence into
Can you tell me how many flights depart for Jakarta on
Sunday?
Task 6 The sentences
MZ 218 will be daparture on time at 08.12 a.m.
and
It is departure at 12.35 p.m.
should be changed. Changing the sentences into
MZ 218 will depart on time at 08.12 a.m.
and
It departs at 12.35 p.m.
Task 7 The preposition
in
in the sentences
Arriving in
Banyuwangi
and
Arriving in Yogyakarta
should be changed Changing the sentences into
Arriving at Banyuwangi
and
Arriving at Yogyakarta
Task 8 The preposition
in
in the sentences
Arriving in Malang
and
Arriving in Jakarta
should be changed
Changing the sentences into
Arriving at
Malang
and
Arriving at Jakarta
Task 9 In question number 3, the
sentence
How many available flights from Jakarta to Malang?
should be changed because there is no verb in it.
In question number 6, the preposition in in the sentence
What time will Mr Hermawan arrive in Malang?
should be changed.
Changing the sentences into
How many available flights depart
from Jakarta
to Malang?
and
What time will Mr Hermawan arrive
at Malang?
Task 10 No revision
No revision Task 11
The sentence
Then, practice it with
your friend
. in
the instruction should be changed.
Changing the sentence into
Then, act it out with your friend
. Task 12
The preposition
in
in the explanation is not appropriate,
so it should be changed. Changing the preposition
in
into
at
Task 13 No revision
No revision Task 14
The sentence …will it be
departure as schedules
? should Changing the sentence into
…will it depart as schedule?
continued
continued
