127
7. Kinerja Petugas
Method 1 space saver will be used for this analysis R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E A L P H A
Mean Std Dev Cases 1. KINERJA1 2.5500 1.0501 20.0
2. KINERJA2 2.5000 1.0000 20.0 3. KINERJA3 2.6500 1.0400 20.0
4. KINERJA4 2.6500 .9881 20.0 5. KINERJA5 2.7000 .9787 20.0
6. KINERJA6 2.7500 .9105 20.0 7. KINERJA7 2.8000 .9515 20.0
8. KINERJA8 2.7500 .9105 20.0 9. KINERJA9 2.9000 .9679 20.0
10. KINERJA0 2.6000 .9403 20.0 N of
Statistics for Mean Variance Std Dev Variables SCALE 26.8500 77.8184 8.8215 10
Item-total Statistics Scale Scale Corrected
Mean Variance Item- Alpha if Item if Item Total if Item
Deleted Deleted Correlation Deleted KINERJA1 24.3000 62.8526 .8326 .9746
KINERJA2 24.3500 65.9237 .6709 .9799 KINERJA3 24.2000 61.5368 .9316 .9710
KINERJA4 24.2000 62.9053 .8892 .9725 KINERJA5 24.1500 62.1342 .9544 .9703
KINERJA6 24.1000 63.4632 .9324 .9712 KINERJA7 24.0500 62.7868 .9369 .9710
KINERJA8 24.1000 62.7263 .9890 .9694 KINERJA9 23.9500 64.2605 .8133 .9750
Reliability Coefficients N of Cases = 20.0 N of Items = 10
Alpha = .9754
Universitas Sumatera Utara
128
Lampiran 4 Uji Univariat
kelompok umur responden
Frequency Percent
Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent 35
16 47,1
47,1 47,1
=35 18
52,9 52,9
100,0 Valid
Total 34
100,0 100,0
Pendidaikan terakhir surveilans KIA
13 38.2
38.2 38.2
21 61.8
61.8 100.0
34 100.0
100.0 menengah
tinggi Total
Valid Frequency
Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Lama bekerja petugas surveilans KIA
14 41.2
41.2 41.2
20 58.8
58.8 100.0
34 100.0
100.0 5
=5 Total
Valid Frequency
Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Pengetahuan petugas surveilasn KIA
15 44.1
44.1 44.1
19 55.9
55.9 100.0
34 100.0
100.0 tidak baik
baik Total
Valid Frequency
Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Ketrampilan petugas suerveilan KIA
16 47.1
47.1 47.1
18 52.9
52.9 100.0
34 100.0
100.0 tidak baik
baik Total
Valid Frequency
Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Universitas Sumatera Utara
129
Motivasi petugas surveilans KIA
15 44.1
44.1 44.1
19 55.9
55.9 100.0
34 100.0
100.0 tidak baik
baik Total
Valid Frequency
Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Dana untuk kegiatan surveilans KIA
21 61.8
61.8 61.8
13 38.2
38.2 100.0
34 100.0
100.0 tidak baik
baik Total
Valid Frequency
Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Sarana untuk kegiatan surbveilans KIA
17 50.0
50.0 50.0
17 50.0
50.0 100.0
34 100.0
100.0 tidak baik
baik Total
Valid Frequency
Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Prosedur kerja untuk kegatan surveilans KIA
18 52.9
52.9 52.9
16 47.1
47.1 100.0
34 100.0
100.0 tidak baik
baik Total
Valid Frequency
Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Kinerja petugas surveilans KIA
15 44.1
44.1 44.1
19 55.9
55.9 100.0
34 100.0
100.0 tidak baik
baik Total
Valid Frequency
Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Universitas Sumatera Utara
130
Lampiran 5 Analisis Bivariat
1. kelompok umur responden Kinerja petugas surveilans KIA
kelompok umur responden Kinerja petugas surveilans KIA Crosstabulation
Kinerja petugas surveilans KIA
tidak baik baik
Total Count
9 7
16 35
within kelompok umur
responden 56,3
43,8 100,0
Count 6
12 18
kelompok umur responden
=35 within
kelompok umur responden
33,3 66,7
100,0 Count
15 19
34 Total
within kelompok umur
responden 44,1
55,9 100,0
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. 2-sided
Exact Sig. 2-sided
Exact Sig. 1-sided
Pearson Chi-Square 1,804b
1 ,179
Continuity Correctiona
,995 1
,319 Likelihood Ratio
1,818 1
,178 Fishers Exact Test
,300 ,159
Linear-by-Linear Association
1,751 1
,186 N of Valid Cases
34 a Computed only for a 2x2 table
b 0 cells ,0 have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7,06.
Risk Estimate
95 Confidence Interval Value
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for kelompok umur responden 35
=35 2,571
,640 10,338
For cohort Kinerja petugas surveilans KIA = tidak baik
1,688 ,771
3,693 For cohort Kinerja petugas
surveilans KIA = baik ,656
,344 1,250
N of Valid Cases 34
Universitas Sumatera Utara
131
2. Pendidikan terakhir surveilans KIA Kinerja petugas surveilans KIA
