The designed learning model is considered as poor and needs to modify if the response rate of 50 percent out of the maximum point was considered as adequate.
Then, the range score was 2.50 – 2.99. The designed learning model was considered as very poor and need a replacement the response rate below 50
percent out of the maximum point. The range score was 0.00 – 2.49. The result of Expert Validation questionnaire is displayed in the following table.
Table 4.10 The Result of Experts Validation Questionnaire No
Statement Mean
Criteria 1.
The syllabus is well developed. 4.33
Very Good
2. The topic in the learning model is in line with the
syllabus. 4.67
Very Good
3. The learning model is interesting.
4.00 Very
Good
4.
The learning model has consistency. Layout, font color and size, and capitalization are consistent.
4.33 Very
Good
5. The learning model is easy to navigate clear
instructions. 4.33
Very Good
6. The text in the learning model is readable.
4.33 Very
Good
7.
The pictures in the learning model help the students in recognizing words.
4.00 Very
Good
8. The learning material provides continuous material to
develop reading skill 4.00
Very Good
9.
The learning model encourages interaction between Students and Teacher.
4.33 Very
Good
10. The learning model encourages interaction between
Students and Students. 4.00
Very Good
11. The learning model provides activities that similar to
students’ real life. 4.67
Very Good
12.
The learning model provides opportunities for
students to learn language system good exposure such as grammar, vocab, etc..
4.33 Very
Good
13. The annotation linked definition of certain words in
the learning model helps the students to recognize the meaning of the words.
4.00 Very
Good
14. The learning model integrates many language skills
reading, speaking, vocabulary 4.67
Very Good
15. The learning model improves students’ motivation to
learn English. 4.67
Very Good
16. The students are able to enjoy learning English with
the learning model. 4.67
Very Good
17. Students have enough time to get feedback using the
