Question Response
Mean Criteria
Table 3.7 is the template for describing the result of need analysis questionnaire. Four aspects are included in the template such as question,
response, mean and interpretation.
2. Evaluation
Beside need analysis questionnaire, there were two other questionnaires that were employed in this study. They were expert validation questionnaire and
User’s evaluation questionnaire. The questionnaires were adapted from Likert scale with five agreements included. They are:
Strongly Agree SA : 1
Agree A : 2
Not Sure NS : 3
Disagree D : 4
Strongly Disagree SD : 5 The following table is the template to describe the questionnaire for data
collection on expert validation and students’ opinion.
Table 3.8 The Description of Expert Validation Data Collection Template No
Questions And
Statements Answers
Number N
Mean Interpretation
Based on Best’s 1980, the range of the point of agreement is categorized into 1 – 5. In addition, the interpretation of the converted score was elaborated in
the following table.
Table 3.10 The Interpretation of the Degree of Agreement Best, 1980 Range
Meaning
3.50 – 5.00 No revision
3.00 – 3.49 Conduct more exploration on the existing part of the learning
model 2.50 – 2.99
Modify part of the designed learning model 0.00 – 2.49
Replace the rejected part of the designed learning model
The analyzed data can be interpreted as the following explanation. With the total maximum point 5, the designed learning model was considered as very good
and no revision needed if the response rate of 70 percent out of the total maximum point was considered as very high. Therefore, the range score was 3.50 – 5.00.
The designed learning model was considered as good and needs to be explored more if the response rate of 60 percent out of the total maximum point was
considered as high. Thus, the range point was 3.00 – 3.49. The designed learning model is considered as poor and needs to modify if the response rate of 50 percent
out of the maximum point was considered as adequate. Then, the range score was 2.50 – 2.99. The designed learning model was considered as very poor and need a
replacement the response rate below 50 percent out of the maximum point. The range score was 0.00 – 2.49.
3. Participants’ Opinion and Suggestion
