Education and Leadership in Glocalization : What does “think globally, act locally” mean for education around the world?
21-24
2014
205
understanding” and “learning to work with others”. The students learned about the teamwork concept via
an activity-based camp. The activity evaluation results obtained from the students showed that the
preparation camp play a significant role in their essential skills improvement.
Keywords:Essential skills, Preparation process, Work-integrated learning
1. Introduction
One of missions of King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi KMUTT is to develop and
promote educational and learning systems in which students are capable of life-long learning, the best
academicallyand have virtue, morality and work ethics. According to the mission, Work-integrated
Learning WiL is one of disciplines that develops students to be work-ready and well-rounded
graduates. As stated by Cooper et al. 2010, WiL is the intersection and engagement of theoretical and
practice learning. It is the process of bringing together formal learning and productive work, or theory and
practice. WiL program in KMUTTwas firstly introduced at the graduate level of Chemical
Engineering department in 1997 and subsequently founded in other disciplines, such as food
engineering, starch engineering and technology, bioinformatics, and biotechnology Ku et al., 2005.
In 2013, a special model of WiL, WiL-KMUTT, for the undergraduate level was firstly implemented. Key
factors in the WiL-KMUTT model are the problem- based learning at a practice site together with a
facilitation system for students learning. Since students are one of main parts in WiL, preparation
process is crucial before entering the workplace. Students have to know what and how they have to do
in the workplace and should be ready to learn under a “real-world” problem Martin Hughes, 2009.This
study focused on the preparation process of the WiL- KMUTT model and students’ perceptions on
effectiveness of the preparation activities.
2. Student preparation inWiL-KMUTT program
To prepare students in the WiL-KMUTT program to be ready for entering the practice site,
preparation for learning was a key step in the WiL program. There are 2 main sessions in the preparation
process, delivering of WiL concept and useful information to students and providing skills needed
for learning in the workplace. The process started with giving an overview picture of learning in WiL
program, learning benefits and experiences that students would get during the program. In
addition,students were explained about workplace literacy including basic information of the workplace,
practical standards and ethical issues.
The other session was focused on the preparing some essential skills prior to working in the practice
site. Seven work-based attributes i.e. data management, problem solving, working attitude,
working discipline, planning, communication, and teamwork were expected for students in the WiL
program. Two skills, communication and teamwork, were primarily trained for students in the preparation
process. One-day workshop and activity-based camp were set for coaching a communication skill, mainly
focused on a technical presentation, and team working skill, respectively.
2.1 Delivering of WiL concept and workplace literacy
The first part was an orientation session from university executives. Messages of the university
policy, expectation and motivation of learning in WiL program, activities, tasks, and responsibilities in the
practice site were delivered to students. Additionally, to provide information of workplace issues to student,
a HR personal of the practice site had been invited to give an overview of the company,including
organization background, working culture, policy, code of conducts, and practical standards. Ethical and
moral issues in the organization point of view were also discussed with students.
Understanding and perception of students N=21 on WiL concept and workplace literacy were
evaluated before and after the session. Five-point rating scales were used in a survey 5 = excellent, 4 =
good, 3 = average, 2 = below average, 1 = poor. 2.2 Presentation workshop
One-day workshop,consisting of a lecture-based and presentation practice, was carried out to give
aconcept of how to deliver a technical message to non-technical audiences effectively.Contents in the
lecture part are the composition of the presentation,media preparation, andtechniques in
presentation. Speaker spent 45 minutes in each topic. At the end of the lecture, students were grouped into 5
people and each of them had to prepare 5 minutes presentation on a topic of their interest using the
knowledge learned from the lectures.Others in the team assessed and commented upon the topics learned
in the lectures.
During the presentation practice, students were evaluated their presentation skill by lecturers and get
feedback to improve their skill. Four-point rating scales were used in this evaluation 4 = excellent, 3 =
good, 2 = average, 1 = poor. After the workshop, students N=14 evaluated effectiveness of the
activity about content, knowledge and benefits getting from the workshop.Five-point rating scales were used
in a survey 5 = excellent, 4 = good, 3 = average, 2 = below average, 1 = poor.
2.3How to work with others? - A team working camp
Camp activity has been held for 4 days and 3 nights at the university campus. The purpose of this
camp is to build familiarity among students and develop teamwork skill. Three activity-based modules
Education and Leadership in Glocalization : What does “think globally, act locally” mean for education around the world?
21-24
2014
206
conducting learning, 2
human rel different d
rotated the module, st
FILA the Outcomes,
activities b communica
module. In relations a
environmen carried out
After evaluated
improveme survey 5
below aver
3. Evalua
The re students pe
university students pr
content in assessment
teamwork c Stude
perception program, l
responsibil working st
and ethics The asses
Students i perception
significantl after the o
understand expectation
and moral average f
respectively better unde
learn and p and 4.69 fo
rule and respectively
g in the camp 2 self- and o
ation and com departments w
eir group in tudents learned
abbreviation and Action
based on Sat ation NVC w
n the last mod and communic
nt, mini-dialo .
the teamwo effectiveness
ent. Five-point = excellent, 4
rage, 1 = poor
ation results
esults consists erception and u
expectation a resentation ski
the presentatio t on their sk
camp. ents assessed
of the univ learning expec
lities during w tandard workp
and morality in sment result
indicated that of all issues
ly paired T-te orientation sess
ding and perc n, workplace ru
litybefore the for all issue
y. However, a erstanding on
practice during for WiL policy
regulation, y.
consist of 1 other- understa
mmunication. were grouped
each activity d to solve a
for Facts, Id ns table.Self-r
tir model and were performed
duleof learning cation, activitie
ogue, and obs
ork camp, stu of the camp
t rating scales 4 = good, 3 =
. of 3 main part
understanding and workplac
ills and their a on workshop, a
kills after tr dtheir unders
versity policy ctation tasks,
working at the place rules an
n the company was shown
t their unde mentioned ab
est at 95 con sion. Students
ception of Wi ule and regulat
orientation w s 2.70, 2.6
after the orient what and how
the WiL progr y and expectati
and ethics problem-based
anding, and 3 Students from
together and y. In the firs
problem using deas, Learning
reflection and d non-violence
d in the second g about human
es under a se servation were
udents N=21 on their skills
were used in a = average, 2 =
ts, which are 1 of WiL policy
ce literacy, 2 assessments on
and 3 students aining in the
standing and y about WiL
activities, and e practice site
nd regulations y point of view
in Figure 1 erstanding and
bove increased nfidence level
assessed thei iL policy and
tion, and ethics was almost on
5, and 3.07 tation, they ge
w they have to ram4.52, 4.53
ion, workplace and morality
d m
d st
g g
d e
d n
et e
s a
=
y, n
s e
d L
d e,
, w.
. d
d r
d s
n 7,
et o
3, e
y, Figure 1
policy of and aft
Pres during th
assigned topic. Th
aspects, w aids, phy
to answe Table 1
a present aids, sp
questions However
composur gesture,
constraint
Table 1.P entering t
Organizat Visual aid
Physical c Speech m
Ability to Adhere to
Stud content
knowledg presentati
the works 4.40 aft
bypaired also indi
helpful an future s
applicatio
Figure 2 Afte
effectiven evaluated
1.Understandin f WiL program
fter getting info compa
sentation skill he presentatio
to give a 5-m eir presentatio
which are cont ysical composu
er questions, a . The result in
tation with go peech mechan
s scores 3 , students sh
re, such as ma and manage
t score 3 me Presentation ski
the WiL progra Topics
tion ds
composure mechanics
o answer quest o time constrai
dents gave the Figure 2.
ge and under ion significant
shop score = 2 terthe worksho
T-test at 95 icated that co
nd can be appl score = 4.87
ons, respectivel
2.Evaluation re technical pres
er the teamw ness of activitie
d their four ng of students a
m and workplac ormationfrom u
any executives lsof students
on workshop. minute talk on
n skills were e tent organizatio
ure, speech m and adhere to
ndicated that st ood content or
nics,and abili means “good
hould improve aintain eyes c
their talk acc eans “average t
ills of students am
me 3.
3. 2.
tions nts
3. 3.
2.
eir opinion on They indica
rstanding abou tly improved
2.67 beforethe op,significanc
confidence ontents in the
lied in their wo and 4.67 fo
ly.
sults of the “H sentation” wor
work camp, st es on skills dev
essential ski about university
e literacy befo university and
were assess Students we
n their interest evaluated from
on, use of visu echanics, abili
time constrain tudents prepar
rganizing, visu ity to answ
d to excellent” e their physic
ontact or prop cording to tim
to good”. s prior to
Score ean SD
14 0.48 12 0.46
95 0.53 04
05 82
0.49 0.26
0.70
n the worksh ated that the
ut the technic after training
e workshop an ce test analyz
e level.Studen e workshop a
orking life in t or benefits an
How to prepare rkshop
tudents assess velopment. Th
ills, which a y
re
ed ere
ted m 6
ual ity
nts red
ual wer
”. cal
per me
op eir
cal in
nd zed
nts are
the nd
a ed
hey are
Education and Leadership in Glocalization : What does “think globally, act locally” mean for education around the world?
21-24
2014
207
teamwork, communica
The result affected on
paired T- teamwork,
communica in a range
and 4.24 t Mean diffe
and after th teamwork,
communica that the cam
students kn
Figure 3. self- and
skill of stu
4. Conclu