Complementizer -pa with PCU matrix verbs
18.11.9 Complementizer -pa with PCU matrix verbs
Givón talks about PCU verbs 2001:309. They are perception, cognition, and utterance verbs, e.g. ‘to see, to understand, to hear, to say’. The following examples illustrate how the complement clauses combine with the PCU matrix verbs in Lhomi. 18.223 ni tam ʈhii-ni ni kurik sitijo-so nispektor-so kurik pempu language enquire-NFNT2 DM all CDO-PL1 inspector-PL1 all official t ɕhi-jaa tɕhi-jaa-ki doŋ-tu hassøt kurik-la tam ɕøt=tu high-COMP2 high-COMP2-GEN in.front-LOC VIP all-DAT speech speak=PURP ts ʏt-ni u-ki dzimpa di-la tam ɕøt=tu tsʏt-ni ni cause-NFNT2 that-GEN Dzimpa DEF-DAT speech speak=PURP cause-NFNT2 DM ni ni pempu t ɕhi-jaa di-p-e [ u-ki dzimpa di-la DM official high-COMP2 DEF-HUM1-ERG that-GEN Dzimpa DEF-DAT nantak-ki nak mip- pa ] thoŋ-a bet. TE31 major-GEN crime NEG.EXIST-NMLZ;Q see-NMLZ;Q AUX ‘After the high officials and the police inspector had interrogated Jimpa in the presence of them all, they saw Jimpa having no major crime.’ The matrix verb is T1 type. The complement clause in square brackets is the direct object argument of the matrix verb ‘to see’. 18.224 u-ni ajekpa gir-kil-la phin-ni j aŋ sane that-ABL ajekpa wander-NMLZ-DAT go.come[PST]-NFNT2 CONTR2 place t ɕik-tu mi tɕik mø møp-pa-taŋ ʈhep-pa bet. INDF-LOC man INDF ploughing plough-NMLZ;Q-COM meet-NMLZ;Q AUX ni u-la gantikma te-ni [u-ki kaŋpa-la dzutta mat-khøm-pa] that-DAT closely look.at-NFNT2 that-ERG foot-DAT shoes NEG-wear-NMLZ;Q thoŋ-a bet. TE67 see-NMLZ;Q AUX ‘While Ayekpa was wandering around, he actually met a man who was ploughing. After he had looked at the man very closely, Ayekpa saw him not wearing shoes.’ In this example the underlined clause is nominalized and embedded into the matrix clause as its absolutive marked object argument. 18.225 [khit- raŋ-ki ŋit ʈhek-kin thep-pa tɕhi-kuk. 2PL-FOC-ERG 1PL meet-NMLZ like.to-NMLZ;Q do;VBZR-PROG;VIS sir-a ] ha khoo-t ɕuŋ. say-NMLZ;Q aud.impact hear-PST.EXP We heard someone saying that you would like to see us.’ This is indirect speech and sir-a is the complementizer. 2PL pronoun indicates that it is the observation of the reporter, not a direct quotation of the recipients of the letter. Someone who has witnessed that the recipients of this letter would like to meet with the writer has reported to the writer what he has witnessed. 18.226 hunto aku- raŋ mennak-ki liŋ-la jøk-ken bek=o. now uncle-self darkness-GEN totality-DAT EXIST-NMLZ;CONJ AUX=NEW.INF [ ɕi-ja him-pa na sø-pa him-pa] die-NMLZ;Q COP-NMLZ;Q or survive-NMLZ;Q COP-NMLZ;Q ha mit-khoo-ken bek=o. aud.impact NEG-undestand-NMLZ;CONJ AUX=NEW.INF aku- raŋ hariŋ-ni tɕhi-pa di lʏ thaŋ sim uncle-self today-ABL do;VBZR-NMLZ;Q DEF body and mind jaa ʈhe tshar-a bek=o. TE51 apart be.separated[PST] fall.off-NMLZ;Q AUX=NEW.INF ‘I inform you uncle now that you are in the darkness. You do not understand whether you are the one who has died or the one who has survived. Uncle, I inform you, from today onwards your body and mind have become totally separated.’ This example comes from a speech of a lama who performs post mortem rituals. He addresses the dead person. Two coordinate underlined clauses have been nominalized and the matrix verb is ‘to understand, to realize’. The object nominalization has produced a NP which is embedded as an object of the matrix verb. The complement clause is in square brackets.18.11.10 Complementizer -pa with the matrix verb nø
Parts
» Human classifier -pa, HUM1 Human classifier -paa, HUM2
» Marking plural in noun stems, PL1
» Marking plural in noun stems, NPs, and demonstratives
» Quantifiers marking plural of count nouns
» Numerals marking plural of count nouns
» Quantifiers modifying mass nouns
» baalik rii rii hat Cardinal numerals
» Marking the group of participants on numerals
» Ordinal numerals Partitive numerals
» Demonstratives as free pronouns
» Distal remote spatial demonstratives
» Indefinite spatial demonstratives Ablative marked demonstratives marking temporal linkage
» The ablative case The instrumental case
» The locative case The inessive case
» The allative case sillcdd 34.
» The vocative case sillcdd 34.
» Postpositions with genitive complements
» Postpositions with absolutive complements Postpositions with comitative complements
» Traces of grammatical gender in adjectives
» Derivational operators that produce adjectives from nouns, postpositions, and adverbs
» Derivational operators that produce adjectives from verbs
» Manner adverbs modifying the following verb
» Expressive manner adverbs Manner clauses modifying the finite verb
» Nominalized manner clauses as complements of a noun or NP More generic manner adverbs
» Specific time Adverbs of time
» Relative time Adverbs of time
» Adverbs that modify a NP or a whole clause Reversed conditional and emphatic adverbs
» Epistemic adverbs Adverbs of intensity
» Imparting new information Clitics
» Speaker’s embarassment and frustration
» Disclaimer or ‘hearsay’ particle Mirative particle
» Determination particle Speaker’s corrective particle
» Speaker’s rectifying particle Hearer’s agreement particles
» Confirmation Speaker’s compassionate attitude
» Speaker’s acceptance or call for acceptance
» Speaker’s call for attention
» Speaker’s emphatic call for attention
» Speaker’s response or call for response
» Morphophonemic vowel changes in verb roots
» Semantically empty grammatical heads
» Phonological and morphological note about negative prefixes
» Negated existential copulas Negated equative copular verbs
» Backward spreading of negation Double negation
» Conjunctdisjunct agreement patterns In bi-transitive verbs
» An alternative way to analyze conjunct marker -ken
» Speakerhearer’s direct experience with the action or the event of a finite verb, which is
» Speaker’s inference based on visual results of an event
» Speakerhearer’s direct sensory observation of the event of a finite verb marked by -
» Speakerhearer’s direct sensory observation of the process of a finite verb marked by -kuk
» Speakerhearers direct sensory observation marked in existential copulas
» Speaker’s inference from circumstantial evidence
» Speakerhearer’s assumed evidential based on general knowledge
» Speaker’s source of information is direct speech, quotative
» Speaker’s source of information is “hearsay”
» roo uko- Intransitive clause
» Possessive copular clause Descriptive copular clause Locational copular clause
» Evidentials Judgements Epistemic modality
» Abilitive ‘be able to’ Modal verb ‘attempt to’
» Abilitive ‘know how’ Modal attitude verbs
» Modal verb ‘want todesire to’
» Aspectual verbs marking inception
» Aspectual verb marking initiation Aspectual verb marking completion
» Clauses which have lexically empty verb heads and no nominal argument Verb nominalizers
» Prenominal relative clause with external head
» Headless relative clause Relative clauses
» Internally headed relative clause Non-restrictive relative clause
» Subject relative clause in finite position Object relative clause in finite position
» Correlative clauses Relative clauses
» Simple question Alternative questions affirmative–affirmative
» Alternative questions affirmative–negated Content questions
» Tag questions Interrogative clausesentence
» Punctiliar imperative Honorific imperative
» Speaker centered imperative Imperatives
» Honorific precative Hortative Emphatic hortative
» Non-proximate non-immediative imperative sillcdd 34.
» Pronouncing a curse or a blessing
» Subordinate purpose clause Adverbial clauses
» Subordinate conditional clause Adverbial clauses
» Subordinate concessive clause Adverbial clauses
» Subordinate substitutive clause Subordinate simultaneous clause
» Subordinate reason clause marked by t
» Subordinate reason clause marked by NMLZ -pa and DAT case
» Subordinate temporal end point Subordinate temporal onset point
» Subordinate additive clause Adverbial clauses
» Non-final temporal sequence Serial verb constructions
» Non-final means–result relation Non-final manner relation
» Completive aspect in serial chaining
» Benefactive construction Serial verb constructions
» Serial chaining and imperative finite verb Negation with shared subject
» Complementizer =tu Complement clauses
» Complementizer -ri Complement clauses
» Complementizer -lu Complementizer - Complement clauses
» Complementizer -le Complementizer -ro
» Complementizer -t Complement clauses
» Complementizer -ken Complement clauses
» Complementizer -pa with PCU matrix verbs
» Complementizer -pa with the matrix verb nø Double embedding complementations
» ‘Therefore’ relator ‘If that is the case’ sentence relator
» ‘Nevertheless, however, despite’ relators ‘Both and’ paratactic relator
» Exception sentence relator ma di
» Exception sentence relator Sentence relators
» ‘Tail-head’ sentence relator Groundsreason sentence relator
» Contrastive relation in paired clauses
» Exception contrast Co-ranking structures
» Elaboration, paraphrase, amplification, exemplification, and frustration
» DM marking a non-finite clause
» DM marking a NP and other syntactic units
» hassøt marking a prominent participant in a narrative
Show more