How were ‘early actions’ implemented? How were they funded? Com-

Pelajaran dari Pengalaman Proyek Pesisir 1997 - 1999 3. How were members of provincial working groups selected? The composition of groups is different at each site, but all groups include government representatives and all are chaired by BAPPEDA representa- tives. In Sulawesi Utara and Kalimantan Timur, the Field Project Manager andor technical advisor, and BAPPEDA representatives decided membership by designating the agencies they wanted included in the groups. At Lampung, the Field Project Management worked with stakeholder representatives to decide who should be included. 4. What activities have been undertaken by the PWG? Provincial Working Groups have been involved in a number of activities. In Sulawesi Utara, the PWG was involved in site selection, participated in study tours, work- shop training, regular profiling, as well as review of year 1 activities and budgeting. They also assisted with reports to the governor and bupati. In the Kalimantan Timur site, the group has participated in training. At Lampung, the group has just begun to meet. 5. How effective have the PWG been? In Sulawesi Utara the group met monthly and was active in specific project activities such as site selection. Recently the group has started to meet quarterly and participation has been more passive. While the group has been helpful in coordination in the first year 19971998, finding an effective way for them to be more actively involved has been difficult. In year 2, a Kabupaten Task Force KTF was formed. The emphasis of the KTF will be in reviewing draft village management plans. The PWG, now a Provincial Advisory Group PAG, will be involved in more of an advisory capacity, such as discus- sions of policies for scaling up, a role more consistent with the availability of members. In Kalimantan Timur, PSC and PTF activities are just begin- ning and they have been involved in some technical activities and training. In Lampung, individuals who will be members of the PSC have assisted in program activities. Some Possible Lessons 6. Advisory groups should be formed in time to participate in major project decisions such as field or demonstration site selection. It is not clear that PWG are essential. However, if they are required they should be formed. 7. An Surat Keputusan-SK decree from the governor is needed to give legitimacy or authority to a provincial group. However, it should not constrain responsibilities and tasks of government agencies. 8. If private sector and NGO participation is wanted in the group, then an S.K. from the governor may not always be appropriate. An informal group with broader participation may be preferable, but roles and decision-making may have to be different. Selection of non-governmental representatives needs to be given careful thought since any one organization cannot necessarily represent the others. MONITORING 1. What is monitoring? Monitoring is the systematic documentation of project efforts at both the project and program scale and at all relevant spatial scales. 2. What are the objectives of monitoring? The objectives of monitoring are to: a identify changes in community social, economic and environ- mental conditions which may relate to project activities; b insure that project activities are implemented as designed; c document governance activities including preparation of plans and ordinances as well as enforce- ment and compliance; d provide accountability information to program managers and funders; and e provide information for learning, project re- design and potential project replication. xvi