Western Indonesia National Roads Improvement Project 25
Package No. 3 : Manggopoh – Padang Sawah
The current overall work progress of only 29.11
against scheduled progress of 51.62
since the works commenced 13 month ago is of much concern due to the very limited remaining contract
time left. As of end of this month, the remaining contract time is only 47 or 346 calendar days with still
71 of the works to be completed. At the end of this reporting month January 2015 the slippage went farther down to
-22.51 fro pre ious o th’s slippage of -19.63 in December 2014.
If the average accomplishment of close to only 5 per month progress attained for the past three 3 months will not improve to at least twice the previous monthly work output in coming months,
the Project will never be completed on the target date of completion on the early part of January 2016 unless the Contractor will work double time to implement a realistic and workable action
plan. The problem of slow and delayed work progress have be going-on for the past six 6 months.
Problem which the Contractor have to prioritize and give more attention to resolve are the frequent out of order of the Asphalt Mixing Plant, inadequate number of units of dump truck,
shortage of labor for drainage works and low output of the crusher plant to produce quantity of aggregate requirements.
Due to urgency to maximize the output of paving works to attain a good monthly progress, the Contractor shall maintain the AMP regularly and address and resolve all issues that are presently
hampering the progress of the works.
A more detailed status of the project progress are shown in ANNEX P- E ecutive “u
ar Report .
Package No. 4 : Ipuh – Bantal
The current status of this contract package still remain in critical situation with respect to completion date on January 9, 2016 as the negative slippage further went down to
-33.14 from
-31.53 the last month.
To date the actual progress of only 13.79
since the project started 13 month ago is of much concern than the slippage. Simply looking at the percentage of work accomplished, it seems that
the project is only on the early stage of construction, whereas by this time, at least 47
of the works should have been completed.
The major work item which should have been given more concentration in order to attain a good progress during the period would have been the drainage works
12.26 , granular pavement
18.07 and asphalt pavement
49.27 which have a combine total work value of
79.40 .
However, the Contractor was able to accomplished only 3.96
, progress for the three 3 major orks ite out of the o erall o th’s progress of
4.44 .
Inspite of the high level meeting between the DGH and Contractors that was held in December 2014 in Padang wherein the main agenda were to resolved all issues and major problems that
hampered the progress of the works, the expectation from the Contractor to deliver positive outcome never happened. It is evident that the Contractor never attempted to put the works
Western Indonesia National Roads Improvement Project 26
toward attaining good progress as only 4.44
of the works was accomplished during the whole month of January 2015.
The problem of slow and delayed progress have started during the 5
th
month May 2014 till this day. With only
47 or 346 calendar days of the contract time are left for the remaining
86 of the
works to be done, the target date of completion may never be realized unless the Contractor will work double time on a realistic workable action plan in the coming months ahead.
Some of the major problems that should be given more attention to resolve by the Contractor are insufficient number of units of various equipment and shortage of labor.
Shown in ANNEX P- E ecutive “u
ar Report are the current problem and actions to be
taken to attain substantial progress in order to catch-up with the schedule. For contract packages under AWP-2 and AWP-3 which have a combined total of 17 Packages, a
brief summary of the actual activities and status as of this reporting period are presented in Table 1.1, page 8 of this Report.
Western Indonesia National Roads Improvement Project 27
4.5 Quality Assurance
The DSC will be responsible for quality assurance of materials and workmanship, certifying whether or not contractors have achieved the required results, as well as documentation and
reporting based on the financial management plan. They will prepare a Quality Assurance system covering all subprojects, and continuously monitor the effectiveness of their supervision
procedures.
4.6 Environmental and Social Considerations
4.6.1 Current Overall Situation
A project category is assigned to each package as either Category A, B or C depending on the likely degree of influence on environmental issues with a brief explanation as follows:
Category A project is one which will have a significant negative impact on the environment and may have an influence on areas outside the actual project area. A project classified as such
requires an AMDAL ANDAL, RKLRPL study. Category B project is one which affects the people or the environment to some extent but with a
smaller impact than a Category A. The required environmental analysis is a UKLUPL study only. Category C project has minimal effect on the people or environment and an environmental
analysis is not required. SPPL are used to handle any minor problem which may arise. All the twenty one 21 packages require environmental impact investigations. There are a total of
fourty one 41 studies required, twenty 20 for environmental impact investigations and twenty one 21 for social studies.
The twenty 20 environmental studies need the approval of the Environmental Agency BLH with five 5 of the studies AMDALEIA to be approved by World Bank WB.
While the twenty one 21 social studies SLARAP and LARAP require the approval of World Bank prior to implementation.
As of end of this reporting period January 2014, twenty 20 environmental impact studies has
been approved by BLH, while all of the five 5 studies that requires World Bank approval, Bank already issued No Objection Letter NOL.
With the exception of Packages 9 and 18, which are proposed to be deleted, all the other nineteen 19 social studies were already issued with No Objection Letter NOL from the World
Bank. Details of sub-projects that require environmental and social safeguards and progress are shown
in Appendix E.
Western Indonesia National Roads Improvement Project 28
Presented below in a tabulated format is the current status of the environmental and social studies.
Works Program
No of Packages
No of Investigations Approval by
Remarks BLH
World Bank
AWP-1 4
11 AMDAL x 1
UKLUPL x 2 SPPL x 4
Full LARAP x 4 1 AMDAL 1
UKLUPL 4 SPPL
1 EIA, NOL Issued by WB
4 Full LARAP
Approved – NOL issued
by WB LARAP and AMDAL paket 117,
except for SPPL. UKL-UPL for Package
No.4 processing of environmental permit
was recommended by BLH Kab. Muko-muko
and environmental permit on 4 Dec 2014
AWP-2 9
16 AMDAL Study x 4
UKLUPL x 4 Simple LARAP x 1
Full LARAP x 7 4 UKLUPL
4 AMDAL 1 Simple
LARAP; 7 Full LARAP
4 EIA, NOL Issued by WB
1 one Study AMDAL for three packages.
Packages No.7, 12 and 14 packages on AWP2
AWP3.
1 one Study AMDAL for two packages.
Packages No.11 16. packages on AWP2
AWP3.
AWP-3 8
12 Full LARAP x 6
Simple LARAP x 1 AMDAL Study x 1=
Paket No.1 AWP 1 UKLUPL x 5
AMDAL OK = paket No.1
17 AWP1 5 UKLUPL
EIA same with Package 1
1 Simple LARAP;
6 Full LARAP Approved
– NOL issued by WB include AMDAL
except for UKLUPL
Total 21
39 Env=20,Soc=19
20 5 EIA, 19
LARAP
Note: UKL UPL do not need a NOL from WB, and SPPL not necessary to submit to the WB.
Appendix E shows the Progress of Environmental Safeguard Studies. 4.6.2
Environmental and Social Issues
This section outlines the activities of the Social Impact Specialist and the Environmental Specialist during January 2014.
4.6.2.1 Environmental Issues
During the month of January 2014, the RKPPL prepared by Contractors of Packages 2 and 3 were issued with No Objection Letter by the World Bank, while RKPPL for Packages 1 and 4 were
submitted to PMU for submitted to World Bank and request for No Objection Letter.
1. Monitoring of Environmental Aspects During Construction
CTC provided monitoring forms to DSC for use in monitoring of environmental and social impacts. These forms are to be used and submitted every month. In the absence DSC Environmental
Western Indonesia National Roads Improvement Project 29
Specialist from the Supervision Team, the Tea ’s Super isio E gi eers ha e monitor and submit
the Report for environmental mitigation measures of each contract package. CTC’s e iro
e tal staffs acti ely ad ises DSC o e ironmental monitoring, but DSC have not directly carried out monitoring or to implement the Environmental and Social Analysis
Management Plan for WINRIP. To date, o ly the DSC’s Site E gi eer of Package 1 have regularly submitting the monthly
environmental mitigation reports since January to December 2014 although the Reports were not in standard format that was provided by CTC.
For the three 3 other packages, the Site Supervision Engineers of Contract Packages No.2, 3 and 4 have started the updating of their respective Reports which are expected to be submitted to CTC
by next month.. CTC issued three letters to DSC requiring DSC to submit the Reports at each end of the month.
Environmental Monitoring Report for the month of January 2014 have not yet been submitted by the Site Supervision Engineers of DSC to CTC.
2. Design Integration, Road Safety Aspects and Monitoring of Environmental Studies
Task 5.8.0 of CTC-2 TOR Implement the Environmental and Social Analysis Management PlanESAMP and paragraf 10.9 of the PMM requires ensuring that environmental management
aspects of contracts have been implemented in accordance with AMDAL, UKLUPL, SPPL studies and environmental issues will be integrated in the design and to prepare environmental mitigation
on construction stage for contractor Contractor Program for Executing Environmental Management Plan CPEMPRKPPL. Therefore CTC will proposed that staff visit the site of projects
subject to studies or issues, and ensure that the plans are being implemented. A schedule for these visits are scheduled as the need arises.
During the period January , the CTC’s E iro
e tal Specialist co ducted monitoring of implementation of AMDAL, UKLUPL and SPPL on 12 Packages. The remaining 7 Packages are
scheduled to be monitored this coming February and March 2015. Draft Report on the review of Integration of AMDAL, UKLUPL and SPPL has been submitted to PMU. The recommendations of
AMDAL and UKLUPL are not yet incorporated in Detailed Engineering Design DED. CTC will coordinate with DSC and BALAI II regarding this matter.
4.6.2.2 Social Issues 1. Monitoring Report of the LARAP
Package No. 1 : Krui
– Biha Province
: Lampung
A. Previous Status : LARAP documents approved by World Bank on January 4, 2013
Monitoring Report approved by World Bank on April 18, 2013
