18.71 WINRIP DOC MPR CTC MPR No.25 2015 01 2015 01 12 00224.

Western Indonesia National Roads Improvement Project 25 Package No. 3 : Manggopoh – Padang Sawah The current overall work progress of only 29.11 against scheduled progress of 51.62 since the works commenced 13 month ago is of much concern due to the very limited remaining contract time left. As of end of this month, the remaining contract time is only 47 or 346 calendar days with still 71 of the works to be completed. At the end of this reporting month January 2015 the slippage went farther down to -22.51 fro pre ious o th’s slippage of -19.63 in December 2014. If the average accomplishment of close to only 5 per month progress attained for the past three 3 months will not improve to at least twice the previous monthly work output in coming months, the Project will never be completed on the target date of completion on the early part of January 2016 unless the Contractor will work double time to implement a realistic and workable action plan. The problem of slow and delayed work progress have be going-on for the past six 6 months. Problem which the Contractor have to prioritize and give more attention to resolve are the frequent out of order of the Asphalt Mixing Plant, inadequate number of units of dump truck, shortage of labor for drainage works and low output of the crusher plant to produce quantity of aggregate requirements. Due to urgency to maximize the output of paving works to attain a good monthly progress, the Contractor shall maintain the AMP regularly and address and resolve all issues that are presently hampering the progress of the works. A more detailed status of the project progress are shown in ANNEX P- E ecutive “u ar Report . Package No. 4 : Ipuh – Bantal The current status of this contract package still remain in critical situation with respect to completion date on January 9, 2016 as the negative slippage further went down to -33.14 from -31.53 the last month. To date the actual progress of only 13.79 since the project started 13 month ago is of much concern than the slippage. Simply looking at the percentage of work accomplished, it seems that the project is only on the early stage of construction, whereas by this time, at least 47 of the works should have been completed. The major work item which should have been given more concentration in order to attain a good progress during the period would have been the drainage works 12.26 , granular pavement 18.07 and asphalt pavement 49.27 which have a combine total work value of 79.40 . However, the Contractor was able to accomplished only 3.96 , progress for the three 3 major orks ite out of the o erall o th’s progress of 4.44 . Inspite of the high level meeting between the DGH and Contractors that was held in December 2014 in Padang wherein the main agenda were to resolved all issues and major problems that hampered the progress of the works, the expectation from the Contractor to deliver positive outcome never happened. It is evident that the Contractor never attempted to put the works