Conceptual Framework LITERATURE REVIEW AND CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK

37

CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHOD

This chapter contains eight subchapters. It covers the research design, the research setting, the subjects of the research, the research instruments, the data collection techniques, the data analysis technique, the research procedures, and validity and reliability of the study.

A. Research Design

This research, using audio-visual aids in the implementation of communicative activities to improve the speaking skills of grade eight students of SMP N 2 Sanden in the academic year of 20142015 is an action research study, which focuses on the efforts to improve the real condition of the English teaching and learning process. According to Burns 2010:2, action research is part of a broad movement that has been going on in education generally for some time. It is related to the ideas of ‘reflective practice’ and ‘the teacher’ as ‘researcher’. To explore your own teaching contexts, action research involves taking a self- reflective, critical, and systematic approach. This research study was implemented in the form of collaborative action research. In conducting the collaborative action research, the researcher invited the English teacher and the students to work collaboratively. The research was done collaboratively both in the reconnaissance steps and in the implementation. In this case, the researcher cooperated with the English teacher of class VIII. The team worked together in planning, implementing and reflecting the action. The action research was conducted in some cycles, depend on the aim of the research study. The process was conducted as the cycles below: Figure 3.1: Cyclical action research model by Kemmis and McTaggart in Burns 2010.

B. Research Setting

1. Place of the Research

This research was conducted at SMP N 2 Sanden on the first semester of the 20142015 academic year. This school is located in Jl. Samas, Srigading, Sanden, Bantul, Yogyakarta. It has 21 classrooms, For the facilities, it has two basketball fields, two language laboratories, two science laboratories, one large hall, two computer rooms, one mosque, two canteens, one library, one teachers’ room, one staff room, and one headmaster’s room. The condition of this school is quite clean, big, wide, and bright. It is not crowded because it is far away from the street, at about 50 meters away. There are fifty teachers, eight staffs, and a headmaster. There are 4 English teachers, all graduated from English education department. They have taught the students for many years. Their experiences also support their English teaching skills. There are six hundred and thirty five students, and two hundred and thirteen of them are in grade VIII. Most of them are from low-middle economy class. Most of their parents are farmer, seller, and a few of them are civil servants. Generally, students in this school have low motivation in learning English. The classroom for each class is big, sufficient for about 26-28 students. There are sufficient chairs and table in every classroom.

2. Time of the Research

The research was conducted in the first semester of the academic year 20142015 and started from August to October based on the academic calendar and class schedule.

C. Participants of the Research

This researcher involved the headmaster, the English teacher, and the students of class VIII C in SMP N 2 Sanden. The researcher implemented the action while the English teacher and the observer observed and noted the students’ reaction and condition on the class.

D. Research Instruments

In order to gain qualified data, the researcher collected the data by using some instruments. The instruments for collecting the data were in the forms of: 1. Field notes According to McKay 2006:81, descriptive field notes are essential for quality ethnographic studies because they provide a recording of what the researcher has seen and heard. Field notes were taken during the teaching learning process when conducting the action research. 2. Observation Checklist The observation checklist was provided to enable the observer to record behaviors during sessions of the research quickly, accurately and with minimal interviewer effect on behavior. 3. Questionnaire According to Burns 2010:81, it is best to use a questionnaire also sometimes called a survey, checklist, or schedule when you want to get responses from several people and you do not have time to interview. Questionnaire was used to gain information about students’ opinion about the audio-visual aids and what the students’ want and need. 4. Interview guidelines Interview guidelines listed the questions or issued to be explored during the interview. It helped the researcher to conduct the interviews systematically. 5. Speaking Scoring Rubric Speaking scoring rubric was used to assess and collect the data of the students’ speaking ability. The rubric of the students’ speaking performance was used to get the information about the students’ speaking ability after using audio- visual aids had been conducted. It was used two times to assess the first and second cycle. To collect all the data, the researcher utilized a camera and a recorder to record the students’ performances in the teaching and learning process. Table 3.1 Scoring Rubric adopted from New York State LOTE Assessment ASPECTS SCORE 1 2 3 4 5 PRONUNCIATION No attempt Most utterances contain errors. Many utterances are incomprehen sible. Little communicati on. Many errors that interfere with compreh ensibility . Frequent errors that confuse listeners and require guessing at meaning. Comprehensible , generally correct. Occasional error. Phonetically correct. Almost error- free. Awareness of accent. Genuine effort to sound like native speaker. SYNTAX GRAMMAR No attempt or repeats cue. Most structures incorrect. Constant use of infinitive; no conjugation. Listener understands only because past experience. Many errors agreeme nt, verb forms. Errors impede communi cation. Frequent errors. Selfcorrect s on some. Two or fewer syntax errors. Minor errors that do not impede communication. No grammatical errors. Speaker self- corrects without hesitation. FLUENCY No attempt. May repeat cue. Constant searching for vocabulary, verb tense. Dies not complete utterances. Frequent hesitatio ns, searches for words. Overly translates questions before response. Repeat question word before response. Eventuall y responds. Halting, hesitating. Visibly translating before responding . Can rephrase and respond. Occasional hesitation, searching for words. Speaker can self-correct and respond to cues. Smooth flow. Quick, continuous flow. Natural pauses. VOCABULARY No attempt. Totally Does not complete responses. Inadequa te vocabula Vocabular y is just adequate to Good, appropriate vocabulary. Very good; wide range. Uses